Griffanti Ludovica, Salimi-Khorshidi Gholamreza, Beckmann Christian F, Auerbach Edward J, Douaud Gwenaëlle, Sexton Claire E, Zsoldos Enikő, Ebmeier Klaus P, Filippini Nicola, Mackay Clare E, Moeller Steen, Xu Junqian, Yacoub Essa, Baselli Giuseppe, Ugurbil Kamil, Miller Karla L, Smith Stephen M
FMRIB (Oxford University Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain), UK; Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy; MR Laboratory, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
FMRIB (Oxford University Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain), UK.
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 15;95:232-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.034. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
The identification of resting state networks (RSNs) and the quantification of their functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI (rfMRI) are seriously hindered by the presence of artefacts, many of which overlap spatially or spectrally with RSNs. Moreover, recent developments in fMRI acquisition yield data with higher spatial and temporal resolutions, but may increase artefacts both spatially and/or temporally. Hence the correct identification and removal of non-neural fluctuations is crucial, especially in accelerated acquisitions. In this paper we investigate the effectiveness of three data-driven cleaning procedures, compare standard against higher (spatial and temporal) resolution accelerated fMRI acquisitions, and investigate the combined effect of different acquisitions and different cleanup approaches. We applied single-subject independent component analysis (ICA), followed by automatic component classification with FMRIB's ICA-based X-noiseifier (FIX) to identify artefactual components. We then compared two first-level (within-subject) cleaning approaches for removing those artefacts and motion-related fluctuations from the data. The effectiveness of the cleaning procedures was assessed using time series (amplitude and spectra), network matrix and spatial map analyses. For time series and network analyses we also tested the effect of a second-level cleaning (informed by group-level analysis). Comparing these approaches, the preferable balance between noise removal and signal loss was achieved by regressing out of the data the full space of motion-related fluctuations and only the unique variance of the artefactual ICA components. Using similar analyses, we also investigated the effects of different cleaning approaches on data from different acquisition sequences. With the optimal cleaning procedures, functional connectivity results from accelerated data were statistically comparable or significantly better than the standard (unaccelerated) acquisition, and, crucially, with higher spatial and temporal resolution. Moreover, we were able to perform higher dimensionality ICA decompositions with the accelerated data, which is very valuable for detailed network analyses.
静息态功能磁共振成像(rfMRI)中静息态网络(RSN)的识别及其功能连接的量化受到伪影的严重阻碍,其中许多伪影在空间或频谱上与RSN重叠。此外,功能磁共振成像采集技术的最新发展产生了具有更高空间和时间分辨率的数据,但可能会在空间和/或时间上增加伪影。因此,正确识别和去除非神经波动至关重要,尤其是在加速采集过程中。在本文中,我们研究了三种数据驱动的清理程序的有效性,比较了标准分辨率与更高(空间和时间)分辨率的加速功能磁共振成像采集,并研究了不同采集和不同清理方法的综合效果。我们应用单受试者独立成分分析(ICA),然后使用基于FMRIB的ICA的X噪声去除器(FIX)进行自动成分分类,以识别伪影成分。然后,我们比较了两种一级(受试者内)清理方法,以从数据中去除这些伪影和与运动相关的波动。使用时间序列(幅度和频谱)、网络矩阵和空间图分析来评估清理程序的有效性。对于时间序列和网络分析,我们还测试了二级清理(由组级分析提供信息)的效果。比较这些方法,通过从数据中回归出与运动相关波动的全空间以及仅伪影ICA成分的唯一方差,在噪声去除和信号损失之间实现了较好的平衡。使用类似的分析,我们还研究了不同清理方法对来自不同采集序列的数据的影响。采用最佳清理程序,加速数据的功能连接结果在统计上与标准(未加速)采集相当或显著更好,并且至关重要的是,具有更高的空间和时间分辨率。此外,我们能够对加速数据进行更高维度的ICA分解,这对于详细的网络分析非常有价值。