Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Diabetes Centre, Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, UK The University of Manchester, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK.
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Diabetes Centre, Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, UK The University of Salford, School of Health Sciences, Salford, UK.
Acupunct Med. 2014 Jun;32(3):242-9. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2013-010495. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
To examine the role of acupuncture in the treatment of diabetic painful neuropathy (DPN) using a single-blind, placebo-controlled RCT and to collect data that would be required in a future definitive study of the efficacy of acupuncture in DPN.
45 patients were allocated to receive a 10-week course either of real (53%) or sham (47%) acupuncture. Five standardised acupuncture points on the lower limb of each leg were used in the study: LR3, KI3, SP6, SP10 and ST36. Outcome measures included the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) scale, lower limb pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS); Sleep Problem Scale (SPS); Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP); 36-item Short Form 36 Health Survey and resting blood pressure (BP).
Over the 10-week treatment period, small improvements were seen in VAS -15 (-26 to -3.5), MYMOP -0.89 (-1.4 to -0.3), SPS -2.5 (-4.2 to -0.82) and resting diastolic BP -5.2 (-10.4 to -0.14) in the true acupuncture group. In contrast, there was little change in those receiving sham acupuncture. A moderate treatment effect in favour of active acupuncture was detected in MYMOP scores -0.66 (-0.96 to -0.35) but non-significant effect sizes in LANSS Pain Scale -0.37 (-2.2 to 1.4), resting diastolic BP -0.50 (-3.0 to 1.99) and the SPS -0.51 (-2.2 to 1.16).
We have demonstrated the practicality and feasibility of acupuncture as an additional treatment for people with DPN. The treatment was well tolerated with no appreciable side effects. Larger randomised trials are needed to confirm the clinical and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of DPN.
ISRCTN number: 39740785.
采用单盲、安慰剂对照 RCT 研究评估针灸在治疗糖尿病性痛性神经病变(DPN)中的作用,并收集将来评估针灸治疗 DPN 疗效的确定性研究所需的数据。
将 45 例患者分配接受为期 10 周的真(53%)或假(47%)针灸治疗。每条腿的下肢使用 5 个标准化的针灸穴位:LR3、KI3、SP6、SP10 和 ST36。研究结果包括利兹评估神经症状和体征(LANSS)量表、下肢疼痛(视觉模拟量表,VAS);睡眠问题量表(SPS);自我评估医疗结局测量量表(MYMOP);36 项简短健康调查(36-item Short Form 36 Health Survey)和静息血压(BP)。
在 10 周的治疗期间,真针灸组的 VAS-15(-26 至-3.5)、MYMOP-0.89(-1.4 至-0.3)、SPS-2.5(-4.2 至-0.82)和静息舒张压-5.2(-10.4 至-0.14)均有较小改善。相比之下,接受假针灸的患者几乎没有变化。在 MYMOP 评分方面,真针灸组有中度的治疗效果(0.66,-0.96 至-0.35),而在 LANSS 疼痛量表方面无显著效果(0.37,-2.2 至 1.4)、静息舒张压(0.50,-3.0 至 1.99)和 SPS(0.51,-2.2 至 1.16)。
我们已经证明了针灸作为 DPN 患者的附加治疗方法的实用性和可行性。该治疗方法耐受性良好,无明显副作用。需要更大规模的随机试验来证实针灸治疗 DPN 的临床和成本效益。
ISRCTN number:39740785。