1 Department of Podiatric Medicine, School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
2 NICM Health Research Institute, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Acupunct Med. 2019 Feb;37(1):3-15. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2018-011666. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
To examine evidence for acupuncture interventions in the management of diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy (DPN) symptoms.
Five electronic databases were searched up to June 2017 for studies that included participants with symptoms of DPN, used an acupuncture intervention, and reported before-and-after DPN-related outcome measures. Two reviewers independently performed the data extraction. The level of homogeneity was assessed, and studies were appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, the STRICTA guidelines for acupuncture reporting and the NICMAN scale for acupuncture quality.
Ten studies with 432 participants were included: three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two pilot RCTs, three uncontrolled clinical trials, one quasi-RCT and one prospective case series. Improvements in DPN pain symptoms were reported by all studies. Heterogeneity of outcome measures prevented a meta-analysis. Variations were found in needle retention time and point selection, as well as total number and frequency of treatments. Common acupuncture point selections were ST36 and SP6. Half of the studies used local point selection. Studies conducted outside China had better acupuncture reporting and quality according to the STRICTA checklist and NICMAN scales, respectively. Risk of bias was high or unclear in the majority of studies for all domains except attrition bias.
Acupuncture for DPN appears to improve symptoms. However, the application of acupuncture varies greatly, and the quality of included studies was generally low. Available studies have varying methodologies and different outcome measures. Further, suitably powered studies using appropriate DPN outcome measures are required.
考察针刺干预糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)症状管理的证据。
检索截至 2017 年 6 月的五个电子数据库,以寻找包括 DPN 症状患者、采用针刺干预并报告 DPN 相关结局测量前后的研究。两名评审员独立进行数据提取。评估同质性,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具、针刺报告的 STRICTA 指南和针刺质量的 NICMAN 量表对研究进行评估。
纳入 10 项研究,共 432 名参与者:3 项随机对照试验(RCT)、2 项先导 RCT、3 项非对照临床试验、1 项准 RCT 和 1 项前瞻性病例系列。所有研究均报告了 DPN 疼痛症状的改善。由于结局测量的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。针刺保留时间和穴位选择、治疗总次数和频率存在差异。常见的针刺穴位选择是 ST36 和 SP6。半数研究采用局部穴位选择。根据 STRICTA 清单和 NICMAN 量表,中国以外的研究在针刺报告和质量方面分别更好。除了失访偏倚外,大多数研究在所有领域的偏倚风险均较高或不明确。
针刺治疗 DPN 似乎可以改善症状。然而,针刺的应用差异很大,纳入研究的质量普遍较低。现有的研究具有不同的方法学和不同的结局测量。此外,需要使用适当的 DPN 结局测量进行适当的、有力的研究。