Suppr超能文献

硬膜穿刺后头痛血液补片治疗后神经轴性疼痛干预的时机

Timing of neuraxial pain interventions following blood patch for post dural puncture headache.

作者信息

Shaparin Naum, Gritsenko Karina, Shapiro David, Kosharskyy Boleslav, Kaye Alan D, Smith Howard S

机构信息

Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; The Mount Sinai Medical Center/Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans; Albany Medical College.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2014 Mar-Apr;17(2):119-25.

Abstract

Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of interventional neuraxial procedures. Larger needle gauge, younger patients, low body mass index, women (especially pregnant women), and "traumatic" needle types are all associated with a higher incidence of PDPH. Currently, an epidural blood patch is the gold-standard treatment for this complication. However, despite the high PDPH cure rate through the use of this therapy, little is known about the physiology behind the success of the epidural blood patch, specifically, the time course of patch formation within the epidural space or how long it takes for the blood patch volume to be resorbed by the body. Of the many unanswered and debated topics related to PDPH and epidural blood patches, one additional specific question that may alter clinical management is when it is safe for patients who have experienced a disruption of the thecal space and have undergone this procedure to have a subsequent epidural or spinal procedure, such as a neuraxial anesthetic (i.e. a spinal anesthetic for an elective outpatient procedure) or an interventional pain procedure for chronic pain management. This question becomes more unclear if the new procedure includes a steroid medication. As an example, an older patient presents with a history of lumbar disc disease and during lumbar epidural steroid injection, an inadvertent wet tap occurs leading to PDPH. Following management with fluids, caffeine, medications, and a successful epidural blood patch, it remains unclear as to when would be the best time frame to consider a second lumbar epidural steroid injection. We identified the 3 main risk factors of subsequent interventional neuraxial procedures as (1) disruption of the epidural blood patch and ongoing reparative processes, (2) epidural procedure failure, and (3) infection. We looked at the literature, and summarized the existing literature in order to enable health care professionals to understand the time course of dural repair as well as the risks of subsequent neuraxial procedures after epidural blood patches. This review poses the question using an evidence based review to discuss the appropriate time course to proceed.

摘要

硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是介入性椎管内操作的常见并发症。较大的针号、年轻患者、低体重指数、女性(尤其是孕妇)以及“创伤性”针型均与PDPH的较高发生率相关。目前,硬膜外血贴是治疗该并发症的金标准。然而,尽管通过使用这种疗法PDPH的治愈率很高,但对于硬膜外血贴成功背后的生理学机制,特别是硬膜外间隙内血贴形成的时间进程或血贴体积被身体吸收所需的时间,人们知之甚少。在与PDPH和硬膜外血贴相关的众多未解答和有争议的话题中,另一个可能改变临床管理的具体问题是,经历过硬膜囊破裂并接受过该操作的患者,何时进行后续的硬膜外或脊柱操作(如椎管内麻醉,即择期门诊手术的脊髓麻醉)或慢性疼痛管理的介入性疼痛操作是安全的。如果新操作包括使用类固醇药物,这个问题就变得更加不明确。例如,一名老年患者有腰椎间盘疾病史,在腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射期间,意外发生硬膜穿破导致PDPH。在通过补液、咖啡因、药物治疗以及成功进行硬膜外血贴后,尚不清楚何时是考虑第二次腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射的最佳时间框架。我们确定了后续介入性椎管内操作的3个主要风险因素为:(1)硬膜外血贴破裂及持续的修复过程,(2)硬膜外操作失败,(3)感染。我们查阅了文献,并总结了现有文献,以使医护人员了解硬膜修复的时间进程以及硬膜外血贴后后续椎管内操作的风险。本综述通过循证综述提出问题,以讨论合适的进行时间进程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验