Ziemann Malte, Hennig Holger
Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Transfus Med Hemother. 2014 Feb;41(1):40-4. doi: 10.1159/000357102. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
Traditionally, leukoreduction and selection of blood products from seronegative donors have been used as alternative strategies to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus infections (TT-CMV) in atrisk patients. After the introduction of universal leukoreduction for red blood cell and platelet concentrates in Germany, a controversy evolved as to whether the additional selection of blood products from seronegative donors would reduce or even increase the risk of TT-CMV. This review summarizes the current knowledge about CMV infections in blood donors and the implications of this information on the effect of potential transfusion strategies. Even though there are conflicting data about the incidence of TT-CMV remaining after the introduction of leukodepletion, it has been clearly shown that both prevalence and concentration of CMV DNA in peripheral blood are highest in newly seropositive donors. Therefore, avoidance of blood products from these donors is the most important goal of any transfusion strategy. This goal can be reached by: i) selection of blood products from seronegative donors, ii) provision of CMV DNA-negative blood products, or iii) provision of blood from long-term seropositive donors. In cases of suspected TT-CMV, all implicated donors should be investigated carefully to gather further knowledge on which donors confer the lowest risk for TT-CMV.
传统上,白细胞滤除以及选用来自血清学阴性献血者的血液制品一直被用作降低高危患者输血传播巨细胞病毒感染(TT-CMV)风险的替代策略。在德国对红细胞和血小板浓缩物实施普遍白细胞滤除后,对于从血清学阴性献血者中额外选用血液制品是否会降低甚至增加TT-CMV风险产生了争议。本综述总结了目前关于献血者巨细胞病毒感染的知识以及这些信息对潜在输血策略效果的影响。尽管关于白细胞去除后TT-CMV发生率的数据存在冲突,但已明确表明,外周血中巨细胞病毒DNA的流行率和浓度在新血清学阳性献血者中最高。因此,避免使用这些献血者的血液制品是任何输血策略的最重要目标。这一目标可通过以下方式实现:i)选用来自血清学阴性献血者的血液制品;ii)提供巨细胞病毒DNA阴性的血液制品;或iii)提供来自长期血清学阳性献血者的血液。在怀疑发生TT-CMV的情况下,应对所有相关献血者进行仔细调查,以进一步了解哪些献血者导致TT-CMV的风险最低。