Meyer Benjamin, Drosten Christian, Müller Marcel A
Institute of Virology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany.
Institute of Virology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany.
Virus Res. 2014 Dec 19;194:175-83. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Mar 23.
More than a decade after the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2002/2003 the occurrence of a novel CoV termed Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) CoV challenges researchers and public health authorities. To control spread and finally contain novel viruses, rapid identification and subsequent isolation of infected individuals and their contacts is of utmost importance. Next to methods for nucleic acid detection, validated serological assays are particularly important as the timeframe for antibody detection is less restricted. During the SARS-CoV epidemic a wide variety of serological diagnostic assays were established using multiple methods as well as different viral antigens. Even though the majority of the developed assays showed high sensitivity and specificity, numerous studies reported on cross-reactive antibodies to antigens from wide-spread common cold associated CoVs. In order to improve preparedness and responsiveness during future outbreaks of novel CoVs, information and problems regarding serological diagnosis that occurred during the SARS-CoV should be acknowledged. In this review we summarize the performance of different serological assays as well as the applicability of the two main applied antigens (spike and nucleocapsid protein) used during the SARS-CoV outbreak. We highlight challenges and potential pitfalls that occur when dealing with a novel emerging coronavirus like MERS-CoV. In addition we describe problems that might occur when animal sera are tested in serological assays for the identification of putative reservoirs. Finally, we give a recommendation for a serological testing scheme and outline necessary improvements that should be implemented for a better preparedness.
2002/2003年严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)出现十多年后,一种名为中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)的新型冠状病毒的出现给研究人员和公共卫生当局带来了挑战。为了控制新型病毒的传播并最终遏制其传播,快速识别并随后隔离受感染个体及其接触者至关重要。除了核酸检测方法外,经过验证的血清学检测尤为重要,因为抗体检测的时间范围限制较少。在SARS-CoV疫情期间,使用多种方法以及不同病毒抗原建立了多种血清学诊断检测方法。尽管大多数已开发的检测方法显示出高灵敏度和特异性,但大量研究报告了针对广泛传播的普通感冒相关冠状病毒抗原的交叉反应抗体。为了提高未来新型冠状病毒爆发期间的应对准备和响应能力,应认识到SARS-CoV疫情期间血清学诊断出现的信息和问题。在本综述中,我们总结了不同血清学检测方法的性能以及SARS-CoV疫情期间使用的两种主要应用抗原(刺突蛋白和核衣壳蛋白)的适用性。我们强调在应对像MERS-CoV这样的新型冠状病毒时出现的挑战和潜在陷阱。此外,我们描述了在血清学检测中检测动物血清以识别假定宿主时可能出现的问题。最后,我们给出了血清学检测方案的建议,并概述了为更好地做好准备应实施的必要改进措施。