Suppr超能文献

血清白蛋白和前白蛋白可预测创伤性脑损伤的不良预后。

Serum albumin and prealbumin predict the poor outcome of traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Chen Du, Bao Long, Lu Shi-qi, Xu Feng

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e93167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093167. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serum albumin and prealbumin are both negative acute-phase reactants, and usually at low levels in stress. We aim to determine their predictive values for poor outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

A total of 326 patients of TBI were enrolled and followed-up by telephone 6 months after discharge. They were divided into a favorable group (GOS: 3 to 5) and an unfavorable group (GOS: 1 to 2). Serum albumin and prealbumin were measured from vein blood within 24 h after admission.

RESULTS

Ninety one (27.9%) patients were with poor outcome (GOS: 1 to 2). The unfavorable group had lower albumin and prealbumin (P<0.001). Albumin and prealbumin were both positively correlated with GCS (r = 0.489, P<0.001; r = 0.222, P<0.001, respectively) and GOS (r = 0.518, P<0.001; r = 0.314, P<0.001, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, the odds ratios of albumin and prealbumin were 0.866, 95% CI: 0.829 to 0.904 and 0.990, 95% CI: 0.985 to 0.995, respectively. In subgroup of GCS≤8 (n = 101), the crude and adjusted odds ratios of serum albumin were both statistically significant (P = 0.027, P = 0.033, respectively), while prealbumin were not (P = 0.553, P = 0.576, respectively). The AUC of albumin for predicting poor outcome was 0.762, 95% CI: 0.712 to 0.807, which was significantly higher than that of prealbumin (0.664, 95% CI: 0.610 to 0.715). In analyses of all patients and subgroup of GCS≤8, the AUCs of serum albumin were both significantly higher than those of prealbumin (P = 0.001, P = 0.045, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both serum albumin and prealbumin could predict the poor outcome of TBI, but the former is much better, especially, in patients with severe TBI.

摘要

背景

血清白蛋白和前白蛋白均为负急性期反应物,在应激状态下通常处于低水平。我们旨在确定它们对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)不良预后的预测价值。

方法

共纳入326例TBI患者,出院后6个月通过电话进行随访。将他们分为预后良好组(GOS:3至5)和预后不良组(GOS:1至2)。入院后24小时内从静脉血中检测血清白蛋白和前白蛋白。

结果

91例(27.9%)患者预后不良(GOS:1至2)。预后不良组的白蛋白和前白蛋白水平较低(P<0.001)。白蛋白和前白蛋白均与GCS呈正相关(r分别为0.489,P<0.001;r为0.222,P<0.001),与GOS也呈正相关(r分别为0.518,P<0.001;r为0.314,P<0.001)。在调整混杂因素后,白蛋白和前白蛋白的比值比分别为0.866,95%可信区间:0.829至0.904和0.990,95%可信区间:0.985至0.995。在GCS≤8的亚组(n = 101)中,血清白蛋白的粗比值比和调整后比值比均具有统计学意义(分别为P = 0.027,P = 0.033),而前白蛋白则无统计学意义(分别为P = 0.553,P = 0.576)。白蛋白预测不良预后的AUC为0.762,95%可信区间:0.712至0.807,显著高于前白蛋白(0.664,95%可信区间:0.610至0.715)。在所有患者及GCS≤8亚组的分析中,血清白蛋白的AUC均显著高于前白蛋白(分别为P = 0.001,P = 0.045)。

结论

血清白蛋白和前白蛋白均可预测TBI的不良预后,但前者更好,尤其是在重度TBI患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b714/3966890/b407345f8826/pone.0093167.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验