Can Scientists Regulate the Publication of Dual Use Research?
作者信息
Resnik David B
机构信息
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health Box 12233, Mail Drop CU 03, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, U.S.A.
出版信息
Stud Ethics Law Technol. 2010 Feb;4(1). doi: 10.2202/1941-6008.1124.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Can Scientists Regulate the Publication of Dual Use Research?科学家能规范两用研究的发表吗？
Stud Ethics Law Technol. 2010 Feb;4(1). doi: 10.2202/1941-6008.1124.
2
Data sharing and dual-use issues.数据共享和两用问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9298-7. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
3
Pain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal Welfare.疼痛与实验动物：为实现更好的数据可重复性和更好的动物福利的出版规范
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155001. eCollection 2016.
4
How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers.科学家如何看待当前的出版文化？一项针对荷兰生物医学研究人员的定性焦点小组访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 17;6(2):e008681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008681.
5
Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.医学科学家的发表压力与科研不端行为
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):64-71. doi: 10.1177/1556264614552421. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
6
Publication rates of pharmaceutical scientists: application of the waring distribution.制药科学家的发表率：威林分布的应用。
Drug Metab Rev. 1987;18(4):553-71. doi: 10.3109/03602538708994132.
7
Dual publication: "ingelfinger rule" debated by scientists and press.双重发表：科学家和媒体对“英格尔芬格规则”展开辩论。
Science. 1972 Jun 30;176(4042):1403-5. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4042.1403.
8
Awareness and Attitudes of Research Students Toward Dual-use Research of Concern in Pakistan: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire.巴基斯坦研究型学生对两用研究的认识和态度：一项横断面问卷调查。
Health Secur. 2019 May/Jun;17(3):229-239. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0002.
9
The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.发表过程本身是基因流行病学中发表偏倚的主要原因。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
10
Relationship Between Time of First Publication and Subsequent Publication Success Among Non-PhD Physician-Scientists.非博士学位医生-科学家首次发表时间与后续发表成功之间的关系。
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Jun;4(2):196-201. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00068.1.
引用本文的文献
1
Scaling-up production of plant endophytes in bioreactors: concepts, challenges and perspectives.扩大植物内生菌在生物反应器中的生产：概念、挑战与展望。
Bioresour Bioprocess. 2021;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00417-y. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
Should all medical research be published? The moral responsibility of medical journal editors.所有医学研究都应该发表吗？医学期刊编辑的道德责任。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Oct;44(10):690-694. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104785. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
Biological Risks and Laboratory-Acquired Infections: A Reality That Cannot be Ignored in Health Biotechnology.生物风险和实验室获得性感染：健康生物技术中不容忽视的现实。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Apr 28;3:56. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00056. eCollection 2015.
4
Dual use research: investigation across multiple science disciplines.两用研究：跨多学科科学的调查。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):327-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9535-y. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
5
The concept of governance in dual-use research.两用研究中的治理概念。
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Aug;17(3):447-57. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9542-9.
6
Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern.生物安全以及对两用关注研究的审查与发表
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Sep;10(3):290-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0011. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
7
One study, two paths: the challenge of dual-use research.一项研究，两条道路：两用研究的挑战。
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Jun;120(6):A238-42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.120-a238.
8
Dual dual-use research of concern: publish and perish?双重两用关注研究：发表与消亡？
Indian J Med Res. 2011 Jan;133(1):1-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Governance of dual-use research: an ethical dilemma.两用研究的治理：一个伦理困境。
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):720-3. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.051383.
2
Biosecurity policies at international life science journals.国际生命科学期刊的生物安全政策。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Mar;7(1):61-71. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2008.0027.
3
Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences.生物科学中两用困境的伦理与哲学思考。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):523-80. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9043-4. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
4
A tale of two studies; ethics, bioterrorism, and the censorship of science.两项研究的故事；伦理、生物恐怖主义与科学审查
Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 May-Jun;37(3):35-43. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2007.0046.
5
The dual-use dilemma for the life sciences: perspectives, conundrums, and global solutions.生命科学的两用困境：观点、难题与全球解决方案。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2006;4(3):276-86. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.276.
6
When risk outweighs benefit. Dual-use research needs a scientifically sound risk-benefit analysis and legally binding biosecurity measures.当风险大于收益时。两用研究需要科学合理的风险收益分析和具有法律约束力的生物安全措施。
EMBO Rep. 2006 Jul;7 Spec No(Spec No):S10-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400726.
7
Better never than late.宁早勿迟。
Science. 2005 Oct 14;310(5746):195. doi: 10.1126/science.310.5746.195.
8
Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus.重建的1918年西班牙流感大流行病毒的特性分析。
Science. 2005 Oct 7;310(5745):77-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1119392.
9
Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes.1918年流感病毒聚合酶基因的特性研究
Nature. 2005 Oct 6;437(7060):889-93. doi: 10.1038/nature04230.
10
Analyzing a bioterror attack on the food supply: the case of botulinum toxin in milk.分析针对食品供应的生物恐怖袭击：以牛奶中的肉毒杆菌毒素为例。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 12;102(28):9984-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408526102. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
Zotero 插件