Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany,
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;29(3):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9891-6. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
The frailty index (FI), defined by a deficit accumulation approach, has emerged as a promising concept in gerontological research, but applications have been mostly restricted to populations from Canada and the United States aged 65 years or older. Baseline data from the German ESTHER cohort study (N 9,886; age 50-75; mean follow-up 8.7 years) were used to create a FI through a deficit accumulation approach. For estimation of frailty prevalence, we used cut-points for the FI to define three categories (non-frail 0 to ≤0.20; pre-frail >0.20 to <0.45; frail ≥0.45). We assessed variation of the FI by age and sex: 10-year survival according to baseline FI was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and bivariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Cubic splines were used to assess sex-specific dose-response associations. Prevalence of frailty was 9.2 and 10.5% in women and men, respectively. Age-specific prevalence of frailty ranged from 4.6% in 50-54 year old participants to 17.0% in 70-75 year old participants. Below 60 years of age, men had a higher FI than women. However, the FI showed a stronger increase with age among women (3.1% per year) than among men (1.7% per year) and was higher among women than men in older age groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for all-cause mortality were 1.08 (0.84-1.39), 1.32 (1.05-1.66), 1.77 (1.41-2.22), and 2.60 (2.11-3.20) for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th quintile of the FI compared to 1st quintile, respectively. There was a strong dose-response relationship between the FI and total mortality among both men and women and both younger (<65 years) and older subjects. We found sex differences in the FI and its increase with age, along with a consistent strong association of the FI with mortality in both sexes, even for age group 50-64.
衰弱指数(FI)是通过缺陷积累法定义的,它已成为老年学研究中一个很有前途的概念,但应用主要局限于加拿大和美国的 65 岁及以上人群。本研究使用德国 ESTHER 队列研究(N=9886;年龄 50-75 岁;平均随访 8.7 年)的基线数据,通过缺陷积累法构建 FI。我们使用 FI 的切点将衰弱指数分为三个类别(非衰弱:0 至≤0.20;衰弱前期:0.20 至<0.45;衰弱:≥0.45)来估计衰弱的患病率。我们通过年龄和性别评估 FI 的变化:通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和双变量及多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估基线 FI 对应的 10 年生存率。立方样条用于评估性别特异性剂量反应关系。女性和男性的衰弱患病率分别为 9.2%和 10.5%。特定年龄的衰弱患病率从 50-54 岁参与者的 4.6%到 70-75 岁参与者的 17.0%不等。60 岁以下人群中,男性的 FI 高于女性。然而,女性的 FI 随年龄增长的增幅(每年 3.1%)高于男性(每年 1.7%),且在年龄较大的人群中,女性的 FI 高于男性。全因死亡率的调整后危险比(95%置信区间)分别为第 2、3、4、5 五分位数与第 1 五分位相比为 1.08(0.84-1.39)、1.32(1.05-1.66)、1.77(1.41-2.22)和 2.60(2.11-3.20)。FI 与男性和女性、年龄较小(<65 岁)和年龄较大的受试者的总死亡率之间存在很强的剂量-反应关系。我们发现,在男性和女性、年龄较小和较大的受试者中,FI 及其随年龄的增长存在性别差异,且 FI 与死亡率之间存在很强的关联,即使在 50-64 岁年龄组中也是如此。