• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在协作对话中捕捉参考重用中的自我中心偏差。

Capturing egocentric biases in reference reuse during collaborative dialogue.

作者信息

Knutsen Dominique, Le Bigot Ludovic

机构信息

CNRS and University of Poitiers (CeRCA, UMR 7295), Poitiers, France,

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1590-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0620-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0620-7
PMID:24671777
Abstract

Words that are produced aloud--and especially self-produced ones--are remembered better than words that are not, a phenomenon labeled the production effect in the field of memory research. Two experiments were conducted to determine whether this effect can be generalized to dialogue, and how it might affect dialogue management. Triads (Exp. 1) or dyads (Exp. 2) of participants interacted to perform a collaborative task. Analyzing reference reuse during the interaction revealed that the participants were more likely to reuse the references that they had presented themselves, on the one hand, and those that had been accepted through verbatim repetition, on the other. Analyzing reference recall suggested that the greater accessibility of self-presented references was only transient. Moreover, among partner-presented references, those discussed while the participant had actively taken part in the conversation were more likely to be recalled than those discussed while the participant had been inactive. These results contribute to a better understanding of how individual memory processes might contribute to collaborative dialogue.

摘要

大声说出的单词——尤其是自己说出的单词——比未说出的单词记忆效果更好,这一现象在记忆研究领域被称为生成效应。进行了两项实验,以确定这种效应是否可以推广到对话中,以及它可能如何影响对话管理。参与者以三人组(实验1)或二人组(实验2)的形式进行互动,以执行一项协作任务。分析互动过程中的指代复用发现,一方面,参与者更有可能复用他们自己提出的指代,另一方面,也更有可能复用通过逐字重复而被接受的指代。分析指代回忆表明,自我呈现的指代更容易获取只是暂时的。此外,在伙伴呈现的指代中,参与者积极参与对话时讨论的指代比参与者不活跃时讨论的指代更有可能被回忆起来。这些结果有助于更好地理解个体记忆过程如何促进协作对话。

相似文献

1
Capturing egocentric biases in reference reuse during collaborative dialogue.在协作对话中捕捉参考重用中的自我中心偏差。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1590-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0620-7.
2
Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research.协作编码与新的分类任务:对协作记忆研究的贡献。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1339-1351. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01929-w. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
The influences of partner accuracy and partner memory ability on social false memories.同伴准确性和同伴记忆能力对社会错误记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1225-38. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0443-9.
4
Production on hold: delaying vocal production enhances the production effect in free recall.暂停发声:延迟发声可增强自由回忆中的记忆效果。
Memory. 2018 May;26(5):589-602. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1384496. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.分类词汇表记忆中协同抑制的多种原因。
Memory. 2013;21(7):875-90. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.769058. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
Generating References in Naturalistic Face-to-Face and Phone-Mediated Dialog Settings.在自然主义的面对面和电话介导对话环境中生成参考文献。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Oct;8(4):796-818. doi: 10.1111/tops.12218. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
Effects of collaboration on the qualities of autobiographical recall in strangers, friends, and siblings: both remembering partner and communication processes matter.合作对陌生人、朋友和兄弟姐妹自传体回忆质量的影响:记住伙伴和沟通过程都很重要。
Memory. 2020 Mar;28(3):399-416. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1727521. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Conceptual match as a determinant of reference reuse in dialogue.概念匹配作为对话中参考复用的一个决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Mar;43(3):350-368. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000313. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Linguistic features of spontaneous speech predict conversational recall.口语的语言特征可预测会话回忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1638-1649. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02440-w. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Producing gestures facilitates route learning.做出手势有助于路线学习。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e112543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112543. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Remembering conversation in group settings.记住小组场合中的对话。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Sep 5. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01630-8.
2
#foodie: Implications of interacting with social media for memory.# 食货族:社交媒体互动对记忆的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Apr 16;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00216-7.
3
Memory for conversation and the development of common ground.对话记忆与共同基础的发展。

本文引用的文献

1
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
2
What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.共同学习,共同成长:说话者选择指称语反映了共同的经历。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):843-53. doi: 10.1037/a0029467. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
Production benefits learning: the production effect endures and improves memory for text.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1281-1294. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0730-3.
4
Memory and Common Ground Processes in Language Use.语言使用中的记忆与共同基础过程
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Oct;8(4):722-736. doi: 10.1111/tops.12224. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems.文化选择驱动人类交流系统的演化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 7;281(1788):20140488. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0488.
生成有益学习:生成效应持续存在,并提高文本记忆。
Memory. 2012;20(7):717-27. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.699070. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
4
Widening the boundaries of the production effect.拓宽生产效应的边界。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Oct;40(7):1046-55. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0210-8.
5
I said, you said: the production effect gets personal.我说,你说:制作效果因人而异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1197-202. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0168-8.
6
The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.生产效应:现象的描绘。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 May;36(3):671-85. doi: 10.1037/a0018785.
7
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.对话中的概念协定与词汇选择
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Nov;22(6):1482-93. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1482.
8
When do speakers take into account common ground?说话者何时会考虑共同背景?
Cognition. 1996 Apr;59(1):91-117. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(96)81418-1.
9
Referring as a collaborative process.将其视为一个协作过程。
Cognition. 1986 Feb;22(1):1-39. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7.