McAvinchey Grainne, Maxim Fay, Nix Barry, Djordjevic Jelena, Linklater Rognvald, Landini Gabriel
a Postgraduate Student, School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):957-65. doi: 10.2319/120213-888.1. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
To investigate the perception of facial asymmetry in young adults to identify the amounts of chin asymmetry that can be regarded as normal and may benefit from correction.
Three-dimensional (3D) images of 56 individuals of mixed ethnicity were obtained and used to produce average 3D images of male and female faces. Distortion was then applied to these average faces using a 3D graphics package to simulate different amounts of chin point asymmetry. Five observer groups (lay individuals, dental students, dental care professionals, dental practitioners, and orthodontists) assessed timed presentations of 3D images, rating them as "normal," "acceptable," or "would benefit from correction." Time-to-event analysis was used to assess the level of chin asymmetry perceived as normal and beneficial for correction for each group.
The factors influencing the perception of facial asymmetry were the degree of asymmetry and the observer group. Direction of the asymmetry and gender of the assessed individual did not affect the perception of asymmetry, except in the 4- to 6-mm distortion range. The gender of the observer had no influence on perception. There were statistically significant differences in the amounts of asymmetry that the laypeople and orthodontists considered to be normal (5.6 ± 2.7 mm and 3.6 ± 1.5 mm, respectively; P < .001) and felt would benefit from surgical correction (11.8 ± 4.0 mm and 9.7 ± 3.0 mm, respectively; P = .001).
Perception of asymmetry is affected by the amount of asymmetry and the observer group, with orthodontists being more critical.
研究年轻人对面部不对称的认知,以确定可被视为正常且可能受益于矫正的下巴不对称程度。
获取了56名混血个体的三维(3D)图像,并用于生成男性和女性面部的平均3D图像。然后使用3D图形软件包对这些平均面部施加变形,以模拟不同程度的下巴尖不对称。五个观察组(外行人、牙科学生、牙科护理专业人员、牙科医生和正畸医生)对3D图像的定时展示进行评估,将其评为“正常”、“可接受”或“将受益于矫正”。采用事件发生时间分析来评估每组认为正常且有利于矫正的下巴不对称程度。
影响面部不对称认知的因素是不对称程度和观察组。不对称方向和被评估个体的性别对不对称认知没有影响,但在4至6毫米的变形范围内除外。观察者的性别对认知没有影响。外行人与正畸医生认为正常的不对称程度(分别为5.6±2.7毫米和3.6±1.5毫米;P<.001)以及认为将受益于手术矫正的不对称程度(分别为11.8±4.0毫米和9.7±3.0毫米;P = .001)存在统计学显著差异。
不对称认知受不对称程度和观察组的影响,正畸医生更为严格。