Puolakkainen P A
Second Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Acta Chir Scand. 1989;155(1):25-30.
Because the severity of acute pancreatitis is difficult to assess in the early stage, analyses were made of the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of computed tomography (CT), C-reactive protein (CRP), serum phospholipase A2 and other laboratory parameters. In a series of 88 patients with clinically suspected severe acute pancreatitis, statistically significant differences were found between mild and severe disease in regard to CRP (97.1 vs. 265.7 mg/l), contrast enhancement of the pancreas at CT (45.3 vs. 22.7 Hounsfield units) and phospholipase A2 activity (5.3 vs. 11.2 nmol FFA/ml min). No significant intergroup difference was found in number of prognostic signs (1.7 vs. 4.1) or in extrapancreatic scores at CT (4.4 vs. 6.4). The sensitivity/specificity of different methods in severe pancreatitis were as follows: Prognostic signs 77.5/75%, CRP (greater than 140 mg/l) 100/81%, phospholipase A2 (greater than 11 nmol FFA/ml min) 42/100%, extrapancreatic score at CT (greater than 4) 100/29%, and contrast enhancement of the pancreas (less than 30 HU) 66/100%. Amylase determination was nonspecific (2-4%). The outcome in acute pancreatitis was most accurately predictable with CT or CRP.
由于急性胰腺炎的严重程度在早期难以评估,因此对计算机断层扫描(CT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血清磷脂酶A2及其他实验室参数的诊断特异性和敏感性进行了分析。在一系列88例临床疑似重症急性胰腺炎的患者中,发现轻症和重症患者在CRP水平(97.1对265.7mg/l)、CT检查时胰腺的强化程度(45.3对22.7亨氏单位)和磷脂酶A2活性(5.3对11.2nmol FFA/ml·min)方面存在统计学显著差异。在预后体征数量(1.7对4.1)或CT检查的胰腺外评分(4.4对6.4)方面未发现组间显著差异。不同方法对重症胰腺炎的敏感性/特异性如下:预后体征77.5/75%,CRP(大于140mg/l)100/81%,磷脂酶A2(大于11nmol FFA/ml·min)42/100%,CT检查的胰腺外评分(大于4)100/29%,胰腺强化程度(小于30HU)66/100%。淀粉酶测定缺乏特异性(2 - 4%)。急性胰腺炎的预后通过CT或CRP预测最为准确。