• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢噻肟与青霉素-氯霉素治疗化脓性脑膜炎的对照单盲临床试验

Cefotaxime versus penicillin-chloramphenicol in purulent meningitis: a controlled single-blind clinical trial.

作者信息

Haffejee I E

机构信息

R.K. Khan Hospital, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

Ann Trop Paediatr. 1988 Dec;8(4):225-9. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1988.11748576.

DOI:10.1080/02724936.1988.11748576
PMID:2467608
Abstract

In a prospective, controlled, randomized single-blind clinical trial, treatment with cefotaxime (CTX) was compared with that with standard therapy (ST), which consisted of a penicillin-chloramphenicol combination with or without sulphadiazine, in 31 patients (excluding neonates) with proven bacterial meningitis. The two groups of patients were comparable in age, sex, clinical presentation and causative pathogens. The case fatality rate was 12.5% for the CTX group and 20% for the ST group, but this difference was not significant. The times taken for the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to become sterile and the temperature to normalize, the mean duration of treatment, complications and adverse effects were similar for the two regimens. Neurological or developmental abnormalities on follow-up were not significantly different for the two groups. It is concluded that CTX is a suitable alternative for treatment of bacterial meningitis in infants and children.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、对照、随机单盲临床试验中,对31例(不包括新生儿)确诊为细菌性脑膜炎的患者,将头孢噻肟(CTX)治疗与标准疗法(ST)进行了比较,标准疗法包括青霉素 - 氯霉素联合用药,可加用或不加用磺胺嘧啶。两组患者在年龄、性别、临床表现和致病病原体方面具有可比性。CTX组的病死率为12.5%,ST组为20%,但差异无统计学意义。两种治疗方案使脑脊液(CSF)转为无菌状态的时间、体温恢复正常的时间、平均治疗持续时间、并发症及不良反应相似。两组随访时的神经或发育异常情况无显著差异。结论是CTX是治疗婴幼儿细菌性脑膜炎的合适替代药物。

相似文献

1
Cefotaxime versus penicillin-chloramphenicol in purulent meningitis: a controlled single-blind clinical trial.头孢噻肟与青霉素-氯霉素治疗化脓性脑膜炎的对照单盲临床试验
Ann Trop Paediatr. 1988 Dec;8(4):225-9. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1988.11748576.
2
Cefotaxime vs. conventional therapy for the treatment of bacterial meningitis of infants and children.头孢噻肟与传统疗法治疗婴幼儿细菌性脑膜炎的对比
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1986 Jul-Aug;5(4):402-7. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198607000-00005.
3
Prospective comparative trial of ceftriaxone vs. conventional therapy for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与传统疗法治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006.
4
Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in neonates and children: a review of microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, and clinical experience.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Jan-Feb;12(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90052-7.
5
Randomised comparison of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone for childhood bacterial meningitis. Finnish Study Group.氯霉素、氨苄西林、头孢噻肟和头孢曲松用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎的随机对照研究。芬兰研究小组。
Lancet. 1989 Jun 10;1(8650):1281-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92685-8.
6
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin and chloramphenicol for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与氨苄西林及氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的疗效比较
Lancet. 1983 Jun 4;1(8336):1241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92696-x.
7
Meningitis due to beta-lactamase producing, chloramphenicol-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type b, in South Africa.南非由产β-内酰胺酶、耐氯霉素的b型流感嗜血杆菌引起的脑膜炎。
J Infect. 1986 May;12(3):247-9. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(86)94242-8.
8
Meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae resistant to ampicillin and chloramphenicol.由对氨苄西林和氯霉素耐药的流感嗜血杆菌引起的脑膜炎。
Arch Dis Child. 1986 Nov;61(11):1134-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.61.11.1134.
9
Chloramphenicol alone versus chloramphenicol plus penicillin for bacterial meningitis in children.儿童细菌性脑膜炎单用氯霉素与氯霉素加青霉素的疗效比较
Lancet. 1985 Sep 28;2(8457):681-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92927-7.
10
Occurrence of multiple antimicrobial resistance among Haemophilus influenzae type b causing meningitis.
Indian J Med Res. 1992 Sep;95:230-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.第三代头孢菌素与传统抗生素治疗急性细菌性脑膜炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD001832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001832.pub3.
2
Childhood bacterial meningitis in Mbarara Hospital, Uganda: antimicrobial susceptibility and outcome of treatment.乌干达姆巴拉拉医院儿童细菌性脑膜炎:抗菌药物敏感性及治疗结果
Afr Health Sci. 2001 Aug;1(1):9-11.
3
Chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone, or both, as treatment for meningitis in developing countries?
在发展中国家,氯霉素或头孢曲松,或两者并用,可用于治疗脑膜炎吗?
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Jun;88(6):536-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.6.536.
4
Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.头孢噻肟。其药理学与治疗应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 1990 Oct;40(4):608-51. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040040-00008.
5
Cefotaxime dosage in infants and children. Pharmacokinetic and clinical rationale for an extended dosage interval.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992 Apr;22(4):284-97. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199222040-00004.