Suppr超能文献

公共场所吸烟禁令对主动吸烟有影响吗?来自英国的证据。

Do public smoking bans have an impact on active smoking? Evidence from the UK.

作者信息

Jones Andrew M, Laporte Audrey, Rice Nigel, Zucchelli Eugenio

机构信息

Department of Economics and Related Studies (DERS), University of York, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2015 Feb;24(2):175-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.3009. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

Abstract

The literature on the effects of public smoking bans on smoking behaviour presents conflicting results and there is limited evidence on their impact on active smoking. This paper evaluates the impact of smoking bans on active smoking using data from the British Household Panel Survey and exploiting the policy experiment provided by the differential timing of the introduction of the bans in Scotland and England. We assess the short-term impact of the smoking bans by employing a series of flexible difference-in-differences fixed effects panel data models. We find that the introduction of the public smoking bans in England and Scotland had limited short-run effects on both smoking prevalence and the total level of smoking. Although we identify significant differences in trends in smoking consumption across the survey period by population sub-groups, we find insufficient evidence to conclude that these were affected by the introduction of the smoking bans. These results challenge those found in the public health literature but are in line with the most recent strand of economic literature indicating that there is no firm evidence on the effects of smoking bans on smoking.

摘要

关于公共场所禁烟对吸烟行为影响的文献呈现出相互矛盾的结果,而且关于其对主动吸烟影响的证据有限。本文利用英国家庭调查面板数据,并借助苏格兰和英格兰实施禁烟政策时间不同所提供的政策试验,评估禁烟对主动吸烟的影响。我们通过一系列灵活的双重差分固定效应面板数据模型来评估禁烟的短期影响。我们发现,英格兰和苏格兰实施的公共场所禁烟对吸烟率和吸烟总量的短期影响有限。尽管我们确定了调查期间不同人群亚组在吸烟消费趋势上存在显著差异,但我们发现没有足够的证据得出这些差异受到禁烟政策影响的结论。这些结果与公共卫生文献中的发现相悖,但与最新的经济文献一致,表明没有确凿证据证明禁烟对吸烟有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验