• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度北部牙科专业人员对抄袭的认知与态度。

Knowledge and attitude of dental professionals of north India toward plagiarism.

作者信息

Singh Harkanwal Preet, Guram Namrata

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Dasmesh Institute of Research and Dental Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab, India.

Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Swami Devi Dyal Hospital and Dental College, Panchkula, Haryana, India.

出版信息

N Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jan;6(1):6-11. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.125854.

DOI:10.4103/1947-2714.125854
PMID:24678470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3938877/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Plagiarism is stealing of some others work or idea without proper citation. It is one of the biggest challenges faced by the scholarly world and by far a grim form of delinquency in academics.

AIM

The study was designed to explore the knowledge and attitudes of dental professionals toward plagiarism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire having 14 questions was sent either via e-mails or by sending printed copies to 5000 dental professionals, while maintaining anonymity of all the participants.

RESULT

Most of the dental professionals know about plagiarism, and they believe that plagiarism cannot be avoided successfully. Pressure to publish was a major reason along with several others, which accounts for more and more indulgence in plagiarism. At the same time lack of facilities in private institutions and lack of funding for research work were the major factors as well, which hinder in creating research environment and hence promotes plagiarism and false studies to publish it.

CONCLUSION

Plagiarism is present in dental professionals and that significant reduction can only be brought by awareness, objective check methods and stringent punishment. Plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct must be recognized and must not be tolerated.

摘要

背景

剽窃是指在未进行适当引用的情况下盗用他人的作品或想法。它是学术界面临的最大挑战之一,也是迄今为止学术界一种严重的违规行为。

目的

本研究旨在探讨牙科专业人员对剽窃的认知和态度。

材料与方法

通过电子邮件或邮寄打印版问卷的方式,向5000名牙科专业人员发放了一份包含14个问题的问卷,同时对所有参与者的信息进行保密。

结果

大多数牙科专业人员了解剽窃行为,并且他们认为剽窃难以被成功杜绝。除其他一些因素外,发表论文的压力是导致越来越多的人沉迷于剽窃的一个主要原因。与此同时,私立机构缺乏设施以及研究工作缺乏资金也是主要因素,这些因素阻碍了研究环境的营造,从而助长了剽窃行为以及为发表而进行的虚假研究。

结论

牙科专业人员中存在剽窃现象,只有通过提高意识、采用客观的检查方法和严厉的惩罚措施,才能显著减少剽窃行为。必须认识到剽窃及其他形式的学术不端行为,且绝不能容忍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/e2a4bd0a2f67/NAJMS-6-6-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/d7991831d478/NAJMS-6-6-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/61faedbdb766/NAJMS-6-6-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/7258e655ed24/NAJMS-6-6-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/e2a4bd0a2f67/NAJMS-6-6-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/d7991831d478/NAJMS-6-6-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/61faedbdb766/NAJMS-6-6-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/7258e655ed24/NAJMS-6-6-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ba/3938877/e2a4bd0a2f67/NAJMS-6-6-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge and attitude of dental professionals of north India toward plagiarism.印度北部牙科专业人员对抄袭的认知与态度。
N Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jan;6(1):6-11. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.125854.
2
Survey on attitude of dental professionals about plagiarism in Maharashtra, India.印度马哈拉施特拉邦牙科专业人员对抄袭行为态度的调查。
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_141_17.
3
Attitude of Indian dental professionals toward scientific publications: A questionnaire based study.印度牙科专业人员对科学出版物的态度:一项基于问卷调查的研究。
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015 Aug;6(Suppl 1):S118-22. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.166111.
4
Plagiarism: an egregious form of misconduct.剽窃:一种极其恶劣的不当行为。
N Am J Med Sci. 2015 Feb;7(2):77-80. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.152084.
5
Comparison of Opinion Referendum of Medical and Dental Postgraduates Towards Plagiarism in Bhopal - Central India.印度中部博帕尔市医学与牙科研究生对抄袭行为看法的全民公投比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Jul;25(7):514-8.
6
Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism.打击科研不端行为:专题研讨会在改变对抄袭态度方面的作用。
Cureus. 2018 May 28;10(5):e2698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2698.
7
Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.中国生物医学研究人员对学术不端行为的认知:2015 年与 2010 年的比较。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):629-645. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9913-3. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Extent of awareness and attitudes on plagiarism among post-graduate resident doctors and junior medical faculty in India: a cross-sectional, multicentric study.印度研究生住院医师和初级医学教师对剽窃的认知和态度的程度:一项横断面、多中心研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e046904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046904.
9
Attitudes towards plagiarism among academics of the faculty of Medicine of Tunis.突尼斯医学院学者对剽窃的态度。
Account Res. 2020 Nov;27(8):521-537. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1780426. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Knowledge and practices of plagiarism among journal editors of Nepal.尼泊尔期刊编辑中关于抄袭的认知与行为
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Aug 23;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00149-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Reviewing Academic Integrity: Assessing the Influence of Corrective Measures on Adverse Attitudes and Plagiaristic Behavior.审视学术诚信:评估纠正措施对负面态度和抄袭行为的影响。
J Acad Ethics. 2022 Dec 29:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10805-022-09467-z.
2
Extent of knowledge and attitudes on plagiarism among undergraduate medical students in South India - a multicentre, cross-sectional study to determine the need for incorporating research ethics in medical undergraduate curriculum.印度南部医学生对剽窃的认知和态度调查——一项多中心、横断面研究,旨在确定在医学本科课程中纳入研究伦理的必要性。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 18;22(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03438-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Writing for publication in a medical journal.撰写医学期刊发表文章。
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Nov;16(6):899-903. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.102988.
2
How to write your first research paper.如何撰写第一篇研究论文。
Yale J Biol Med. 2011 Sep;84(3):181-90.
3
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?科学文献中的撤稿:研究造假的发生率在增加吗?
Extent of awareness and attitudes on plagiarism among post-graduate resident doctors and junior medical faculty in India: a cross-sectional, multicentric study.
印度研究生住院医师和初级医学教师对剽窃的认知和态度的程度:一项横断面、多中心研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e046904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046904.
4
Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) - a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science.重新思考研究中的成功、诚信与文化(第二部分)——关于科学问题的多主体定性研究
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Jan 14;6(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00105-z.
5
Turnitin: Is it a text matching or plagiarism detection tool?Turnitin:它是一个文本匹配工具还是抄袭检测工具?
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S48-S51. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_772_18.
6
Survey on attitude of dental professionals about plagiarism in Maharashtra, India.印度马哈拉施特拉邦牙科专业人员对抄袭行为态度的调查。
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_141_17.
7
Rise of academic plagiarism in India: Reasons, solutions and resolution.印度学术抄袭现象的兴起:原因、解决方案与应对措施
Lung India. 2015 Sep-Oct;32(5):542-3. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.164151.
8
Exploring the attitudes of medical faculty members and students in Pakistan towards plagiarism: a cross sectional survey.探究巴基斯坦医学教员和学生对抄袭的态度:一项横断面调查。
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 18;3:e1031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1031. eCollection 2015.
9
Plagiarism: an egregious form of misconduct.剽窃:一种极其恶劣的不当行为。
N Am J Med Sci. 2015 Feb;7(2):77-80. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.152084.
10
A comprehensive comparative analysis of articles retracted in 2012 and 2013 from the scholarly literature.对2012年和2013年从学术文献中撤回的文章进行的全面比较分析。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;5(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.151968.
J Med Ethics. 2011 Apr;37(4):249-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040923. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
4
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?科学文献中的撤稿:作者是否故意从事研究欺诈?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038125. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
5
Plagiarism in scientific publications.科学出版物中的剽窃行为。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009 Feb 28;3(1):1-4. doi: 10.3855/jidc.98.
6
Self-plagiarism: unintentional, harmless, or fraud?自我剽窃:无意、无害还是欺诈行为?
Lancet. 2009 Aug 29;374(9691):664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61536-1.
7
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.一个用于量化个人科研产出的指标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
8
Special report: taking on the cheats.特别报道:打击作弊行为。
Nature. 2005 May 19;435(7040):258-9. doi: 10.1038/435258a.
9
Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students.医学生中抄袭行为的发生率。
Croat Med J. 2005 Feb;46(1):126-31.
10
Plagiarism.
J Assoc Physicians India. 2004 Jul;52:527-30.