Cui Lei, Drieghe Denis, Bai Xuejun, Yan Guoli, Liversedge Simon P
a Department of Psychology , Tianjin Normal University , Tianjin , China.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(11):2172-88. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.909858. Epub 2014 May 6.
In an eye movement experiment during reading, we compared parafoveal preview benefit during the reading of Chinese sentences either in the familiar, unspaced format or with spaces inserted between the words. Single-character words or the first of a two-character word were either presented normally or were replaced by a pseudocharacter in the preview. Results indicate that word spacing increased the parafoveal preview benefit but only for the one-character target words. We hypothesized that the incorrect preview of the first character of the two-character word prevented parafoveal processing of the ensuing character(s), effectively nullifying any benefits from the spacing. Our results suggest that word boundary demarcation allows for more precise focusing of attention.
在一项阅读过程中的眼动实验中,我们比较了阅读中文句子时,按照熟悉的、无空格格式阅读与在单词之间插入空格时的副中央凹预视效益。单字或双字词的首字在预视中要么正常呈现,要么被一个伪字替代。结果表明,单词间距增加了副中央凹预视效益,但仅针对单字目标词。我们推测,双字词首字的错误预视阻碍了后续字的副中央凹加工,有效地抵消了间距带来的任何益处。我们的结果表明,单词边界划分有助于更精确地聚焦注意力。