Rizvi Shireen L, Steffel Lauren M
a Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology , Rutgers University , Piscataway , New Jersey.
J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(6):434-9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.907298.
To examine the feasibility and initial efficacy of 2 abbreviated dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills training groups: emotion regulation skills only and emotion regulation with mindfulness skills.
Participants were 24 undergraduates (aged 18-29) with significant emotion dysregulation who participated between February and May of 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Participants participated in 2-hour weekly group sessions for 8 weeks and completed outcome measures at baseline, midtreatment, posttreatment, and 4-week follow-up.
Participants in both conditions made significant gains, with large effect sizes, across measures of emotion regulation, affect, skills use, and functioning. There were no differences between the 2 groups, suggesting no additive benefit of mindfulness skills.
This pilot study provides support for the acceptability and efficacy of abbreviated DBT skills training in colleges, given significant improvements, positive feedback, and low attrition. Impediments to feasibility included recruitment difficulties, particularly due to scheduling constraints.
考察两种简化的辩证行为疗法（DBT）技能训练组的可行性和初步疗效，即仅情绪调节技能组和情绪调节与正念技能组。
参与者为24名有显著情绪调节障碍的本科生（年龄在18 - 29岁之间），他们在2010年、2011年和2012年的2月至5月期间参与研究。
参与者每周参加2小时的小组课程，共8周，并在基线、治疗中期、治疗后和4周随访时完成结果测量。
两种情况下的参与者在情绪调节、情感、技能使用和功能等测量指标上均取得了显著进步，效应量较大。两组之间没有差异，表明正念技能没有额外的益处。
鉴于有显著改善、积极反馈和低流失率，这项初步研究为简化的DBT技能训练在大学中的可接受性和疗效提供了支持。可行性的障碍包括招募困难，特别是由于时间安排限制。
