Bassi Iara, Assunção Ada Ávila, Pimenta Adriano Marçal, Benavides Fernando G, Ubalde-Lopez Monica
Program of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG).
J Occup Health. 2016 May 25;58(2):179-85. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0121-OA. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
To describe the prevalence of sickness absence and to analyze factors associated with the outcome according to gender in a sample of healthcare workers at the Belo Horizonte Health Department.
This study was based on a Belo Horizonte Health Department survey carried out between September 2008 and January 2009. From a randomly selected sample of 2,205 workers, 1,808 agreed to participate. Workers were classified into Health Staff or Health Care. Other explanatory variables were social and demographic data, work characteristics, and personal health. The Poisson regression was applied to analyze factors associated with sickness absence by the prevalence ratio (PR).
The overall prevalence of sickness absence was 31.5% (23.8% for men and 34.6% for women). In the final model, we found higher rates of sickness absence in both male and female workers involved in tasks with high psychosocial demands (PR=1.86 men; PR=1.38 women) and in those that reported using medication for treating chronic diseases (PR=1.96 men; PR=1.50 women). Women having a permanent job contract had a higher prevalence of sickness absence than those having a temporary job contract (PR=1.71).
Our findings suggest a paradox in how healthcare is organized: good results in terms of its global objective of providing healthcare for citizens contrast with lack of effective measures for protecting healthcare workers.
描述贝洛奥里藏特卫生部医护人员样本中病假的患病率,并根据性别分析与该结果相关的因素。
本研究基于2008年9月至2009年1月在贝洛奥里藏特卫生部进行的一项调查。从随机抽取的2205名工人样本中,有1808人同意参与。工人被分为卫生工作人员或医疗保健人员。其他解释变量包括社会和人口数据、工作特征以及个人健康状况。采用泊松回归通过患病率比(PR)分析与病假相关的因素。
病假的总体患病率为31.5%(男性为23.8%,女性为34.6%)。在最终模型中,我们发现从事高心理社会需求任务的男性和女性工人的病假率较高(男性PR = 1.86;女性PR = 1.38),以及报告使用药物治疗慢性病的工人的病假率较高(男性PR = 1.96;女性PR = 1.50)。拥有长期工作合同的女性病假患病率高于拥有临时工作合同的女性(PR = 1.71)。
我们的研究结果表明医疗保健组织方式存在矛盾:在为公民提供医疗保健这一总体目标方面取得了良好成果,但在保护医护人员方面却缺乏有效措施。