• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻车并伴有抛出的车祸:致命组合——对719例患者的分析

Rollover car crashes with ejection: a deadly combination--an analysis of 719 patients.

作者信息

Latifi Rifat, El-Menyar Ayman, El-Hennawy Hany, Al-Thani Hassan

机构信息

Trauma Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar ; Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 245063, Tucson, AZ, USA ; Weill Cornell Medical College, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar.

Weill Cornell Medical College, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar ; Clinical Research, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad General Hospital, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 16;2014:250540. doi: 10.1155/2014/250540. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1155/2014/250540
PMID:24693231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3947784/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Rollover car crashes (ROCs) are serious public safety concerns worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and outcomes of ROCs with or without ejection of occupants in the State of Qatar.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients involved in ROCs admitted to Level I trauma center in Qatar (2011-2012). Patients were divided into Group I (ROC with ejection) and Group II (ROC without ejection).

RESULTS

A total of 719 patients were evaluated (237 in Group I and 482 in Group II). The mean age in Group I was lower than in Group II (24.3 ± 10.3 versus 29 ± 12.2; P = 0.001). Group I had higher injury severity score and sustained significantly more head, chest, and abdominal injuries in comparison to Group II. The mortality rate was higher in Group I (25% versus 7%; P = 0.001). Group I patients required higher ICU admission rate (P = 0.001). Patients in Group I had a 5-fold increased risk for age-adjusted mortality (OR 5.43; 95% CI 3.11-9.49), P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ROCs with ejection are associated with higher rate of morbidity and mortality compared to ROCs without ejection. As an increased number of young Qatari males sustain ROCs with ejection, these findings highlight the need for research-based injury prevention initiatives in the country.

摘要

未标注

翻车事故是全球严重的公共安全问题。

目的

确定卡塔尔国翻车事故中有无乘客弹出的发生率及后果。

方法

对卡塔尔一级创伤中心收治的所有翻车事故患者进行回顾性研究(2011 - 2012年)。患者分为第一组(有弹出的翻车事故)和第二组(无弹出的翻车事故)。

结果

共评估719例患者(第一组237例,第二组482例)。第一组的平均年龄低于第二组(24.3±10.3对29±12.2;P = 0.001)。与第二组相比,第一组的损伤严重程度评分更高,头部、胸部和腹部损伤明显更多。第一组的死亡率更高(25%对7%;P = 0.001)。第一组患者的重症监护病房收治率更高(P = 0.001)。第一组患者经年龄调整后的死亡风险增加了5倍(比值比5.43;95%可信区间3.11 - 9.49),P = 0.001)。

结论

与无弹出的翻车事故相比,有弹出的翻车事故的发病率和死亡率更高。由于越来越多的卡塔尔年轻男性发生有弹出的翻车事故,这些发现凸显了该国开展基于研究的伤害预防举措的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0338/3947784/b97cc4a31e78/TSWJ2014-250540.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0338/3947784/b97cc4a31e78/TSWJ2014-250540.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0338/3947784/b97cc4a31e78/TSWJ2014-250540.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Rollover car crashes with ejection: a deadly combination--an analysis of 719 patients.翻车并伴有抛出的车祸:致命组合——对719例患者的分析
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 16;2014:250540. doi: 10.1155/2014/250540. eCollection 2014.
2
Underutilization of occupant restraint systems in motor vehicle injury crashes: A quantitative analysis from Qatar.卡塔尔机动车伤害事故中驾乘人员约束系统使用不足的定量分析
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(3):284-91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1069820. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
3
Thoracolumbar junction injuries after rollover crashes: difference between belted and unbelted front seat occupants.翻车事故后胸腰段交界处损伤:系安全带与未系安全带的前排乘客之间的差异
Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1464-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1135-1. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
Seatbelt use in Qatar in association with severe injuries and death in the prehospital setting.卡塔尔院前环境中安全带使用与重伤和死亡的关联。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):547-52. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00006397.
5
Rollover injury in vehicles with high-strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) roofs, curtain and side airbags, and other safety improvements.在配备高强度重量比(SWR)车顶、窗帘式和侧面安全气囊以及其他安全改进措施的车辆中的翻滚损伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):734-740. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1482489. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Incidence and severity of head and neck injuries in victims of road traffic crashes: In an economically developed country.道路交通碰撞受害者头颈部损伤的发生率和严重程度:在一个经济发达国家。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jan;17(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
7
Head injuries to restrained occupants in single-vehicle pure rollover crashes.约束乘客在单车纯翻滚碰撞中的头部损伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(4):360-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.722735.
8
Causes and costs of injuries in multiple trauma patients requiring extrication from motor vehicle crashes.需要从机动车碰撞事故中解救出来的多发伤患者的损伤原因及费用
J Trauma. 1993 Dec;35(6):920-31. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199312000-00019.
9
Seat belt use before and after motor vehicle trauma.机动车创伤前后安全带的使用情况。
J Trauma. 2001 Jul;51(1):105-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200107000-00017.
10
Analysis of motor vehicle ejection victims admitted to a level I trauma center.对入住一级创伤中心的机动车弹出伤员的分析。
J Trauma. 2001 Nov;51(5):854-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200111000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Motor Vehicle Safety - Has Technology and Legislation Made a Difference?机动车安全——技术与立法带来改变了吗?
Curr Trauma Rep. 2025;11(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s40719-025-00282-6. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
New cars on the highways: Trends in injuries and outcomes following ejection.高速公路上的新车:弹射后的损伤及预后趋势
Surg Open Sci. 2019 Oct 22;2(1):22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2019.08.004. eCollection 2020 Jan.
3
Pediatric road traffic injuries in Qatar: Evidence for a developmental stage approach to road safety.卡塔尔的儿童道路交通伤害:采用发展阶段方法促进道路安全的证据

本文引用的文献

1
A cross "ethnical" comparison of the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ) in an economically fast developing country.在一个经济快速发展的国家对驾驶员行为问卷(DBQ)进行跨“种族”比较。
Glob J Health Sci. 2013 May 12;5(4):165-75. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n4p165.
2
Factors affecting ejection risk in rollover crashes.翻车事故中影响弹射风险的因素。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:203-11.
3
The influence of occupant anthropometry and seat position on ejection risk in a rollover.在翻滚中,乘客人体测量学和座椅位置对弹射风险的影响。
Qatar Med J. 2020 Mar 2;2020(1):3. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2020.3. eCollection 2020.
4
Applying the five-pillar matrix to the decade of action for road safety in Qatar: identifying gaps and priorities.将五支柱矩阵应用于卡塔尔道路安全行动十年:识别差距与优先事项。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Dec 19;3(1):e000233. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000233. eCollection 2018.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Aug;11(4):417-24. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2010.485284.
4
Mortality and injury patterns associated with roof crush in rollover crashes.翻滚碰撞中车顶挤压相关的死亡率和损伤模式。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1326-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
5
Implications of vehicle roll direction on occupant ejection and injury risk.车辆翻滚方向对乘员弹出及受伤风险的影响
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006;50:155-70.
6
Learning from evidence in a complex world.从复杂世界中的证据中学习。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):505-14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066043. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
7
The neglected epidemic: road traffic accidents in a developing country, State of Qatar.被忽视的流行病:卡塔尔国这个发展中国家的道路交通事故
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2005 Mar;12(1):45-7. doi: 10.1080/1745730051233142225.
8
Ejections of young children in motor vehicle crashes.幼儿在机动车碰撞事故中的弹出情况。
J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):126-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000037335.24174.28.
9
Relative risk of death from ejection by crash type and crash mode.按碰撞类型和碰撞模式划分的弹射死亡相对风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 1989 Oct;21(5):459-68. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(89)90006-7.