• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科患者对一种自行操作的自动化病史采集设备的印象及满意度。

Patient impression and satisfaction of a self-administered, automated medical history-taking device in the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Arora Sanjay, Goldberg Andrew D, Menchine Michael

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;15(1):35-40. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.2.11498.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2013.2.11498
PMID:24695871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3952887/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated patient impressions and satisfaction of an innovative self-administered, hand-held touch-screen tablet to gather detailed medical information from emergency department (ED) patients in the waiting room prior to physician contact.

METHODS

Adult, medically stable patients presenting to the ED at Los Angeles County Hospital used the PatientTouch™ system to answer a series of questions about their current history of present illness and past medical/surgical histories in English or Spanish. Patients then completed a survey rating their experience.

RESULTS

Among 173 participants, opinion of PatientTouch™ was strongly positive; 93.6% (95%CI 90.0-97.3%) felt the physical product was easy to hold and handle, and 97.1% (94.6-99.6%) felt the questions were detailed enough for them to fully describe their condition; 97.8% (95.4-100.0%) felt using PatientTouch™ would help them organize their thoughts and communicate better with their physician, 94.8% (91.4-98.1%) thought it would improve the quality of their care, and 97.1% (94.6-99.6%) expressed desire to use the product again in the future.

CONCLUSION

The study was conducted at a largely Hispanic county ED, and only patients with 1 of 6 pre-determined chief complaints participated. We did not include a control group to assess if perceived improvements in communication translated to measurable differences. In this pilot study, patients were highly satisfied with all aspects of the PatientTouch™ self-administered, hand-held, touch-screen tablet. Importantly, subjects felt it would help them better communicate with their doctor, would improve their overall quality of care and overwhelmingly expressed a desire to use it in the future.

摘要

引言

我们评估了患者对一种创新的自助式手持触摸屏平板电脑的印象和满意度,该平板电脑用于在患者与医生接触之前,在急诊室(ED)候诊室收集患者的详细医疗信息。

方法

在洛杉矶县医院急诊科就诊的成年、病情稳定的患者使用PatientTouch™系统,用英语或西班牙语回答一系列关于他们当前现病史和既往医疗/手术史的问题。然后患者完成一项对其体验进行评分的调查。

结果

在173名参与者中,对PatientTouch™的评价非常积极;93.6%(95%CI 90.0 - 97.3%)的人认为该实体产品易于握持和操作,97.1%(94.6 - 99.6%)的人认为问题足够详细,足以让他们充分描述自己的病情;97.8%(95.4 - 100.0%)的人认为使用PatientTouch™有助于他们整理思路并与医生更好地沟通,94.8%(91.4 - 98.1%)的人认为这会提高他们的护理质量,97.1%(94.6 - 99.6%)的人表示希望未来再次使用该产品。

结论

该研究在一个主要为西班牙裔的县急诊科进行,且只有6种预先确定的主要症状之一的患者参与。我们没有设立对照组来评估沟通方面的感知改善是否转化为可衡量的差异。在这项初步研究中,患者对PatientTouch™自助式手持触摸屏平板电脑的各个方面都非常满意。重要的是,受试者认为它将帮助他们更好地与医生沟通,会提高他们的整体护理质量,并且绝大多数人表示希望未来使用它。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c010/3952887/69fc0767c97d/i1936-900X-15-1-35-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c010/3952887/69fc0767c97d/i1936-900X-15-1-35-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c010/3952887/69fc0767c97d/i1936-900X-15-1-35-f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient impression and satisfaction of a self-administered, automated medical history-taking device in the Emergency Department.急诊科患者对一种自行操作的自动化病史采集设备的印象及满意度。
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;15(1):35-40. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.2.11498.
2
Patient-directed intelligent and interactive computer medical history-gathering systems: a utility and feasibility study in the emergency department.面向患者的智能交互式计算机病史采集系统:急诊科的效用和可行性研究
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Apr;76(4):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
3
A pilot study of patient satisfaction with a self-completed tablet-based digital questionnaire for collecting the patient's medical history in an emergency department.一项关于患者对在急诊科使用平板电脑自行完成数字问卷收集病史的满意度的初步研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 30;21(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06748-y.
4
Use of a bilingual medical history questionnaire in the emergency department.在急诊科使用双语病史调查问卷。
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 May;22(5):824-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80799-1.
5
Controlled trial of a patient-completed history questionnaire: effects on quality of documentation and patient and physician satisfaction.患者填写病史问卷的对照试验:对文档质量以及患者和医生满意度的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):126-35. doi: 10.1177/106286060201700402.
6
Impact of language barriers on patient satisfaction in an emergency department.语言障碍对急诊科患者满意度的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Feb;14(2):82-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00293.x.
7
Perceptions and satisfaction with emergency department care.
J Emerg Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;14(6):679-83. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(96)00176-x.
8
Adolescent satisfaction in an urban pediatric emergency department.城市儿科急诊科中青少年的满意度。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jul;28(7):633-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825cfaf5.
9
Patient perceptions of emergency department fast track: a prospective pilot study comparing two models of care.患者对急诊科快速通道的认知:一项比较两种护理模式的前瞻性试点研究
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014 Aug;17(3):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
10
Use of Self-Reported Computerized Medical History Taking for Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department - the Clinical Expert Operating System Chest Pain Danderyd Study (CLEOS-CPDS): Prospective Cohort Study.使用自我报告的计算机化医疗史采集进行急诊科急性胸痛诊断 - 临床专家操作系统胸痛丹代尔研究(CLEOS-CPDS):前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 27;23(4):e25493. doi: 10.2196/25493.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the time-efficiency of initial mental health assessment (triaging) using an online assessment tool followed by a clinical interview via phone: a randomised controlled trial.使用在线评估工具随后通过电话进行临床访谈来提高初始心理健康评估(分诊)的时间效率:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07023-8.
2
Patient Perspectives on Digital Technology and Experiences of Computerized History-Taking for Chest Pain Management in the Emergency Department: CLEOS-CPDS Prospective Cohort Study.患者对急诊科胸痛管理中数字技术的看法及计算机化病史采集体验:CLEOS-CPDS前瞻性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 17;13:e65568. doi: 10.2196/65568.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patients providing the answers: narrowing the gap in data quality for emergency care.提供答案的患者:缩小急诊护理数据质量的差距。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e34. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032540. Epub 2010 May 27.
2
Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors?电子临床文档能帮助预防诊断错误吗?
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25;362(12):1066-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911734.
3
Approaches to reducing the most important patient errors in primary health-care: patient and professional perspectives.减少初级卫生保健中最重要的患者错误的方法:患者和专业人员的观点。
Evaluation and significance of a digital assistant for patient history-taking and physical examination in telemedicine.
远程医疗中用于患者病史采集和体格检查的数字助手的评估及意义
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 Feb 2;2:oqae008. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae008. eCollection 2024.
4
Performance of computerized self-reported medical history taking and HEAR score for safe early rule-out of cardiac events in acute chest pain patients: the CLEOS-CPDS prospective cohort study.计算机化自我报告病史采集及HEAR评分在急性胸痛患者心脏事件安全早期排除中的应用:CLEOS-CPDS前瞻性队列研究
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Nov 12;6(1):104-114. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae087. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Computer-assisted medical history taking prior to patient consultation in the outpatient care setting: a prospective pilot project.门诊护理环境中患者咨询前的计算机辅助病史采集:一项前瞻性试点项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1616. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12043-3.
6
Concordance of data collected by an app for medical history taking and in-person interviews from patients in primary care.一款用于采集病史的应用程序所收集的数据与基层医疗中对患者进行的面对面访谈数据的一致性。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Oct 7;7(4):ooae102. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae102. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Person-based design and evaluation of MIA, a digital medical interview assistant for radiology.基于人的MIA设计与评估,一种用于放射学的数字医学访谈助手。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Aug 16;7:1431156. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1431156. eCollection 2024.
8
Preserving Patient Stories: Bioethical and Legal Implications Related to the Shift from Traditional to Digital Anamnesis.保留患者故事:从传统病历到数字病历转变的生物伦理与法律影响
Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 21;14(4):1196-1213. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14040095.
9
Are medical history data fit for risk stratification of patients with chest pain in emergency care? Comparing data collected from patients using computerized history taking with data documented by physicians in the electronic health record in the CLEOS-CPDS prospective cohort study.在急诊医疗中,病史数据是否适合胸痛患者的风险分层?在 CLEOS-CPDS 前瞻性队列研究中,比较使用计算机采集病史的患者数据与电子病历中医生记录的数据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jun 20;31(7):1529-1539. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae110.
10
Usability of an App for Medical History Taking in General Practice From the Patients' Perspective: Cross-Sectional Study.从患者角度看全科医疗中使用医疗史采集应用程序的可用性:横断面研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 5;11:e47755. doi: 10.2196/47755.
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 May;18(3):296-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00904.x. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
4
Inter-rater reliability of historical data collected by non-medical research assistants and physicians in patients with acute abdominal pain.非医学研究助理和医生收集的急性腹痛患者的历史数据的观察者间可靠性。
West J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;10(1):30-6.
5
Optimizing emergency department front-end operations.优化急诊部门前端运作。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;55(2):142-160.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
6
Patient error: a preliminary taxonomy.患者失误:初步分类法。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;7(3):223-31. doi: 10.1370/afm.941.
7
Physician variability in history taking when evaluating patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department.
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):147-52. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.007. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
8
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
9
The asthma kiosk: a patient-centered technology for collaborative decision support in the emergency department.哮喘信息亭:一种用于急诊科协作决策支持的以患者为中心的技术。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec;11(6):458-67. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1569. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
10
Patient-doctor communication.医患沟通。
Med Clin North Am. 2003 Sep;87(5):1115-45. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(03)00066-x.