Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林与华法林治疗合并主动脉弓斑块的缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较

Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus warfarin in patients with stroke and aortic arch plaques.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology, Stroke Centre, DHU FIRE, INSERM U 1148, Paris Diderot-Sorbonne University, Hôpital Bichat (P.A.), Department of Cardiology, Saint-Antoine Hospital and Medical School, Univeristé Pierre et Marie Curie (A.A.C.), and Department of Biostatistics, Paris-Diderot-Sorbonne University, Hôpital Bichat (C.L.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital (S.D.) and Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (D.Y., M.M., G.A.D.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia (E.F.J.); Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, Cologne, Germany (W.-D.H.); Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (M.K.); Stroke and Ageing Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (D.Y.); and Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh (SC005336), Scotland, United Kingdom (M.M.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2014 May;45(5):1248-57. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004251. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Severe atherosclerosis in the aortic arch is associated with a high risk of recurrent vascular events, but the optimal antithrombotic strategy is unclear.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled, open-labeled trial, with blinded end point evaluation (PROBE design) tested superiority of aspirin 75 to 150 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d (A+C) over warfarin therapy (international normalized ratio 2-3) in patients with ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral embolism with plaque in the thoracic aorta>4 mm and no other identified embolic source. The primary end point included cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, peripheral embolism, vascular death, or intracranial hemorrhage. Follow-up visits occurred at 1 month and then every 4 months post randomization.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped after 349 patients were randomized during a period of 8 years and 3 months. After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the primary end point occurred in 7.6% (13/172) and 11.3% (20/177) of patients on A+C and on warfarin, respectively (log-rank, P=0.2). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.61; P=0.5). Major hemorrhages including intracranial hemorrhages occurred in 4 and 6 patients in the A+C and warfarin groups, respectively. Vascular deaths occurred in 0 patients in A+C arm compared with 6 (3.4%) patients in the warfarin arm (log-rank, P=0.013). Time in therapeutic range (67% of the time for international normalized ratio 2-3) analysis by tertiles showed no significant differences across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of lack of power, this trial was inconclusive and results should be taken as hypothesis generating.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00235248.

摘要

背景与目的

主动脉弓严重粥样硬化与复发性血管事件风险增加相关,但最佳抗栓策略尚不清楚。

方法

这项前瞻性随机对照、开放标签、终点评估设盲的 PROBE 设计临床试验,旨在比较阿司匹林 75150 mg/d 加氯吡格雷 75 mg/d(A+C)与华法林治疗(国际标准化比值 23)在伴有胸主动脉斑块>4 mm 且无其他明确栓塞源的缺血性卒、短暂性脑缺血发作或外周动脉栓塞患者中的疗效。主要终点包括脑梗死、心肌梗死、外周栓塞、血管性死亡或颅内出血。随机分组后 1 个月及之后每 4 个月随访一次。

结果

在 8 年零 3 个月期间共纳入 349 例患者,随后试验提前终止。中位随访 3.4 年后,A+C 组和华法林组分别有 7.6%(13/172)和 11.3%(20/177)的患者发生主要终点事件(对数秩检验,P=0.2)。调整后的风险比为 0.76(95%置信区间,0.361.61;P=0.5)。A+C 组和华法林组分别有 4 例和 6 例患者发生大出血(包括颅内出血)。A+C 组无血管性死亡,而华法林组有 6 例(3.4%)患者发生血管性死亡(对数秩检验,P=0.013)。按国际标准化比值 23 的三分位数进行治疗达标时间(67%时间处于治疗范围内)分析,各组间无显著差异。

结论

由于缺乏统计学效能,本试验结果不确定,只能作为假说产生的依据。

临床试验注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00235248。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验