Suppr超能文献

荷兰围产期保健专业人员对“中度风险”指征分娩期整合照护的看法:一项德尔菲研究

Opinions of maternity care professionals about integration of care during labor for "moderate risk" indications: a Delphi study in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Perdok Hilde, Mokkink Lidwine, van Dillen Jeroen, Westerneng Myrte, Jans Suze, Mol Ben Willem, de Jonge Ank

机构信息

Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Birth. 2014 Jun;41(2):195-205. doi: 10.1111/birt.12102. Epub 2014 Apr 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The percentage of referrals during labor from primary midwife-led care to obstetrician-led care has increased over the past years in The Netherlands. Most women are referred for indications with a moderate increase in risk and are looked after by clinical midwives. This study aims to provide insight into the opinions of maternity care professionals about integration of care and involvement of primary care midwives in the intrapartum care of women with "moderate risk" factors.

METHODS

A Delphi study consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogenic panel of 50 professionals, including obstetricians, primary care midwives, clinical midwives, and obstetric nurses, answered questions anonymously.

RESULTS

Although primary care midwives would like to expand their responsibilities and tasks with respect to "moderate risk" indications, consensus among panel members was only reached concerning prolonged rupture of membranes for which the primary care midwife could remain the caregiver.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that most participants support more integration of care during labor. The lack of consensus among Dutch maternity care professionals with regard to the distribution of responsibilities and tasks for "moderate risk" indications is a challenge. Further studies should explore how to deal with differences in opinions among professionals when integrating maternity care systems.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,过去几年中,分娩期间从初级助产士主导的护理转诊至产科医生主导的护理的比例有所增加。大多数女性因风险适度增加的指征而被转诊,并由临床助产士照料。本研究旨在深入了解产科护理专业人员对于护理整合以及初级护理助产士参与“中度风险”因素女性分娩期护理的看法。

方法

开展了一项包括三轮的德尔菲研究。一个由50名专业人员组成的经过有目的选择的异质性小组,包括产科医生、初级护理助产士、临床助产士和产科护士,匿名回答问题。

结果

尽管初级护理助产士希望在“中度风险”指征方面扩大其职责和任务,但小组成员仅就胎膜早破达成了共识,对于胎膜早破,初级护理助产士可继续作为照料者。

结论

本研究表明,大多数参与者支持分娩期间护理的更多整合。荷兰产科护理专业人员在“中度风险”指征的责任和任务分配方面缺乏共识是一项挑战。进一步的研究应探索在整合产科护理系统时如何应对专业人员之间的意见分歧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验