Suppr超能文献

锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)多平面和三维重建上头颅测量标志点识别的评估。

Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.

作者信息

Neiva Marcelo Baião da, Soares Álvaro Cavalheiro, Lisboa Cinthia de Oliveira, Vilella Oswaldo de Vasconcellos, Motta Alexandre Trindade

机构信息

a  Former Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):11-7. doi: 10.2319/120413-891.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) landmark identification in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using two different visualization techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve CBCT images were randomly selected. Three observers independently repeated three times the identification of 30 landmarks using 3D reconstructions and 28 landmarks using multiplanar views. The values of the coordinates X, Y, and Z of each point were obtained and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated.

RESULTS

The ICC of the 3D visualization was rated >0.90 in 67.76% and 45.56%, and ≤0.45 in 13.33% and 14.46% of the intraobserver and interobserver assessments, respectively. The ICC of the multiplanar visualization was rated >0.90 in 82.16% and 78.56% and ≤0.45 in only 16.7% and 8.33% of the intraobserver and interobserver assessments, respectively. An individual landmark classification was done according to ICC values.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of highly reliable values was greater for multiplanar than 3D reconstructions. Overall, lower reliability was found for points on the condyle and higher reliability for those on the midsagittal plane. Depending on the anatomic region, the observer must choose the most reliable type of image visualization.

摘要

目的

使用两种不同的可视化技术评估锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中三维(3D)标志点识别的可靠性。

材料与方法

随机选取12幅CBCT图像。三名观察者分别使用3D重建独立重复识别30个标志点三次,使用多平面视图独立重复识别28个标志点三次。获取每个点的X、Y和Z坐标值,并计算组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

在观察者内和观察者间评估中,3D可视化的ICC分别有67.76%和45.56%被评为>0.90,分别有13.33%和14.46%被评为≤0.45。多平面可视化的ICC在观察者内和观察者间评估中分别有82.16%和78.56%被评为>0.90,分别只有16.7%和8.33%被评为≤0.45。根据ICC值进行了单个标志点分类。

结论

多平面可视化的高可靠性值出现频率高于3D重建。总体而言,髁突上的点可靠性较低,矢状中面上的点可靠性较高。根据解剖区域,观察者必须选择最可靠的图像可视化类型。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Computerized three-dimensional cephalometric template for Thai adults.泰国成年人的计算机化三维头影测量模板。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15077. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Median Lingual Foramen, a new midmandibular cephalometric landmark.舌骨正中孔:一个新的下颌骨头部测量标志点。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Aug;23(3):357-361. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12372. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验