Suppr超能文献

锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)多平面和三维重建上头颅测量标志点识别的评估。

Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.

作者信息

Neiva Marcelo Baião da, Soares Álvaro Cavalheiro, Lisboa Cinthia de Oliveira, Vilella Oswaldo de Vasconcellos, Motta Alexandre Trindade

机构信息

a  Former Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):11-7. doi: 10.2319/120413-891.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) landmark identification in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using two different visualization techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve CBCT images were randomly selected. Three observers independently repeated three times the identification of 30 landmarks using 3D reconstructions and 28 landmarks using multiplanar views. The values of the coordinates X, Y, and Z of each point were obtained and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated.

RESULTS

The ICC of the 3D visualization was rated >0.90 in 67.76% and 45.56%, and ≤0.45 in 13.33% and 14.46% of the intraobserver and interobserver assessments, respectively. The ICC of the multiplanar visualization was rated >0.90 in 82.16% and 78.56% and ≤0.45 in only 16.7% and 8.33% of the intraobserver and interobserver assessments, respectively. An individual landmark classification was done according to ICC values.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of highly reliable values was greater for multiplanar than 3D reconstructions. Overall, lower reliability was found for points on the condyle and higher reliability for those on the midsagittal plane. Depending on the anatomic region, the observer must choose the most reliable type of image visualization.

摘要

目的

使用两种不同的可视化技术评估锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中三维(3D)标志点识别的可靠性。

材料与方法

随机选取12幅CBCT图像。三名观察者分别使用3D重建独立重复识别30个标志点三次,使用多平面视图独立重复识别28个标志点三次。获取每个点的X、Y和Z坐标值,并计算组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

在观察者内和观察者间评估中,3D可视化的ICC分别有67.76%和45.56%被评为>0.90,分别有13.33%和14.46%被评为≤0.45。多平面可视化的ICC在观察者内和观察者间评估中分别有82.16%和78.56%被评为>0.90,分别只有16.7%和8.33%被评为≤0.45。根据ICC值进行了单个标志点分类。

结论

多平面可视化的高可靠性值出现频率高于3D重建。总体而言,髁突上的点可靠性较低,矢状中面上的点可靠性较高。根据解剖区域,观察者必须选择最可靠的图像可视化类型。

相似文献

2
Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Sep;84(5):762-72. doi: 10.2319/090413-652.1. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
5
Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):98-103. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114958.
6
Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0688-2. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
9

引用本文的文献

3
Feasibility of craniofacial landmark plotting on magnetic resonance images.
Odontology. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01077-6.
4
Concordance and reproducibility in the location of reference points for a volumetric craniofacial analysis: Cross-sectional study.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023 Spring;17(2):87-95. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2023.37025. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
5
Computerized three-dimensional cephalometric template for Thai adults.
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15077. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15077. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Median Lingual Foramen, a new midmandibular cephalometric landmark.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 Aug;23(3):357-361. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12372. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

2
A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e678-88. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17721.
3
Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT-based 3D images: an in vitro study.
J Orofac Orthop. 2011 Aug;72(4):261-78. doi: 10.1007/s00056-011-0032-5. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
4
Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):38-44. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr050. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
5
Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):263-75. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq144. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
6
Three-dimensional regional displacements after mandibular advancement surgery: one year of follow-up.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;69(5):1447-57. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.018. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
9
Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.018.
10
Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;38(3):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验