Neiva Marcelo Baião da, Soares Álvaro Cavalheiro, Lisboa Cinthia de Oliveira, Vilella Oswaldo de Vasconcellos, Motta Alexandre Trindade
a Former Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):11-7. doi: 10.2319/120413-891.1.
To evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) landmark identification in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using two different visualization techniques.
Twelve CBCT images were randomly selected. Three observers independently repeated three times the identification of 30 landmarks using 3D reconstructions and 28 landmarks using multiplanar views. The values of the coordinates X, Y, and Z of each point were obtained and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated.
The ICC of the 3D visualization was rated >0.90 in 67.76% and 45.56%, and ≤0.45 in 13.33% and 14.46% of the intraobserver and interobserver assessments, respectively. The ICC of the multiplanar visualization was rated >0.90 in 82.16% and 78.56% and ≤0.45 in only 16.7% and 8.33% of the intraobserver and interobserver assessments, respectively. An individual landmark classification was done according to ICC values.
The frequency of highly reliable values was greater for multiplanar than 3D reconstructions. Overall, lower reliability was found for points on the condyle and higher reliability for those on the midsagittal plane. Depending on the anatomic region, the observer must choose the most reliable type of image visualization.
使用两种不同的可视化技术评估锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中三维(3D)标志点识别的可靠性。
随机选取12幅CBCT图像。三名观察者分别使用3D重建独立重复识别30个标志点三次,使用多平面视图独立重复识别28个标志点三次。获取每个点的X、Y和Z坐标值,并计算组内相关系数(ICC)。
在观察者内和观察者间评估中,3D可视化的ICC分别有67.76%和45.56%被评为>0.90,分别有13.33%和14.46%被评为≤0.45。多平面可视化的ICC在观察者内和观察者间评估中分别有82.16%和78.56%被评为>0.90,分别只有16.7%和8.33%被评为≤0.45。根据ICC值进行了单个标志点分类。
多平面可视化的高可靠性值出现频率高于3D重建。总体而言,髁突上的点可靠性较低,矢状中面上的点可靠性较高。根据解剖区域,观察者必须选择最可靠的图像可视化类型。