• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三羟甲基氨基甲烷用于控制颅内压。

THAM for control of ICP.

作者信息

Zeiler F A, Teitelbaum J, Gillman L M, West M

机构信息

Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada,

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2014 Oct;21(2):332-44. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9978-7.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-014-9978-7
PMID:24715327
Abstract

Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of tromethamine (THAM) and its effects on intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with neurological illness. All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to February 2014), reference lists of relevant articles, and gray literature were searched. Two reviewers independently identified all manuscripts pertaining to the administration of THAM in human patients that recorded effects on ICP. Secondary outcomes of effect on cerebral perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure, patient outcome, and adverse effects were recorded. Two reviewers independently extracted data including population characteristics and treatment characteristics. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology. Our search strategy produced a total 2,268 citations. Twelve articles, 9 manuscripts, and 3 meeting proceedings were considered for the review with all utilizing THAM while documenting ICP in neurosurgical patients. All studies were prospective. Across all studies, there were a total of 488 patients studied, with 263 receiving THAM and 225 serving as controls in a variety of heterogeneous studies. All but one study documented a decrease in ICP with THAM administration, with both bolus and continuous infusions. One study documented a reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure. No significant renal dysfunction, hepatocellular injury, or hypoglycemia were reported. Three prospective randomized control trials displayed trends to improved outcome in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with THAM administration. There currently exists Oxford level 2b, GRADE B evidence to support that THAM reduces ICP in the TBI and malignant ischemic infarct population, with minimal side effects. The literature suggests THAM may be useful for ICP reduction in certain cases, though the safety of the compound in these circumstances is still unclear. Further prospective study is warranted.

摘要

我们的目标是对有关氨丁三醇(THAM)的使用及其对神经系统疾病患者颅内压(ICP)影响的文献进行系统综述。检索了MEDLINE、BIOSIS、EMBASE、Global Health、HealthStar、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆、国际临床试验注册平台(截至2014年2月)的所有文章、相关文章的参考文献列表以及灰色文献。两名评审员独立识别了所有与在人类患者中给予THAM并记录其对ICP影响的手稿。记录了对脑灌注压、平均动脉压、患者预后和不良反应的次要影响结果。两名评审员独立提取了包括人群特征和治疗特征的数据。使用牛津方法和GRADE方法对证据强度进行了判定。我们的检索策略共产生了2268条引文。有12篇文章、9篇手稿和3篇会议记录被纳入综述,所有这些都使用了THAM并记录了神经外科患者的ICP。所有研究均为前瞻性研究。在所有研究中,共有488名患者接受研究,其中263名接受THAM治疗,225名在各种不同的研究中作为对照。除一项研究外,所有研究均记录了给予THAM(推注和持续输注)后ICP降低。一项研究记录了脑灌注压降低。未报告明显的肾功能障碍、肝细胞损伤或低血糖。三项前瞻性随机对照试验显示,给予THAM的重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者有预后改善的趋势。目前有牛津2b级、GRADE B级证据支持THAM可降低TBI和恶性缺血性梗死患者的ICP,且副作用最小。文献表明,THAM在某些情况下可能有助于降低ICP,尽管该化合物在这些情况下的安全性仍不清楚。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究。

相似文献

1
THAM for control of ICP.三羟甲基氨基甲烷用于控制颅内压。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Oct;21(2):332-44. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9978-7.
2
The ketamine effect on ICP in traumatic brain injury.氯胺酮对创伤性脑损伤患者颅内压的影响。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Aug;21(1):163-73. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9950-y.
3
Indomethacin for control of ICP.吲哚美辛用于控制颅内压。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Jun;22(3):437-49. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0088-3.
4
Burst Suppression for ICP Control.用于颅内压控制的爆发抑制
J Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;32(2):130-139. doi: 10.1177/0885066615593939. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
5
Sodium Bicarbonate for Control of ICP: A Systematic Review.碳酸氢钠治疗颅内压升高的疗效:系统评价
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan;30(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000373.
6
The ketamine effect on intracranial pressure in nontraumatic neurological illness.氯胺酮对非创伤性神经系统疾病颅内压的影响。
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):1096-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
7
Progesterone for acute traumatic brain injury.孕酮用于急性创伤性脑损伤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 22;12(12):CD008409. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008409.pub4.
8
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
9
Routine intracranial pressure monitoring in acute coma.急性昏迷患者的常规颅内压监测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 2;2015(11):CD002043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002043.pub3.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a piglet model for cerebrovascular autoregulation assessment with altered PaCO.建立用于评估 PaCO 改变时脑血管自动调节功能的仔猪模型。
Brain Spine. 2024 May 7;4:102833. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102833. eCollection 2024.
2
The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map.颅脑创伤急性期中重度管理的系统评价的货币、完整性和质量:全面证据图谱。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0198676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198676. eCollection 2018.
3
Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure: Is the Multiparameter Model Better Suited to Estimate Physiology of Cerebral Hemodynamics?

本文引用的文献

1
Physiological carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, and pH sensing.生理二氧化碳、碳酸氢盐和 pH 值感应。
Pflugers Arch. 2010 Nov;460(6):953-64. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0865-6. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
2
Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: past experience and current developments.颅脑创伤的临床试验:既往经验与当前进展。
Neurotherapeutics. 2010 Jan;7(1):115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.022.
3
Aquaporin-1-mediated cerebral edema following traumatic brain injury: effects of acidosis and corticosteroid administration.创伤性脑损伤后水通道蛋白-1 介导的脑水肿:酸中毒和皮质类固醇给药的影响。
脑临界闭合压:多参数模型是否更适合评估脑血流动力学生理?
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Dec;25(3):446-454. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0288-0.
4
[Critical care management of intracerebral hemorrhage].[脑出血的重症监护管理]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Apr;113(3):164-173. doi: 10.1007/s00063-016-0154-z. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
Early Implementation of THAM for ICP Control: Therapeutic Hypothermia Avoidance and Reduction in Hypertonics/Hyperosmotics.早期应用THAM控制颅内压:避免治疗性低温并减少高渗/高渗性药物的使用。
Case Rep Crit Care. 2014;2014:139342. doi: 10.1155/2014/139342. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
6
Indomethacin for control of ICP.吲哚美辛用于控制颅内压。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Jun;22(3):437-49. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0088-3.
J Neurosurg. 2010 May;112(5):1095-104. doi: 10.3171/2009.8.JNS081704.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
5
Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive.当难以达成共识时,使用GRADE网格来制定临床实践指南决策。
BMJ. 2008 Jul 31;337:a744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a744.
6
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations.将资源使用考量纳入分级建议中。
BMJ. 2008 May 24;336(7654):1170-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80.
7
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.诊断试验和策略的证据质量分级及推荐强度
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1106-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE.
8
Going from evidence to recommendations.从证据到建议。
BMJ. 2008 May 10;336(7652):1049-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE.
9
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?什么是“证据质量”,它对临床医生为何重要?
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE.
10
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.GRADE:关于证据质量评级和推荐强度的新共识。
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.