Suppr超能文献

鼻内翻性乳头状瘤治疗的进展:带蒂内镜手术

Evolution in the treatment of sinonasal inverted papilloma: pedicle-oriented endoscopic surgery.

作者信息

Pagella Fabio, Pusateri Alessandro, Giourgos Georgios, Tinelli Carmine, Matti Elina

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-81. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.3985.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the literature, the global endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) success in the treatment of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is 95%. This study was designed to describe a conservative endoscopic approach, based on research of the tumor's pedicle and treatment concentrated on its site of attachment, and to compare the results of this technique with the outcome of standard endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the patients treated in our institution for paranasal inverted papilloma (IP), between 2002 and 2011 with a minimum of 18 months follow-up was performed. Group A received a standard ESS including whole sinus demucosization (maxillary, ethmoid, frontal, or sphenoid sinus) and bony wall drilling. Group B patients instead underwent pedicle-oriented endoscopic surgery (POES); in this group, bony demucosization and drilling were selectively conducted around the site of pedicle attachment of the tumor.

RESULTS

The cohort included 73 patients (median age, 60.5 years; median follow-up, 58 months). Group A/group B consisted of 37/36 patients. IP persistence-recurrence for group A/group B was 0/1 cases. Oncological success for global endoscopic/group A/group B was 98.6% (72/73)/100% (37/37)/97.2% (35/36). We noticed a significant difference in surgical operative time and postoperative complication rate among the groups, in favor of POES technique.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the efficacy of the endonasal endoscopic treatment for sinonasal IP. Moreover, the even more conservative endoscopic treatment proposed (POES) seems to offer good control of the disease, shorter operating times, avoidance of unnecessary surgery with respect to uninvolved structures, and permits a follow-up aimed at the site of the pedicle attachment.

摘要

背景

文献报道,全球范围内内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)治疗鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤(IP)的成功率为95%。本研究旨在描述一种基于肿瘤蒂部研究并专注于其附着部位治疗的保守性内镜手术方法,并将该技术的结果与标准内镜治疗的结果进行比较。

方法

对2002年至2011年在我院接受治疗的鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤(IP)患者进行回顾性分析,随访时间至少为18个月。A组接受标准的ESS,包括全鼻窦去黏膜(上颌窦、筛窦、额窦或蝶窦)和骨壁钻孔。B组患者则接受以蒂部为导向的内镜手术(POES);在该组中,仅在肿瘤蒂部附着部位周围选择性地进行骨去黏膜和钻孔。

结果

该队列包括73例患者(中位年龄60.5岁;中位随访时间58个月)。A组/B组由37/36例患者组成。A组/B组的IP持续-复发情况分别为0/1例。全球内镜手术/A组/B组的肿瘤学成功率分别为98.6%(72/73)/100%(37/37)/97.2%(35/36)。我们注意到各组之间手术操作时间和术后并发症发生率存在显著差异,POES技术更具优势。

结论

我们的数据证实了鼻内镜治疗鼻窦IP的有效性。此外,所提出的更为保守的内镜治疗方法(POES)似乎能很好地控制疾病,缩短手术时间,避免对未受累结构进行不必要的手术,并允许针对蒂部附着部位进行随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验