Varga-Szemes Akos, Simor Tamas, Lenkey Zsofia, van der Geest Rob J, Kirschner Robert, Toth Levente, Brott Brigitta C, Elgavish Ada, Elgavish Gabriel A
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, MCLM 556, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0005, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;30(5):937-48. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0408-x. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
To study the feasibility of a myocardial infarct (MI) quantification method [signal intensity-based percent infarct mapping (SI-PIM)] that is able to evaluate not only the size, but also the density distribution of the MI. In 14 male swine, MI was generated by 90 min of closed-chest balloon occlusion followed by reperfusion. Seven (n = 7) or 56 (n = 7) days after reperfusion, Gd-DTPA-bolus and continuous-infusion enhanced late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI, and R1-mapping were carried out and post mortem triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride (TTC) staining was performed. MI was quantified using binary [2 or 5 standard deviation (SD)], SI-PIM and R1-PIM methods. Infarct fraction (IF), and infarct-involved voxel fraction (IIVF) were determined by each MRI method. Bias of each method was compared to the TTC technique. The accuracy of MI quantification did not depend on the method of contrast administration or the age of the MI. IFs obtained by either of the two PIM methods were statistically not different from the IFs derived from the TTC measurements at either MI age. IFs obtained from the binary 2SD method overestimated IF obtained from TTC. IIVF among the three different PIM methods did not vary, but with the binary methods the IIVF gradually decreased with increasing the threshold limit. The advantage of SI-PIM over the conventional binary method is the ability to represent not only IF but also the density distribution of the MI. Since the SI-PIM methods are based on a single LGE acquisition, the bolus-data-based SI-PIM method can effortlessly be incorporated into the clinical image post-processing procedure.
为研究一种心肌梗死(MI)定量方法[基于信号强度的梗死百分比映射(SI-PIM)]的可行性,该方法不仅能够评估MI的大小,还能评估其密度分布。在14只雄性猪中,通过90分钟的闭胸球囊闭塞随后再灌注来产生MI。再灌注7天(n = 7)或56天(n = 7)后,进行钆喷酸葡胺(Gd-DTPA)团注和持续输注增强晚期钆增强(LGE)磁共振成像(MRI)以及R1映射,并进行死后氯化三苯基四氮唑(TTC)染色。使用二元[2或5倍标准差(SD)]、SI-PIM和R1-PIM方法对MI进行定量。通过每种MRI方法确定梗死分数(IF)和梗死累及体素分数(IIVF)。将每种方法的偏差与TTC技术进行比较。MI定量的准确性不取决于对比剂给药方法或MI的时间。两种PIM方法中任何一种获得的IF在统计学上与任一MI时间TTC测量得出的IF均无差异。从二元2SD方法获得的IF高估了从TTC获得的IF。三种不同PIM方法之间的IIVF没有变化,但使用二元方法时,IIVF随着阈值上限的增加而逐渐降低。SI-PIM相对于传统二元方法的优势在于不仅能够表示IF,还能表示MI的密度分布。由于SI-PIM方法基于单次LGE采集,基于团注数据的SI-PIM方法可以轻松地纳入临床图像后处理程序。