• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与精神健康研究的服务使用者的活动和意见:英国调查。

Activity and views of service users involved in mental health research: UK survey.

机构信息

Sue Patterson, PhD, Metro North Mental Health - Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Queensland Australia; Jenny Trite, North London Hub, Mental Health Research Network, Central and North West London Foundation Trust, London, UK; Tim Weaver, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;205(1):68-75. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.128637. Epub 2014 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.128637
PMID:24723628
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimisation of the process and outcomes of service user involvement in research is dependent on understanding current practice, challenges and opportunities.

AIMS

To describe activities, roles and experiences of service users involved in mental health research.

METHOD

National cross-sectional online questionnaire survey, using snowball sampling. Descriptive statistics and framework analysis undertaken collaboratively with a service user reference group.

RESULTS

The survey revealed a previously undescribed, highly qualified service user research workforce. Positioned within and alongside mainstream research, respondents reported drawing on extensive service use, and passion for service improvement to challenge perceived clinical academic dominance of research. The support of peers was crucial to involvement, which typically enhanced mental health but for some, pervasive stigma and scrutiny undermined self-confidence and practical difficulties challenged equitable participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of the service user research workforce will support the constructive amalgamation of academic and experiential expertise needed to shape and realise investment in mental health research.

摘要

背景

优化服务用户参与研究的过程和结果取决于对当前实践、挑战和机遇的理解。

目的

描述参与心理健康研究的服务用户的活动、角色和经验。

方法

采用全国性的横断面在线问卷调查,使用雪球抽样。与服务用户参考小组合作进行描述性统计和框架分析。

结果

调查显示了一个以前未被描述的、高度合格的服务用户研究人员队伍。受访者的位置在主流研究的内部和旁边,他们报告利用广泛的服务使用,并对改善服务的热情来挑战对临床学术对研究的主导地位的看法。同伴的支持对参与至关重要,这通常会增强心理健康,但对一些人来说,普遍的污名和审查削弱了自信心,实际困难挑战了公平参与。

结论

承认服务用户研究人员队伍将支持将学术和经验专业知识进行建设性的融合,以塑造和实现对心理健康研究的投资。

相似文献

1
Activity and views of service users involved in mental health research: UK survey.参与精神健康研究的服务使用者的活动和意见:英国调查。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;205(1):68-75. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.128637. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
2
Service user involvement: impact and participation: a survey of service user and staff perspectives.服务使用者参与:影响与参与度:一项关于服务使用者和工作人员观点的调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 25;14:491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0491-7.
3
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Attitudes of mental health professionals towards service user involvement.心理健康专业人员对服务使用者参与的态度。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):681-689. doi: 10.1111/scs.12495. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
User participation in community mental health services: exploring the experiences of users and professionals.用户参与社区心理健康服务:探索用户与专业人员的体验
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00660.x. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
6
Service user involvement in giving mental health students feedback on placement: A participatory action research study.服务使用者参与为心理健康专业学生的实习提供反馈:一项参与式行动研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Sep;35(9):e84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
South African mental health care service user views on priorities for supporting recovery: implications for policy and service development.南非精神卫生保健服务使用者对支持康复重点的看法:对政策和服务发展的启示。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2272-80. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.681005.
8
9
Talking with the experts: evaluation of an online discussion forum involving mental health service users in the education of mental health nursing students.与专家对话:评估一个在线讨论论坛,该论坛涉及心理健康护理专业学生教育中与心理健康服务使用者的交流。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Jul;28(5):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
10
Mental health service users' experiences of mental health care: an integrative literature review.精神卫生服务使用者的精神卫生保健经历:一项综合性文献综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Apr;22(3):171-82. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12202. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.生活经历的重要性:关于患者和公众参与健康研究价值的范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70205. doi: 10.1111/hex.70205.
2
Establishing a peer advisory board in a mental health ethics research group - challenges, benefits, facilitators and lessons learned.在一个心理健康伦理研究小组中建立同行咨询委员会——挑战、益处、促进因素及经验教训。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 28;16:1516996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1516996. eCollection 2025.
3
Transforming Alcohol and Other Drug Education Through Co-Design.
通过共同设计转变酒精及其他药物教育
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e70009. doi: 10.1111/inm.70009.
4
Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.确定患者合作伙伴在研究团队中的角色:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00664-1.
5
What Do We Know About Sharing Power in Co-Production in Mental Health Research? A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.在精神健康研究中的共同生产中分享权力,我们了解多少?系统评价和主题综合。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70014. doi: 10.1111/hex.70014.
6
'Keeping it real': A qualitative exploration of preferences of people with lived experience for participation and active involvement in mental health research in Australia.“保持真实”:澳大利亚有过精神健康问题经历的人对参与和积极投入精神健康研究的偏好的定性探索。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13934. doi: 10.1111/hex.13934.
7
Exploring the perspectives of selectors and collecters of trial outcome data: an international qualitative study.探索试验结局数据选择者和收集者的观点:一项国际定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02054-9.
8
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis.探索参与精神健康和物质使用研究的影响:范围综述和主题分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1806-1819. doi: 10.1111/hex.13779. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
9
User involvement in ageing and health research: a survey of researchers' and older adults' perspectives.用户参与老龄化和健康研究:研究人员和老年人观点的调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 1;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00894-3.
10
Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis.多利益相关者对社区心理健康服务研究中患者和公众参与的观点:定性分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1844-1860. doi: 10.1111/hex.13529. Epub 2022 Jun 3.