Guillén-Riquelme Alejandro, Buela-Casal Gualberto
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014 Jan-Feb;88(1):101-12. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000100007.
Since its creation the STAI has been cited in more than 14,000 documents, with more than 60 adaptations in different countries. In some adaptations this instrument has no clinical scores. The aim of this work is to determine if the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) has higher scores in patients diagnosed with anxiety than in general population. In addition, we want to examine if the internal consistency is adequate in anxious patient samples.
We performed a literature search in Tripdatabase, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, PyscINFO and Scholar Google, for documents published between 2008 y 2012. We selected 131 scientific articles to compare between patients diagnosed with anxiety and general population, and 25 for the generalization of reliability. For the analysis we used Cohen's d for means comparisons (random-effects method) and Cronbach's alpha for the reliability generalization (fixed-effects method).
In the groups comparision the differences in state anxiety (d=1.39; CI95%: 1.22-1.56) and in the trait anxiety (d=1.74; CI95%:1.56-1.91) were significants. The reliability for patients of some anxiety disorder was between 0.87 and 0.93.
So it seems that the STAI is sensitive to the level of anxiety of the individual and reliable for patients with diagnosis of panic attack, specific phobia, social phobia, generalized social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder or acute Stress disorder.
自创建以来,状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)已在超过14000篇文献中被引用,在不同国家有60多种改编版本。在一些改编版本中,该工具没有临床评分。这项研究的目的是确定在被诊断为焦虑症的患者中,状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)的得分是否高于普通人群。此外,我们想检验在焦虑症患者样本中其内部一致性是否足够。
我们在Tripdatabase、Cochrane、Web of Knowledge、Scopus、PyscINFO和谷歌学术中进行文献检索,查找2008年至2012年发表的文献。我们选择了131篇科学文章来比较被诊断为焦虑症的患者和普通人群,以及25篇用于可靠性概括分析。分析时,我们使用Cohen's d进行均值比较(随机效应法),使用Cronbach's alpha进行可靠性概括分析(固定效应法)。
在组间比较中,状态焦虑(d = 1.39;95%置信区间:1.22 - 1.56)和特质焦虑(d = 1.74;95%置信区间:1.56 - 1.91)的差异具有统计学意义。某些焦虑症患者的可靠性在0.87至0.93之间。
因此,状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)似乎对个体的焦虑水平敏感,并且对于诊断为惊恐发作、特定恐惧症、社交恐惧症、广泛性社交恐惧症、广泛性焦虑症、创伤后应激障碍、强迫症或急性应激障碍的患者是可靠的。