• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚临床自恋的大五人格特质分析:从著名人格特质角度理解果敢性

A Big Five facet analysis of sub-clinical narcissism: understanding boldness in terms of well-known personality traits.

作者信息

Furnham Adrian, Crump John

机构信息

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Personal Ment Health. 2014 Aug;8(3):209-17. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1262. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1002/pmh.1262
PMID:24733713
Abstract

This study aimed to examine a Big Five 'bright-side' analysis of a sub-clinical personality disorder, i.e. narcissism. A total of 6957 British adults completed the NEO-PI-R, which measures the Big Five Personality factors at the domain and the facet level, as well as the Hogan Development Survey (HDS), which has a measure of Narcissism called Bold as one of its dysfunctional interpersonal tendencies. Correlation and regression results confirmed many of the associations between the Big Five domains and facets (NEO-PI-R) and sub-clinical narcissism. The Bold (Narcissism) scale from the HDS was the criterion variable in all analyses. Bold individuals are disagreeable extraverts with very low scores on facet Modesty but moderately high scores on Assertiveness, Competence and Achievement Striving. The study confirmed work using different population groups and different measures.

摘要

本研究旨在对一种亚临床人格障碍,即自恋,进行大五人格“积极面”分析。共有6957名英国成年人完成了NEO-PI-R(该量表在领域和层面水平上测量大五人格因素)以及霍根发展调查(HDS),HDS将一种名为“大胆”的自恋测量作为其功能失调的人际倾向之一。相关分析和回归分析结果证实了大五人格领域和层面(NEO-PI-R)与亚临床自恋之间的许多关联。在所有分析中,HDS的“大胆”(自恋)量表均为标准变量。“大胆”的个体是令人讨厌的外向者,在“谦逊”层面得分极低,但在“自信”“能力”和“成就追求”层面得分中等偏高。该研究证实了使用不同人群和不同测量方法所开展的研究成果。

相似文献

1
A Big Five facet analysis of sub-clinical narcissism: understanding boldness in terms of well-known personality traits.亚临床自恋的大五人格特质分析:从著名人格特质角度理解果敢性
Personal Ment Health. 2014 Aug;8(3):209-17. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1262. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
A bright side, facet analysis of histrionic personality disorder: the relationship between the HDS Colourful factor and the NEO-PI-R facets in a large adult sample.表演型人格障碍的积极面、层面分析:在一个大型成年样本中,表演型人格障碍量表色彩因子与大五人格量表层面之间的关系
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov-Dec;154(6):527-36. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.953026.
3
A Big Five facet analysis of a psychopath: The validity of the HDS mischievous scale of sub-clinical psychopathy.对一名精神病态者的大五人格特质分析:亚临床精神病态的HDS恶作剧量表的效度
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Apr;57(2):117-21. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12260. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
4
A Big Five facet analysis of sub-clinical dependent personality disorder (Dutifulness).依赖型人格障碍亚临床症状的大五因素分析(尽责性)。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:622-626. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.052. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
A comparison of Agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy.大五人格量表和 NEO 人格量表的宜人性得分比较:对自恋和精神病态研究的影响。
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):335-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191111411671. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
6
The five-factor narcissism inventory: a five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits.五因素自恋人格量表:一种五因素测量自恋人格特质的工具。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):500-12. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.670680. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Personality correlates of passive-aggressiveness: a NEO-PI-R domain and facet analysis of the HDS Leisurely scale.被动攻击行为的人格相关性:HDS Leisurely 量表的 NEO-PI-R 域和方面分析。
J Ment Health. 2017 Dec;26(6):496-501. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167853. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
A test of the construct validity of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory.五因素自恋人格量表结构效度的检验。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(4):377-87. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.742903. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
A bright side facet analysis of borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍的明侧面分析。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2014 Jun 11;1:7. doi: 10.1186/2051-6673-1-7. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Leadership, Personality, and the Dark Triad in Workplace: A Systematic Review.职场中领导力、个性与黑暗人格三合一之间的关系:一项系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;15(3):297. doi: 10.3390/bs15030297.
2
The Gray Nine and Parallel Personality Patterns: Big Five, Dark Tetrad, and a "Well-Rounded Personality".灰色九型人格与平行人格模式:大五人格、黑暗四人格以及“全面发展的人格”
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1300-1316. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09842-y. Epub 2024 May 4.
3
Effect of Narcissistic Personality on Entrepreneurial Intention Among College Students: Mediation Role of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy.
自恋型人格对大学生创业意向的影响:创业自我效能感的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 7;12:774510. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774510. eCollection 2021.
4
Influence of Traditional Sporting Games on the Development of Creative Skills in Team Sports. The Case of Football.传统体育游戏对团队运动中创造性技能发展的影响。以足球为例。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:611803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611803. eCollection 2020.