Pichler Stefan
ETH Zurich, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, Zurich, Switzerland.
Health Econ. 2015 Jun;24(6):692-710. doi: 10.1002/hec.3054. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
The procyclical nature of sickness absence has been documented by many scholars in literature. So far, explanations have been based on labor force composition and reduced moral hazard caused by fear of job loss during recessions. In this paper, we propose and test a third mechanism caused by reduced moral hazard during booms and infections. We suggest that the workload is higher during economic booms and thus employees have to go to work despite being sick. In a theoretical model focusing on infectious diseases, we show that this will provoke infections of coworkers leading to overall higher sickness absence during economic upturns. Using state-level aggregated data from 112 German public health insurance funds (out of 145 in total), we find that sickness absence due to infectious diseases shows the largest procyclical pattern, as predicted by our theoretical model.
许多学者在文献中记录了病假的顺周期性。到目前为止,解释都是基于劳动力构成以及衰退期间因担心失业而导致的道德风险降低。在本文中,我们提出并检验了由繁荣时期道德风险降低和感染导致的第三种机制。我们认为,经济繁荣时期工作量更大,因此员工即使生病也不得不去上班。在一个关注传染病的理论模型中,我们表明这会引发同事感染,从而导致经济好转期间整体病假率更高。利用来自112个德国公共医疗保险基金(总共145个)的州级汇总数据,我们发现,正如我们的理论模型所预测的,因传染病导致的病假呈现出最大的顺周期模式。