• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在反向相声中是谁在说话?在双重任务表现中区分反应与目标冲突。

Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance.

作者信息

Janczyk Markus, Pfister Roland, Hommel Bernhard, Kunde Wilfried

机构信息

University of Würzburg, Department of Psychology III, Röntgenring 11, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.

University of Würzburg, Department of Psychology III, Röntgenring 11, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Cognition. 2014 Jul;132(1):30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001
PMID:24747873
Abstract

Responses in the second of two subsequently performed tasks can speed up compatible responses in the temporally preceding first task. Such backward crosstalk effects (BCEs) represent a challenge to the assumption of serial processing in stage models of human information processing, because they indicate that certain features of the second response have to be represented before the first response is emitted. Which of these features are actually relevant for BCEs is an open question, even though identifying these features is important for understanding the nature of parallel and serial response selection processes in dual-task performance. Motivated by effect-based models of action control, we show in three experiments that the BCE to a considerable degree reflects features of intended action effects, although features of the response proper (or response-associated kinesthetic feedback) also seem to play a role. These findings suggest that the codes of action effects (or action goals) can become activated simultaneously rather than serially, thereby creating BCEs.

摘要

在随后执行的两项任务中的第二项任务中的反应,可以加快在时间上先于它的第一项任务中的兼容反应。这种反向串扰效应(BCEs)对人类信息处理阶段模型中串行处理的假设提出了挑战,因为它们表明第二项反应的某些特征必须在第一项反应发出之前就被表征出来。尽管确定这些特征对于理解双任务表现中并行和串行反应选择过程的本质很重要,但这些特征中哪些实际上与BCEs相关仍是一个悬而未决的问题。受基于效应的动作控制模型的启发,我们在三个实验中表明,BCE在很大程度上反映了预期动作效应的特征,尽管反应本身的特征(或与反应相关的动觉反馈)似乎也起了作用。这些发现表明,动作效应(或动作目标)的编码可以同时而非串行地被激活,从而产生BCEs。

相似文献

1
Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance.在反向相声中是谁在说话?在双重任务表现中区分反应与目标冲突。
Cognition. 2014 Jul;132(1):30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
2
Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.识别基于兼容性的反向串扰位点:来自扩展PRP范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Feb;44(2):261-276. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000445. Epub 2017 May 29.
3
Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex.双任务中的并行和串行处理分别涉及纹状体和外侧前额叶皮层中的机制。
Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Nov;220(6):3131-42. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0847-0. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
4
Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking.双重任务中反向串扰和任务屏蔽的顺序调制
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 May;42(5):631-47. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000170. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.响应选择瓶颈处的信息连续性:早期并行的任务2响应激活有助于任务2的公开表现。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):934-53. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0457-6.
6
Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.通过最小化任务间串扰来消除双重任务成本:模态和特征配对的作用。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Stimulus-response links and the backward crosstalk effect - A comparison of forced- and free-choice tasks.刺激-反应联系与反向串扰效应——强制选择任务与自由选择任务的比较
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jun;177:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.反向串扰以及任务内部和任务之间维度重叠的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jul;188:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Two types of backward crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model.两种类型的反向串扰:序列调制及扩散模型的证据
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Feb;193:132-152. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.013.
10
Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.扫视与手动反应之间的双任务串扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Apr;35(2):352-62. doi: 10.1037/a0013897.

引用本文的文献

1
Multitasking Practice Eliminates Modality-Based Interference by Separating Task Representations in Sensory Brain Regions.多任务练习通过在感觉脑区分离任务表征来消除基于模态的干扰。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jan 22;45(4):e0755242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0755-24.2024.
2
Dual-task interference: Bottleneck constraint or capacity sharing? Evidence from automatic and controlled processes.双重任务干扰:瓶颈约束还是能力共享?来自自动和控制过程的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):815-827. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02854-1. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
The affective consequences of response inhibition determine no-go-based crosstalk effects in dual tasks.
反应抑制的情感后果决定了双重任务中基于不行走的串扰效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec;77(12):2533-2550. doi: 10.1177/17470218241231681. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks?具身决策偏见:在不同任务中个体稳定存在?
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Apr;241(4):1053-1064. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06591-z. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Opposing influences of global and local stimulus-hand proximity on crosstalk interference in dual tasks.全局刺激与局部刺激手距离对双重任务中串扰干扰的相反影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2461-2478. doi: 10.1177/17470218231157548. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
When more is less: Adding action effects to reduce crosstalk between concurrently performed tasks.事与愿违:添加动作效果以减少同时执行任务之间的串扰。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105318. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105318. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
Embodied decisions during walking.行走时的具身决策。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Nov 1;128(5):1207-1223. doi: 10.1152/jn.00149.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
8
Post-execution monitoring in dishonesty.欺骗行为的事后监测。
Psychol Res. 2023 Apr;87(3):845-861. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01691-x. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
9
Similar proactive effect monitoring in free and forced choice action modes.自由选择和强制选择动作模式下相似的主动效应监测。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):226-241. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01644-4. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
Crosstalk, not resource competition, as a source of dual-task costs: Evidence from manipulating stimulus-action effect conceptual compatibility.言语干扰而非资源竞争是双任务代价的来源:来自于操纵刺激-动作效应概念兼容性的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1224-1232. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01903-2. Epub 2021 Mar 10.