• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于早期反应的受试者工作特征曲线分析识别的用于预测重度抑郁症患者帕罗西汀疗效的性别差异。

Sex differences in the prediction of the effectiveness of paroxetine for patients with major depressive disorder identified using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for early response.

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Apr 8;10:599-606. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S57189. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S57189
PMID:24748795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3986275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated cutoff values for the early response of patients with major depressive disorder to paroxetine and their sex differences by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to predict the effectiveness of paroxetine.

METHODS

In total, 120 patients with major depressive disorder were enrolled and treated with 10-40 mg/day paroxetine for 6 weeks; 89 patients completed the protocol. A clinical evaluation using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was performed at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6.

RESULTS

In male subjects, the cutoff values for MADRS improvement rating in week 1, week 2, and week 4 were 20.9%, 34.9%, and 33.3%, respectively. The sensitivities and the specificities were 83.3% and 80.0%, 83.3% and 80.0%, and 100% and 90%, respectively. The areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.908, 0.821, and 0.979, respectively. In female subjects, the cutoff values for the MADRS improvement rating in week 1, week 2, and week 4 were 21.4%, 35.7%, and 32.3%, respectively. The sensitivities and the specificities were 71.4% and 84.6%, 73.8% and 76.9%, and 90.5% and 76.9%, respectively. The AUCs were 0.781, 0.735, and 0.904, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early improvement with paroxetine may predict the long-term response. The accuracy of the prediction for the response is higher in male subjects.

摘要

背景

我们通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,探讨了帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症患者早期应答的截断值及其性别差异,以预测帕罗西汀的疗效。

方法

共纳入 120 例重度抑郁症患者,给予帕罗西汀 10-40mg/d 治疗 6 周;89 例完成方案。在 0、1、2、4 和 6 周时采用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)进行临床评估。

结果

在男性患者中,第 1、2 和 4 周时 MADRS 改善评分的截断值分别为 20.9%、34.9%和 33.3%。敏感度和特异度分别为 83.3%和 80.0%、83.3%和 80.0%、100%和 90%。曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.908、0.821 和 0.979。在女性患者中,第 1、2 和 4 周时 MADRS 改善评分的截断值分别为 21.4%、35.7%和 32.3%。敏感度和特异度分别为 71.4%和 84.6%、73.8%和 76.9%、90.5%和 76.9%。AUC 分别为 0.781、0.735 和 0.904。

结论

帕罗西汀早期改善可能预测长期反应。男性患者预测反应的准确性更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04d/3986275/f9de742b9f49/ndt-10-599Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04d/3986275/4fea4546bef0/ndt-10-599Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04d/3986275/b047456c8ebf/ndt-10-599Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04d/3986275/f9de742b9f49/ndt-10-599Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04d/3986275/4fea4546bef0/ndt-10-599Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04d/3986275/b047456c8ebf/ndt-10-599Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04d/3986275/f9de742b9f49/ndt-10-599Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex differences in the prediction of the effectiveness of paroxetine for patients with major depressive disorder identified using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for early response.基于早期反应的受试者工作特征曲线分析识别的用于预测重度抑郁症患者帕罗西汀疗效的性别差异。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Apr 8;10:599-606. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S57189. eCollection 2014.
2
Effects of age on paroxetine efficacy in patients with major depressive disorder who do not exhibit an early response to treatment.年龄对未表现出早期治疗反应的重度抑郁症患者帕罗西汀疗效的影响。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015 Jan-Feb;38(1):6-10. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000058.
3
Items of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Associated With Response to Paroxetine Treatment in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.蒙哥马利-Åsberg抑郁评定量表中与重度抑郁症患者帕罗西汀治疗反应相关的条目。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2016 May-Jun;39(3):135-9. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000146.
4
An attempt to construct a 7-item short version of the temperament and character inventory to predict the treatment response of patients with depression; a validation study.构建一个7项简短版气质与性格量表以预测抑郁症患者治疗反应的尝试;一项验证性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 12;16:290. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0997-0.
5
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
6
A comparative study of the efficacy of long-term treatment with escitalopram and paroxetine in severely depressed patients.艾司西酞普兰与帕罗西汀对重度抑郁症患者长期治疗效果的比较研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1331-41. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115513.
7
Therapeutic reference range for plasma concentrations of paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorders.重度抑郁症患者血浆中帕罗西汀浓度的治疗参考范围。
Ther Drug Monit. 2014 Aug;36(4):480-5. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000036.
8
Is there a definition of remission in late-life depression that predicts later relapse?是否存在一种能预测晚年抑郁症后期复发的缓解定义?
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Dec;29(12):2272-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300549.
9
The self-reported Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale is a useful evaluative tool in Major Depressive Disorder.自我报告的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表是重度抑郁症中一种有用的评估工具。
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 May 27;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-26.
10
An investigation of temperament and character inventory items for predicting the response to paroxetine treatment in patients with major depressive disorder.一项关于用于预测重度抑郁症患者对帕罗西汀治疗反应的气质与性格量表项目的调查。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Aug;165:109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.076. Epub 2014 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Does early improvement in depressive symptoms predict subsequent remission in patients with depression who are treated with duloxetine?对于接受度洛西汀治疗的抑郁症患者,抑郁症状的早期改善是否能预测其随后的缓解?
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 May 23;12:1269-73. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S103432. eCollection 2016.
2
The association between the subjective memory complaints scale and depressive state and cognitive impairment: a factor analysis.主观记忆主诉量表与抑郁状态及认知障碍之间的关联:一项因素分析
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Nov 23;11:2935-41. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S93539. eCollection 2015.
3
Prediction of treatment outcomes in psychiatry--where do we stand ?

本文引用的文献

1
Electrocortical features of depression and their clinical utility in assessing antidepressant treatment outcome.抑郁的脑电特征及其在评估抗抑郁治疗效果中的临床应用。
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;58(9):509-14. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800905.
2
Auditory P3 in antidepressant pharmacotherapy treatment responders, non-responders and controls.抗抑郁药治疗反应者、无反应者和对照组的听觉 P3。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;23(11):1561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 9.
3
The distance between Mars and Venus: measuring global sex differences in personality.
精神病学治疗结果的预测——我们目前的状况如何?
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014 Dec;16(4):455-64. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.4/fmcmahon.
火星与金星之间的距离:测量人格的全球性别差异。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029265. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
4
Is switching antidepressants following early nonresponse more beneficial in acute-phase treatment of depression?: a randomized open-label trial.早期无应答后转换抗抑郁药在抑郁症急性期治疗中是否更有益?一项随机开放标签试验。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Dec 1;35(8):1983-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
5
Early prediction of fluoxetine response for Han Chinese inpatients with major depressive disorder.早期预测汉族抑郁症住院患者对氟西汀的反应。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Apr;31(2):187-93. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318210856f.
6
Identifying depressive subtypes in a large cohort study: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).在一项大型队列研究中识别抑郁亚型:来自荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;71(12):1582-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05398blu. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
7
Midline and right frontal brain function as a physiologic biomarker of remission in major depression.中线和右侧额叶脑区功能作为重度抑郁症缓解的生理生物标志物。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Nov 30;174(2):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
8
Differential clinical effects of fluvoxamine by the effect of age in Japanese female major depressive patients.氟伏沙明对日本女性重性抑郁患者年龄影响的临床疗效差异。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:151-5. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s4918. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
9
Mirtazapine and paroxetine in major depression: a comparison of monotherapy versus their combination from treatment initiation.米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症:从治疗开始时单药治疗与联合治疗的比较
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jul;19(7):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.01.015. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
10
Early response as predictor of final remission in elderly depressed patients.老年抑郁患者早期反应预测最终缓解。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;24(11):1299-303. doi: 10.1002/gps.2261.