• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在开腹手术、腹腔镜手术或机器人手术中,医疗消费者更喜欢哪种胰腺手术方法?一项调查。

Which method of pancreatic surgery do medical consumers prefer among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery? A survey.

作者信息

Kwon Wooil, Jang Jin-Young, Park Jae Woo, Han In Woong, Kang Mee Joo, Kim Sun-Whe

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Jan;86(1):7-15. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.1.7. Epub 2014 Jan 1.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2014.86.1.7
PMID:24761401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3994613/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The consumers' preferences are not considered in developing or implementing new medical technologies. Furthermore, little efforts are made to investigate their demands. Therefore, their preferred surgical method and the factors affecting that preference were investigated in pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Six-hundred subjects including 100 medical personnel (MP) and 500 lay persons (LP) were surveyed. Questionnaire included basic information on different methods of distal pancreatectomy; open surgery (OS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and robotic surgery (RS). Assuming they required the operation, participants were told to indicate their preferred method along with a reason and an acceptable cost for both benign and malignant conditions.

RESULTS

For benign disease, the most preferred method was LS. Limiting the choice to LS and RS, LS was preferred for cost and well-established safety and efficacy. OS was favored in malignant disease for the concern for radicality. Limiting the choice to LS and RS, LS was favored for its better-established safety and efficacy. The majority thought that LS and RS were both overpriced. Comparing MP and LP responses, both groups preferred LS in benign and OS in malignant conditions. However, LP more than MP tended to prefer RS under both benign and malignant conditions. LP thought that LS was expensive whereas MP thought the cost reasonable. Both groups felt that RS was too expensive.

CONCLUSION

Though efforts for development of novel techniques and broadening indication should be encouraged, still more investments and research should focus on LS and OS to provide optimal management and satisfaction to the patients.

摘要

目的

在开发或实施新的医疗技术时未考虑消费者的偏好。此外,很少有人努力去调查他们的需求。因此,我们对胰腺手术中患者偏好的手术方法及其影响因素进行了调查。

方法

对600名受试者进行了调查,其中包括100名医务人员(MP)和500名非专业人员(LP)。问卷包括关于不同远端胰腺切除术方法的基本信息;开放手术(OS)、腹腔镜手术(LS)和机器人手术(RS)。假设他们需要进行手术,要求参与者指出他们偏好的方法,并说明理由以及良性和恶性疾病情况下可接受的费用。

结果

对于良性疾病,最受欢迎的方法是LS。若选择仅限于LS和RS,由于成本以及已确立的安全性和有效性,LS更受青睐。在恶性疾病中,由于对根治性的关注,OS更受青睐。若选择仅限于LS和RS,由于其更好确立的安全性和有效性,LS更受青睐。大多数人认为LS和RS都定价过高。比较MP和LP的回答,两组在良性疾病中都更喜欢LS,在恶性疾病中都更喜欢OS。然而,在良性和恶性疾病情况下,LP比MP更倾向于选择RS。LP认为LS昂贵,而MP认为成本合理。两组都觉得RS太贵。

结论

虽然应鼓励开发新技术和扩大适应症的努力,但仍应更多地投资和研究集中在LS和OS上,以便为患者提供最佳的治疗和满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/79cbad498919/astr-86-7-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/7aa99e0978e9/astr-86-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/cb05b608e8e9/astr-86-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/12caa8b5b9f5/astr-86-7-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/79cbad498919/astr-86-7-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/7aa99e0978e9/astr-86-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/cb05b608e8e9/astr-86-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/12caa8b5b9f5/astr-86-7-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4daa/3994613/79cbad498919/astr-86-7-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Which method of pancreatic surgery do medical consumers prefer among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery? A survey.在开腹手术、腹腔镜手术或机器人手术中,医疗消费者更喜欢哪种胰腺手术方法?一项调查。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Jan;86(1):7-15. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.1.7. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
2
Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study.直肠癌的开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术:一项多中心研究的中期比较结果
Tumori. 2016 Aug 3;102(4):414-21. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000533. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
3
A Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Right-sided Colon Cancer.开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗右半结肠癌的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Dec;26(6):497-502. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000331.
4
The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.机器人手术治疗中低位直肠癌的影响:三臂对比——开放、腹腔镜和机器人手术的病例匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):95-101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182686bbd.
5
Initial experience with laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the treatment of periampullary tumours: single institution experience with the first 30 consecutive cases.腹腔镜和机器人手术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤的初步经验:单机构连续30例的经验
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):E137-E141. doi: 10.1111/ans.15033. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.肥胖子宫内膜癌患者的机器人手术、腹腔镜手术与开放手术——总费用和并发症发生率的比较分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
7
A comparison of robotic-assisted splenectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy for children with hematologic disorders.机器人辅助脾切除术与腹腔镜脾切除术治疗儿童血液系统疾病的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 May;56(5):1047-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
8
Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery.结直肠切除术后的手术应激反应:机器人手术、腹腔镜手术和开放手术的比较
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 May;19(5):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1263-4. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
9
Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Elderly Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.老年子宫内膜癌患者腹腔镜手术与机器人手术的比较:一项回顾性多中心研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 22;11:724886. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.724886. eCollection 2021.
10
A comparison of open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients.开放手术、机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗极度肥胖子宫内膜癌患者的比较。
JSLS. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):e2014.00001. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: first Polish experience.机器人手术在子宫内膜癌中的应用:波兰的初步经验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 12;18(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01752-2.
2
Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy-feasibility study of a modified 'artery first' approach to pancreatic head cancer.腹腔镜下钩突先行胰十二指肠切除术——胰头癌改良“动脉先行”入路的可行性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):917-923. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1597-2. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
3
[Robot-assisted surgery - Progress or expensive toy? : Matched-pair comparative analysis of robot-assisted cholecystectomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review on the surgical treatment for T1 gallbladder cancer.关于 T1 期胆囊癌的外科治疗的系统评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan 14;17(2):174-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i2.174.
2
Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?传统腹腔镜与达芬奇机器人辅助保留脾脏的胰切除术:达芬奇机器人有临床优势吗?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):2004-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1504-1. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
3
New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.
[机器人辅助手术——是进步还是昂贵的玩具?:机器人辅助胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的配对比较分析]
Chirurg. 2017 Dec;88(12):1040-1045. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0466-4.
4
[Robotics in the operating room : Out of the niche into widespread application].[手术室中的机器人技术:从小众领域走向广泛应用]
Chirurg. 2016 Dec;87(12):1025-1032. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0313-z.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy - The first meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术——首例荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jul;18(7):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 20.
6
Minimally invasive surgical approach to pancreatic malignancies.胰腺癌的微创外科手术方法。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Dec 15;7(12):411-21. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i12.411.
新技术与医疗保健成本——机器人辅助手术的案例
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):701-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006602.
4
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011 Mar;18(2):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s00534-010-0325-x.
5
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜胰腺手术:单外科医生经验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1646-57. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0825-4. Epub 2010 Jan 9.
6
Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach.左侧胰腺导管腺癌切除术十年经验:从传统开腹手术到腹腔镜手术的演变及初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1533-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0806-7. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
7
Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术技术的演变:来自一家三级中心的十年经验
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(6):731-40. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0157-8. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
8
Natural orifice versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a porcine model: a randomized, controlled trial.猪模型中自然腔道与传统腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.021. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
9
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
10
Laparoscopic liver surgery for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者的腹腔镜肝脏手术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):800-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9749-1. Epub 2007 Dec 29.