Landau Michael S, Hastings Steven M, Foxwell Tyler J, Luketich James D, Nason Katie S, Davison Jon M
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2014 Dec;27(12):1578-89. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.66. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
The treatment approach for superficial (stage T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma critically depends on the pre-operative assessment of metastatic risk. Part of that assessment involves evaluation of the primary tumor for pathologic characteristics known to predict nodal metastasis: depth of invasion (intramucosal vs submucosal), angiolymphatic invasion, tumor grade, and tumor size. Tumor budding is a histologic pattern that is associated with poor prognosis in early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma and a predictor of nodal metastasis in T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma. In a retrospective study, we used a semi-quantitative histologic scoring system to categorize 210 surgically resected, superficial (stage T1) esophageal adenocarcinomas according to the extent of tumor budding (none, focal, and extensive) and also evaluated other known risk factors for nodal metastasis, including depth of invasion, angiolymphatic invasion, tumor grade, and tumor size. We assessed the risk of nodal metastasis associated with tumor budding in univariate analyses and controlled for other risk factors in a multivariate logistic regression model. In all, 41% (24 out of 59) of tumors with extensive tumor budding (tumor budding in ≥3 20X microscopic fields) were metastatic to regional lymph nodes, compared with 10% (12 out of 117) of tumors with no tumor budding, and 15% (5 out of 34) of tumors with focal tumor budding (P<0.001). When controlling for all pathologic risk factors in a multivariate analysis, extensive tumor budding remains an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with a 2.5-fold increase (95% CI=1.1-6.3, P=0.039) in the risk of nodal metastasis. Extensive tumor budding is also a poor prognostic factor with respect to overall survival and time to recurrence in univariate and multivariate analyses. As an independent risk factor for nodal metastasis and poor prognosis after esophagectomy, tumor budding should be evaluated in superficial (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma as a part of a comprehensive pathologic risk assessment.
浅表性(T1期)食管腺癌的治疗方法严重依赖于术前对转移风险的评估。该评估的一部分包括评估原发性肿瘤的病理特征,这些特征已知可预测淋巴结转移:浸润深度(黏膜内 vs 黏膜下)、血管淋巴管浸润、肿瘤分级和肿瘤大小。肿瘤芽生是一种组织学模式,与早期结直肠癌的预后不良相关,并且是T1期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的预测指标。在一项回顾性研究中,我们使用半定量组织学评分系统,根据肿瘤芽生的程度(无、局灶性和广泛性)对210例手术切除的浅表性(T1期)食管腺癌进行分类,并评估其他已知的淋巴结转移风险因素,包括浸润深度、血管淋巴管浸润、肿瘤分级和肿瘤大小。我们在单因素分析中评估了与肿瘤芽生相关的淋巴结转移风险,并在多因素逻辑回归模型中对其他风险因素进行了控制。总体而言,广泛性肿瘤芽生(在≥3个20倍显微镜视野中有肿瘤芽生)肿瘤中有41%(59例中的24例)发生区域淋巴结转移,相比之下,无肿瘤芽生的肿瘤为10%(117例中的12例),局灶性肿瘤芽生的肿瘤为15%(34例中的5例)(P<0.001)。在多因素分析中控制所有病理风险因素后,广泛性肿瘤芽生仍然是浅表性食管腺癌淋巴结转移的独立风险因素,淋巴结转移风险增加2.5倍(95%CI=1.1-6.3,P=0.039)。在单因素和多因素分析中,广泛性肿瘤芽生也是总体生存和复发时间方面的不良预后因素。作为食管切除术后淋巴结转移和预后不良的独立风险因素,肿瘤芽生应作为综合病理风险评估的一部分,在浅表性(T1期)食管腺癌中进行评估。