• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭开孤儿药定价黑箱的面纱。

Shining a light in the black box of orphan drug pricing.

作者信息

Picavet Eline, Morel Thomas, Cassiman David, Simoens Steven

机构信息

KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Herestraat 49, PO box 521, Leuven 3000, Belgium.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Apr 27;9:62. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-9-62.

DOI:10.1186/1750-1172-9-62
PMID:24767472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4018963/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pricing mechanism of orphan drugs appears arbitrary and has been referred to as a "black box". Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate how drug- and disease-specific variables relate to orphan drug prices. Additionally, we aim to explore if certain country-specific pricing and reimbursement policies affect the price level of orphan drugs.

METHODS

Annual treatment costs per indication per patient were calculated for 59 orphan drugs with a publicly available price in Belgium, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, France, Italy and the United Kingdom. A multiple linear regression model was built with 14 drug- and disease-specific variables. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to explore whether there is a correlation between annual treatment costs of orphan drugs across countries with different pricing and reimbursement policies.

RESULTS

Repurposed orphan drugs, orally administered orphan drugs or orphan drugs for which an alternative treatment is available are associated with lower annual treatment costs. Orphan drugs with multiple orphan indications, for chronic treatments or for which an improvement in overall survival or quality-of-life has been demonstrated, are associated with higher annual treatment costs. No association was found between annual treatments cost of orphan drugs across countries and the different pricing and reimbursement systems.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that prices of orphan drugs are influenced by factors such as the availability of an alternative drug treatment, repurposing, etc. Current debate about the affordability of orphan drugs highlights the need for more transparency in orphan drug price setting.

摘要

背景

罕见病药物的定价机制似乎具有随意性,被称为“黑匣子”。因此,本研究的目的是调查药物和疾病特定变量与罕见病药物价格之间的关系。此外,我们旨在探讨某些特定国家的定价和报销政策是否会影响罕见病药物的价格水平。

方法

计算了比利时、荷兰、捷克共和国、法国、意大利和英国59种有公开价格的罕见病药物每种适应症每位患者的年度治疗成本。构建了一个包含14个药物和疾病特定变量的多元线性回归模型。使用曼-惠特尼U检验来探讨不同定价和报销政策国家的罕见病药物年度治疗成本之间是否存在相关性。

结果

重新利用的罕见病药物、口服给药的罕见病药物或有替代治疗方法的罕见病药物,其年度治疗成本较低。具有多种罕见病适应症、用于慢性治疗或已证明可提高总体生存率或生活质量的罕见病药物,其年度治疗成本较高。未发现不同国家的罕见病药物年度治疗成本与不同的定价和报销系统之间存在关联。

结论

本研究表明,罕见病药物价格受替代药物治疗的可用性、重新利用等因素影响。当前关于罕见病药物可负担性的争论凸显了在罕见病药物定价方面提高透明度的必要性。

相似文献

1
Shining a light in the black box of orphan drug pricing.揭开孤儿药定价黑箱的面纱。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Apr 27;9:62. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-9-62.
2
Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency.孤儿药的定价和报销:需要提高透明度。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Jun 17;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-42.
3
Determinants of orphan drugs prices in France: a regression analysis.法国孤儿药价格的决定因素:一项回归分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Apr 21;12(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0561-5.
4
Analysing criteria for price and reimbursement of orphan drugs in Spain.西班牙罕见病药物的定价与报销分析标准
Farm Hosp. 2019 Jul 1;43(4):121-127. doi: 10.7399/fh.11147.
5
Global spending on orphan drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007.2007 年法国、德国、英国、意大利和西班牙的孤儿药全球支出情况。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(5):301-15. doi: 10.2165/11531880-000000000-00000.
6
Policies and availability of orphan medicines in outpatient care in 24 European countries.24个欧洲国家门诊护理中孤儿药的政策与可及性
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;74(7):895-902. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2457-x. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
7
Affordability Challenges to Value-Based Pricing: Mass Diseases, Orphan Diseases, and Cures.基于价值定价的可负担性挑战:大规模疾病、罕见病与治愈方法
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.018.
8
Availability of and access to orphan drugs: an international comparison of pharmaceutical treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, hereditary angioedema and chronic myeloid leukaemia.孤儿药的可及性和可获得性:肺动脉高压、法布雷病、遗传性血管性水肿和慢性髓性白血病的药物治疗的国际比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jan;29(1):63-82. doi: 10.2165/11539190-000000000-00000.
9
Variables affecting pricing of orphan drugs: the Italian case.影响孤儿药定价的因素:意大利案例。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Oct 19;16(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-02022-w.
10
The actual status of drug prices and adjustment factors for drug price calculation: an analysis of ultra-orphan drug development in Japan.药品价格的实际状况及药品价格计算的调整因素:日本超罕用药开发分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Nov 8;17(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02526-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of four pricing models for orphan medicines: a case study for lumasiran.四种罕见病药物定价模型的应用:鲁马西拉案例研究
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Dec 23;19(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03446-w.
2
Comparative policy analysis of national rare disease funding policies in Australia, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States: a scoping review.澳大利亚、新加坡、韩国、英国和美国国家罕见病资助政策的比较政策分析:一项范围综述
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00519-1.
3
A multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) applied to three long-term prophylactic treatments for hereditary angioedema in Spain.一项多标准决策分析(MCDA)应用于西班牙遗传性血管性水肿的三种长期预防性治疗。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan 25;9:14-21. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2022.2333. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Capture and passive predation in times of COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情时期的捕获与被动捕食
Public Choice. 2022;193(3-4):163-186. doi: 10.1007/s11127-022-01005-0. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
5
How Can We Optimize the Value Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs for Reimbursement Purposes? A Qualitative Interview Study Across European Countries.我们如何优化用于报销目的的罕见病药物价值评估和评价?一项对欧洲国家的定性访谈研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 19;13:902150. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.902150. eCollection 2022.
6
Economic burden and health related quality of life of ultra-rare Gaucher disease in China.中国超罕见戈谢病的经济负担和健康相关生活质量。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Aug 11;16(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01963-6.
7
How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.如何评估罕见病药物的价值?欧洲价值评估框架综述。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 12;12:631527. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.631527. eCollection 2021.
8
Evaluation of orphan diseases global burden.罕见病全球负担评估。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2021 May 14;31(2):9610. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2021.9610.
9
Pricing and Reimbursement Pathways of New Orphan Drugs in South Korea: A Longitudinal Comparison.韩国新型孤儿药的定价与报销途径:纵向比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;9(3):296. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030296.
10
Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature.孤儿药的公共支出:文献综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Oct 13;13:66. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00260-0. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries.协调成本和结果的不确定性与获得孤儿药需求之间的关系:对七个欧洲国家管理准入协议的比较研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013 Dec 24;8:198. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-198.
2
A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines.多准则决策分析在评估孤儿药价值中的初步研究。
Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
3
Differential pricing of new pharmaceuticals in lower income European countries.欧洲低收入国家新药品的差异化定价。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec;13(6):735-41. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.847367.
4
Sustainable rare diseases business and drug access: no time for misconceptions.可持续的罕见病业务与药物可及性:不容误解。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013 Jul 23;8:109. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-109.
5
Reforming the payment system for medical oncology.改革肿瘤医学支付体系。
JAMA. 2013 Jul 17;310(3):261-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8127.
6
Beware the increasing cost and number of orphan drugs.谨防孤儿药成本不断上升且数量不断增加的情况。
Manag Care. 2013 Mar;22(3):10-4.
7
What is wrong with orphan drug policies?孤儿药政策有何问题?
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.004.
8
What is wrong with orphan drug policies? Suggestions for ways forward.孤儿药政策有何问题?前进方向的建议。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1182-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2202. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
9
Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments?支付孤儿药系统费用:是坚持还是妥协?是否到了欧洲的支付方采用新的评估体系来考虑新的罕见病治疗方法的时候了?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Sep 26;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-74.
10
Societal views on NICE, cancer drugs fund and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great Britain.英国成年人对 NICE、癌症药物基金以及基于价值的药物优先排序定价标准的看法:一项对 4118 名成年人的横断面调查。
Health Econ. 2013 Aug;22(8):948-64. doi: 10.1002/hec.2872. Epub 2012 Sep 7.