Suppr超能文献

机械主动脉根部置换术后的寿命——男性活得更长吗?

Longevity after mechanical aortic root replacement--do men live longer?

作者信息

Girrbach Felix, Etz Christian D, Dohmen Pascal M, von Aspern Konstantin, Luehr Maximilian, Borger Michael A, Misfeld Martin, Eifert Sandra, Mohr Friedrich-Wilhelm

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):2087-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.042. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether longevity after mechanical aortic root replacement is influenced by the patient's gender.

METHODS

From February 1998 to June 2011, 476 patients (376 men, 100 women, mean age, 53±12 years; range, 18-88) underwent composite aortic root replacement. Of these patients, 398 (312 men) were included in the present analysis. The indications for root replacement were aortic valve dysfunction (mostly stenosis) and concomitant aneurysmal disease in 334 (83.9%), acute type A aortic dissection in 51 (12.8%), and infective endocarditis in 10 (2.5%). Other indications were technical or anatomic considerations (0.8%).

RESULTS

The women who presented for surgery were significantly older (men, 52±12 years vs women, 56±12 years; P=.01). However, no significant differences were found with regard to previous cardiac surgery (5.3%, 20 men [6.4%] vs 1 woman [1.2%]; P=.06), concomitant procedures (38%; 117 men [37.5%] vs 35 women [40.7%]; P=.62), or additive EuroSCORE (men, 5.1±2.2; women, 5.2±2.2; P=.55). The mean diameter of the ascending aorta was not significantly different between the 2 groups (men, 54±9 mm; women, 56±14 mm; P=.97). The median follow-up period was 7.4 years (range, 0-13; 2366 cumulative patient-years), with no significant difference in hospital mortality (men, 6.7% vs women, 10.5%; P=.25). Overall, men enjoyed significantly better longevity than did women. After 10 years, 73%±3% of the men and only 60%±6% of the women were alive (P=.03). Although no long-term survival benefit for either gender was found in an age-matched subgroup among young patients (P=.66), men experienced much more favorable longevity after 55 years of age (P=.04). Consequently, the longevity in men-but not in women-was equal to an age-matched normal population.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, long-term survival after mechanical aortic root replacement was significantly better among men. However, comparing age-matched subgroups≤55 years old, no significantly different life expectancy was found after mechanical root replacement.

摘要

目的

探讨机械主动脉根部置换术后的长期生存率是否受患者性别的影响。

方法

1998年2月至2011年6月,476例患者(376例男性,100例女性,平均年龄53±12岁;范围18 - 88岁)接受了主动脉根部复合置换术。其中,398例(312例男性)纳入本分析。根部置换的适应证包括主动脉瓣功能障碍(主要为狭窄)合并动脉瘤性疾病334例(83.9%)、急性A型主动脉夹层51例(12.8%)、感染性心内膜炎10例(2.5%)。其他适应证为技术或解剖学因素(0.8%)。

结果

接受手术的女性年龄显著更大(男性52±12岁 vs 女性56±12岁;P = 0.01)。然而,在既往心脏手术方面未发现显著差异(5.3%,20例男性[6.4%] vs 1例女性[1.2%];P = 0.06),在同期手术方面也无显著差异(38%;117例男性[37.5%] vs 35例女性[40.7%];P = 0.62),或在欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)相加值方面同样无显著差异(男性5.1±2.2;女性5.2±2.2;P = 0.55)。升主动脉的平均直径在两组之间无显著差异(男性54±9 mm;女性56±14 mm;P = 0.97)。中位随访期为7.4年(范围0 - 13年;累积患者年数2366),住院死亡率无显著差异(男性6.7% vs 女性10.5%;P = 0.25)。总体而言,男性的长期生存率显著优于女性。10年后,73%±3%的男性存活,而女性仅为60%±6%(P = 0.03)。尽管在年轻患者的年龄匹配亚组中未发现任何性别有长期生存获益(P = 0.66),但55岁以后男性的长期生存率更优(P = 0.04)。因此,男性而非女性的长期生存率与年龄匹配的正常人群相当。

结论

总体而言,机械主动脉根部置换术后男性的长期生存率显著更好。然而,比较年龄匹配的≤55岁亚组,机械根部置换术后预期寿命无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验