Buxbaum Laurel J, Shapiro Allison D, Coslett H Branch
1 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 50 Township Line Rd, Elkins Park, PA, 19027, USA
1 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 50 Township Line Rd, Elkins Park, PA, 19027, USA.
Brain. 2014 Jul;137(Pt 7):1971-85. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu111. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
Numerous functional neuroimaging studies suggest that widespread bilateral parietal, temporal, and frontal regions are involved in tool-related and pantomimed gesture performance, but the role of these regions in specific aspects of gestural tasks remains unclear. In the largest prospective study of apraxia-related lesions to date, we performed voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping with data from 71 left hemisphere stroke participants to assess the critical neural substrates of three types of actions: gestures produced in response to viewed tools, imitation of tool-specific gestures demonstrated by the examiner, and imitation of meaningless gestures. Thus, two of the three gesture types were tool-related, and two of the three were imitative, enabling pairwise comparisons designed to highlight commonalities and differences. Gestures were scored separately for postural (hand/arm positioning) and kinematic (amplitude/timing) accuracy. Lesioned voxels in the left posterior temporal gyrus were significantly associated with lower scores on the posture component for both of the tool-related gesture tasks. Poor performance on the kinematic component of all three gesture tasks was significantly associated with lesions in left inferior parietal and frontal regions. These data enable us to propose a componential neuroanatomic model of action that delineates the specific components required for different gestural action tasks. Thus, visual posture information and kinematic capacities are differentially critical to the three types of actions studied here: the kinematic aspect is particularly critical for imitation of meaningless movement, capacity for tool-action posture representations are particularly necessary for pantomimed gestures to the sight of tools, and both capacities inform imitation of tool-related movements. These distinctions enable us to advance traditional accounts of apraxia.
众多功能性神经影像学研究表明,广泛的双侧顶叶、颞叶和额叶区域参与了与工具相关的和模仿性手势的执行,但这些区域在手势任务特定方面的作用仍不清楚。在迄今为止最大规模的与失用症相关病变的前瞻性研究中,我们对71名左半球中风参与者的数据进行了基于体素的病变-症状映射,以评估三种动作类型的关键神经基质:对看到的工具做出反应而产生的手势、模仿检查者展示的特定工具手势以及模仿无意义手势。因此,三种手势类型中有两种与工具相关,三种中有两种是模仿性的,这使得能够进行成对比较以突出共性和差异。对手势的姿势(手/手臂定位)和运动学(幅度/时间)准确性分别进行评分。左侧颞下回的病变体素与两个与工具相关的手势任务的姿势成分得分较低显著相关。所有三种手势任务的运动学成分表现不佳与左侧顶叶下部和额叶区域的病变显著相关。这些数据使我们能够提出一个动作成分神经解剖模型,该模型描绘了不同手势动作任务所需的特定成分。因此,视觉姿势信息和运动学能力对这里研究的三种动作类型具有不同的关键作用:运动学方面对于无意义动作的模仿尤为关键,工具动作姿势表征能力对于看到工具时的模仿性手势尤为必要,并且这两种能力都影响对与工具相关动作的模仿。这些区别使我们能够推进对失用症的传统解释。