Suppr超能文献

老年人和年轻人中的吸引力光环效应与娃娃脸刻板印象:相似性、自身年龄强化及老年人积极效应

The attractiveness halo effect and the babyface stereotype in older and younger adults: similarities, own-age accentuation, and older adult positivity effects.

作者信息

Zebrowitz Leslie A, Franklin Robert G

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Brandeis University , Waltham , Massachusetts , USA.

出版信息

Exp Aging Res. 2014;40(3):375-93. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.897151.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Two well-documented phenomena in person perception are the attractiveness halo effect (more positive impressions of more attractive people), and the babyface stereotype (more childlike impressions of more babyfaced people), shown by children, young adults (YA), and people from diverse cultures. This is the first study to systematically investigate these face stereotypes in older adults (OA) and to compare effects for younger and older adult faces.

METHODS

YA and OA judges rated competence, health, hostility, untrustworthiness, attractiveness, and babyfaceness of older and younger neutral expression faces. Multilevel modeling assessed effects of rater age and face age on appearance stereotypes.

RESULTS

Like YA, OA showed both the attractiveness halo effect and the babyface stereotype. However, OA showed weaker effects of attractiveness on impressions of untrustworthiness, and only OA associated higher babyfaceness with greater competence. There also was own-age accentuation, with both OA and YA showing stronger face stereotypes for faces closer to their own age. Age differences in the strength of the stereotypes reflected an OA positivity effect shown in more influence of positive facial qualities on impressions or less influence of negative ones, rather than vice versa.

CONCLUSION

OA own-age biases, previously shown in emotion, age, and identity recognition, and OA positivity effects, previously revealed in attention, memory, and social judgments, also influence age differences in the strength and content of appearance stereotypes. Future research should assess implications of these results for age-related differences in susceptibility to appearance biases that YA have shown in socially significant domains, such as judicial and personnel decisions.

摘要

未标注

背景/研究背景:在人物认知中,有两个有充分文献记载的现象,即吸引力光环效应(对更具吸引力的人有更积极的印象)和娃娃脸刻板印象(对娃娃脸特征更明显的人有更孩子气的印象),儿童、年轻人以及来自不同文化背景的人都有表现。这是第一项系统研究老年人面部刻板印象并比较年轻人和老年人面部效应的研究。

方法

年轻人和老年人评判者对老年人和年轻人中性表情面部的能力、健康状况、敌意、不可信度、吸引力和娃娃脸特征进行评分。多层次建模评估评判者年龄和面部年龄对外表刻板印象的影响。

结果

与年轻人一样,老年人也表现出吸引力光环效应和娃娃脸刻板印象。然而,老年人中吸引力对不可信度印象的影响较弱,只有老年人将更高的娃娃脸特征与更强的能力联系起来。此外还存在年龄相近偏差,年轻人和老年人对与自己年龄更接近的面部都表现出更强的面部刻板印象。刻板印象强度的年龄差异反映出老年人的积极效应,即正面面部特征对印象的影响更大,或者负面面部特征的影响更小,而不是相反。

结论

老年人在情感、年龄和身份识别方面先前表现出的年龄相近偏差,以及在注意力、记忆和社会判断方面先前揭示的老年人积极效应,也会影响外貌刻板印象强度和内容的年龄差异。未来的研究应评估这些结果对年轻人在司法和人事决策等社会重要领域中已表现出的外貌偏差易感性方面与年龄相关差异的影响。

相似文献

2
Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity.
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):202-12. doi: 10.1037/a0030927. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
3
Age and Gender Differences in Facial Attractiveness, but Not Emotion Resemblance, Contribute to Age and Gender Stereotypes.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01704. eCollection 2017.
4
Age Differences in the Differentiation of Trait Impressions From Faces.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Mar;71(2):220-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu113. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
6
Age similarities in recognizing threat from faces and diagnostic cues.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Sep;69(5):710-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt054. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
They don't all look alike: individuated impressions of other racial groups.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jul;65(1):85-101. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.1.85.
10
Visual scanning patterns and executive function in relation to facial emotion recognition in aging.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2013;20(2):148-73. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2012.675427. Epub 2012 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of facial attributions in leadership: Trustworthiness and age in Chinese mid-level management.
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0324508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324508. eCollection 2025.
2
First Impressions Towards Autistic People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Autism Res. 2025 May;18(5):983-1010. doi: 10.1002/aur.70019. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
4
Understanding trait impressions from faces.
Br J Psychol. 2022 Nov;113(4):1056-1078. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12583. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
5
Looking Like a Million Dollars: Does Attractiveness Priming Increase Altruistic Behavior in Experimental Games?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:658466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658466. eCollection 2021.
6
Interdisciplinary Lessons Learned While Researching Fake News.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:537612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537612. eCollection 2020.
7
Contrast Effect of Facial Attractiveness in Groups.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:2258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02258. eCollection 2020.
8
The effects of face attractiveness on face memory depend on both age of perceiver and age of face.
Cogn Emot. 2020 Aug;34(5):875-889. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1694491. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Judgements of a speaker's personality are correlated across differing content and stimulus type.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204991. eCollection 2018.
10
Glued to Which Face? Attentional Priority Effect of Female Babyface and Male Mature Face.
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00286. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
What's in a Face?: Facial Maturity and the Attribution of Legal Responsibility.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;14(1):23-33. doi: 10.1177/0146167288141003.
2
The Fascination of Wisdom: Its Nature, Ontogeny, and Function.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):56-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00062.x.
3
Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity.
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):202-12. doi: 10.1037/a0030927. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
4
Neural and behavioral bases of age differences in perceptions of trust.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 18;109(51):20848-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218518109. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
5
Facial appearance reflects human familial longevity and cardiovascular disease risk in healthy individuals.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Feb;68(2):145-52. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls154. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Let me guess how old you are: effects of age, gender, and facial expression on perceptions of age.
Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):265-77. doi: 10.1037/a0025065. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
7
Executive function on the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests.
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):110-23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0096-6.
8
Polling the face: prediction and consensus across cultures.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0017673.
10
Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or is Ugly Bad?
Soc Cogn. 2006 Apr;24(2):187-206. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.187.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验