Kim Jayoung, Kim Hyun Soo, Kim Han-Sung, Kim Jae-Seok, Song Wonkeun, Lee Kyu Man, Lee Sunhwa, Park Kyoung Un, Lee Woochang, Hong Young Jun
Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2014 May;34(3):216-22. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.216. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
We evaluated the analytical and clinical performances of the SD BIOLINE Rota/Adeno Rapid kit (SD Rota/Adeno Rapid; Standard Diagnostics, Inc., Korea), an immunochromatographic assay (ICA), for the simultaneous detection of rotaviruses and adenoviruses in human stool samples.
We tested 400 clinical stool samples from patients with acute gastroenteritis and compared the ICA results with the results obtained by using ELISA, enzyme-linked fluorescent assays (ELFA), PCR, and multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (mRT-PCR). To assess the analytical performance of the SD BIOLINE Rota/Adeno Rapid kit, we determined its detection limit, reproducibility, cross-reactivity, and analytical reactivity for adenovirus subtypes, and performed interference studies.
The overall agreement rates among the tested methods were 91.5% for rotavirus and 85.5% for adenovirus. On the basis of mRT-PCR, the overall agreement, positive agreement, and negative agreement rates of the ICA were 95.6%, 100%, and 94.9% for rotavirus, and 94.0%, 71.4%, and 94.8% for adenovirus, respectively. Using the ICA, we detected all the subtypes of adenovirus tested, but the analytical reactivities for adenovirus subtypes were different between the 4 adenovirus detection methods. The high reproducibility was confirmed, and no cross-reactivity or interference was detected.
The SD BIOLINE Rota/Adeno Rapid kit showed acceptable analytical and clinical performances. However, interpretation of adenovirus positive/negative result should be cautious because of different detectability for adenovirus subtypes among adenovirus detection methods.
我们评估了SD BIOLINE轮状病毒/腺病毒快速检测试剂盒(SD Rota/Adeno Rapid;韩国标准诊断公司)这一免疫层析法(ICA)在同时检测人类粪便样本中轮状病毒和腺病毒时的分析性能及临床性能。
我们检测了400份急性胃肠炎患者的临床粪便样本,并将ICA检测结果与酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、酶联荧光测定(ELFA)、聚合酶链反应(PCR)和多重逆转录聚合酶链反应(mRT-PCR)所获结果进行比较。为评估SD BIOLINE轮状病毒/腺病毒快速检测试剂盒的分析性能,我们测定了其检测限、重复性、交叉反应性以及对腺病毒亚型的分析反应性,并开展了干扰研究。
各检测方法之间,轮状病毒的总体符合率为91.5%,腺病毒为85.5%。基于mRT-PCR,ICA对轮状病毒的总体符合率、阳性符合率和阴性符合率分别为95.6%、100%和94.9%,对腺病毒分别为94.0%、71.4%和94.8%。使用ICA,我们检测到了所有测试的腺病毒亚型,但4种腺病毒检测方法对腺病毒亚型的分析反应性有所不同。证实了该试剂盒具有高重复性,且未检测到交叉反应或干扰。
SD BIOLINE轮状病毒/腺病毒快速检测试剂盒显示出可接受的分析性能和临床性能。然而,由于腺病毒检测方法对腺病毒亚型的检测能力不同,对腺病毒阳性/阴性结果的解读应谨慎。