Olofson Eric L, Casey Drew, Oluyedun Olufemi A, Van Herwegen Jo, Becerra Adam, Rundblad Gabriella
Wabash College, 301 W Wabash Ave, Crawfordsville, IN, 47933, USA,
J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Oct;44(10):2568-83. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2129-3.
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have difficulty comprehending metaphors. However, no study to date has examined whether or not they understand conceptual metaphors (i.e. mappings between conceptual structures), which could be the building blocks of metaphoric thinking and understanding. We investigated whether 13 participants with ASD (age 7;03-22;03) and 13 age-matched typically developing (TD) controls could comprehend lexicalized conceptual metaphors (e.g., Susan is a warm person) and novel ones (e.g., Susan is a toasty person). Individuals with ASD performed at greater than chance levels on both metaphor types, although their performance was lower than TD participants. We discuss the theoretical relevance of these findings and educational implications.
患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体在理解隐喻方面存在困难。然而,迄今为止尚无研究考察他们是否理解概念隐喻(即概念结构之间的映射),而概念隐喻可能是隐喻思维和理解的基石。我们调查了13名患有ASD的参与者(年龄7;03 - 22;03)以及13名年龄匹配的发育正常(TD)对照者是否能够理解词汇化的概念隐喻(例如,苏珊是个热情的人)和新颖的概念隐喻(例如,苏珊是个暖烘烘的人)。患有ASD的个体在这两种隐喻类型上的表现均高于随机水平,尽管他们的表现低于TD参与者。我们讨论了这些发现的理论相关性和教育意义。