Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, IAS-Research Centre for Life, Mind, and Society, University of the Basque Country San Sebastián, Spain ; Department of Informatics, Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, Centre for Research in Cognitive Science, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex Brighton, UK.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Mar 26;7:15. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00015. eCollection 2013.
In this article, I sketch an enactive account of autism. For the enactive approach to cognition, embodiment, experience, and social interaction are fundamental to understanding mind and subjectivity. Enaction defines cognition as sense-making: the way cognitive agents meaningfully connect with their world, based on their needs and goals as self-organizing, self-maintaining, embodied agents. In the social realm, the interactive coordination of embodied sense-making activities with others lets us participate in each other's sense-making (social understanding = participatory sense-making). The enactive approach provides new concepts to overcome the problems of traditional functionalist accounts of autism, which can only give a piecemeal and disintegrated view because they consider cognition, communication, and perception separately, do not take embodied into account, and are methodologically individualistic. Applying the concepts of enaction to autism, I show: How embodiment and sense-making connect, i.e., how autistic particularities of moving, perceiving, and emoting relate to how people with autism make sense of their world. For instance, restricted interests or preference for detail will have certain sensorimotor correlates, as well as specific meaning for autistic people.That reduced flexibility in interactional coordination correlates with difficulties in participatory sense-making. At the same time, seemingly irrelevant "autistic behaviors" can be quite attuned to the interactive context. I illustrate this complexity in the case of echolalia. An enactive account of autism starts from the embodiment, experience, and social interactions of autistic people. Enaction brings together the sensorimotor, cognitive, social, experiential, and affective aspects of autism in a coherent framework based on a complex non-linear multi-causality. This foundation allows to build new bridges between autistic people and their often non-autistic context, and to improve quality of life prospects.
本文勾勒了一种自闭症的能动性观点。对于认知的能动性方法,体现、体验和社会互动是理解心智和主观性的基础。能动性将认知定义为意义建构:认知主体基于其作为自我组织、自我维持的体现主体的需求和目标,与世界有意义地联系在一起的方式。在社会领域,体现意义建构活动与他人的互动协调使我们能够参与到彼此的意义建构中(社会理解=参与式意义建构)。能动性方法提供了新概念,以克服传统自闭症功能主义观点的问题,后者只能给出零碎和不完整的观点,因为它们分别考虑认知、沟通和感知,不考虑体现,并且在方法论上是个体主义的。将能动性的概念应用于自闭症,我展示了:体现和意义建构如何连接,即自闭症在运动、感知和情感方面的特殊性如何与自闭症患者理解世界的方式相关。例如,受限的兴趣或对细节的偏好将具有一定的感觉运动相关性,并且对自闭症患者具有特定的意义。互动协调的灵活性降低与参与式意义建构的困难相关。同时,看似无关的“自闭症行为”可能与互动背景非常协调。我以模仿言语为例说明了这种复杂性。自闭症的能动性观点从自闭症患者的体现、体验和社会互动出发。能动性将自闭症的感觉运动、认知、社会、体验和情感方面结合在一个基于复杂非线性多因果关系的连贯框架中。这个基础允许在自闭症患者及其非自闭症环境之间建立新的桥梁,并提高生活质量的前景。