• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英语和波兰语双语习得中的隐喻生成

Metaphor production in the bilingual acquisition of English and Polish.

作者信息

Gaskins Dorota, Rundblad Gabriella

机构信息

Education, Communication and Society, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1162486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162486. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162486
PMID:37599708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10434249/
Abstract

Metaphor acquisition research has focused mostly on metaphor comprehension in monolingual children. Ours is the first study to examine metaphor production in young bilinguals. A quantitative method was employed whereby sixty-two children aged three to six, with English and Polish, were tested on their ability to produce primary (e.g., a ) and perceptual resemblance metaphors (e.g., You're my ) in response to elicitation tasks. A univariate ANOVA revealed that the main factors to affect the production of conventional metaphors in bilingual children are their chronological age and their verbal skills in both English and Polish. No significant effect was found for nonverbal IQ, metaphor type, or testing language. These results are discussed in the context of both Conceptual Metaphor Theory, which has been concerned with the study of primary (and other conceptual) metaphors, and Structure Mapping Theory, which has focused on the use of perceptual resemblance metaphors. Usage-Based Theory is brought in to explain lexical effects in metaphor production.

摘要

隐喻习得研究主要集中在单语儿童的隐喻理解上。我们的研究是首次对双语幼儿的隐喻生成进行考察。采用了一种定量方法,对62名年龄在3至6岁、掌握英语和波兰语的儿童进行测试,以考察他们在引发任务中生成基本隐喻(如“a”)和感知相似性隐喻(如“你是我的……”)的能力。单因素方差分析显示,影响双语儿童生成传统隐喻的主要因素是他们的实际年龄以及他们在英语和波兰语方面的语言技能。未发现非语言智商、隐喻类型或测试语言有显著影响。我们将在概念隐喻理论(该理论关注基本隐喻(及其他概念隐喻)的研究)和结构映射理论(该理论专注于感知相似性隐喻的运用)的背景下讨论这些结果。引入基于用法的理论来解释隐喻生成中的词汇效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/8e46d37f50a7/fpsyg-14-1162486-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/083f199c66cc/fpsyg-14-1162486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/d805a56a5ac9/fpsyg-14-1162486-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/820ae6d67a41/fpsyg-14-1162486-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/685154988ba9/fpsyg-14-1162486-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/bf23fe5c0ccb/fpsyg-14-1162486-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/e1a6d37a5c05/fpsyg-14-1162486-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/8e46d37f50a7/fpsyg-14-1162486-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/083f199c66cc/fpsyg-14-1162486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/d805a56a5ac9/fpsyg-14-1162486-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/820ae6d67a41/fpsyg-14-1162486-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/685154988ba9/fpsyg-14-1162486-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/bf23fe5c0ccb/fpsyg-14-1162486-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/e1a6d37a5c05/fpsyg-14-1162486-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a3a/10434249/8e46d37f50a7/fpsyg-14-1162486-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Metaphor production in the bilingual acquisition of English and Polish.英语和波兰语双语习得中的隐喻生成
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1162486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162486. eCollection 2023.
2
Interpretation of familiar metaphors and proverbs by Polish people in middle and late adulthood.波兰中老年人对常见隐喻和谚语的解读。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jul;56(4):841-857. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12631. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
3
To electrify bilingualism: Electrophysiological insights into bilingual metaphor comprehension.使双语现象电气化:双语隐喻理解的电生理洞察
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12(4):e0175578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175578. eCollection 2017.
4
Metaphor comprehension in the acquisition of Arabic.阿拉伯语习得中的隐喻理解
J Child Lang. 2025 Mar;52(2):334-354. doi: 10.1017/S0305000923000740. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Metaphor comprehension and production in verbally able children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍患儿的隐喻理解和产生。
Autism Res. 2024 Nov;17(11):2292-2304. doi: 10.1002/aur.3210. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
6
Are Older Bilinguals' Better in Metaphor Generation?老年人在隐喻生成方面表现更好吗?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Aug;52(4):1183-1204. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09929-w. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
7
A metaphorical advantage for bilingual children? Understanding figurative meaning by L2 and L3 EFL learners.双语儿童的隐喻优势?二语和三语英语外语学习者对比喻意义的理解
J Child Lang. 2024 Mar;51(2):339-358. doi: 10.1017/S0305000923000065. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
How Does L1 and L2 Exposure Impact L1 Performance in Bilingual Children? Evidence from Polish-English Migrants to the United Kingdom.第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)接触如何影响双语儿童的第一语言表现?来自波兰裔英国移民的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 4;8:1444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01444. eCollection 2017.
9
Home Language Will Not Take Care of Itself: Vocabulary Knowledge in Trilingual Children in the United Kingdom.母语不会自行发展:英国三语儿童的词汇知识
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 10;8:1358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01358. eCollection 2017.
10
The relationship between metaphor skills and Theory of Mind in middle childhood: Task and developmental effects.隐喻技能与儿童中期心理理论的关系:任务和发展效应。
Cognition. 2023 Sep;238:105504. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105504. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Budding metaphors: Input-output effects in metaphor production.新兴隐喻:隐喻生成中的输入-输出效应
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0323420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323420. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Metaphor comprehension in the acquisition of Arabic.阿拉伯语习得中的隐喻理解
J Child Lang. 2025 Mar;52(2):334-354. doi: 10.1017/S0305000923000740. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Error analysis of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.脑性瘫痪患儿瑞文彩色推理测验的误差分析。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 Jul;67(7):655-667. doi: 10.1111/jir.13034. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
3
The Age-Related Changes in Speed of Visual Perception, Visual Verbal and Visuomotor Performance, and Nonverbal Intelligence During Early School Years.
学龄早期视觉感知速度、视觉言语和视动表现以及非言语智力的年龄相关变化。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Aug 17;15:667612. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.667612. eCollection 2021.
4
Interpreting physical and mental metaphors: Is Theory of Mind associated with pragmatics in middle childhood?解读身心隐喻:心理理论是否与儿童中期的语用学有关?
J Child Lang. 2019 Mar;46(2):393-407. doi: 10.1017/S030500091800048X. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
5
On the Problem and Promise of Metaphor Use in Science and Science Communication.论科学及科学传播中隐喻使用的问题与前景。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Mar 30;19(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1538. eCollection 2018.
6
How Does L1 and L2 Exposure Impact L1 Performance in Bilingual Children? Evidence from Polish-English Migrants to the United Kingdom.第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)接触如何影响双语儿童的第一语言表现?来自波兰裔英国移民的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 4;8:1444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01444. eCollection 2017.
7
Different Executive Functions Support Different Kinds of Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From 2-, 3-, and 4-Year-Olds.不同的执行功能支持不同类型的认知灵活性:来自2岁、3岁和4岁儿童的证据。
Child Dev. 2016 Mar-Apr;87(2):513-26. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12468. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
8
Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading.执行控制中的个体差异与隐喻加工有关:一项句子阅读的眼动研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 13;8:1057. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057. eCollection 2014.
9
Youth with autism spectrum disorder comprehend lexicalized and novel primary conceptual metaphors.患有自闭症谱系障碍的青少年能够理解词汇化的和新颖的基本概念隐喻。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Oct;44(10):2568-83. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2129-3.
10
The measure matters: Language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish-English bilingual children.该测量很重要:西班牙语-英语双语儿童在各项测量中的语言优势概况。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2012 Jul;15(3):616-629. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000090. Epub 2012 Mar 20.