• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同的最终冲洗激活系统对根管内玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜评估

A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems.

作者信息

Dua Deepti, Dua Ankur, Uppin Veerendra M

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Private Practice, New Delhi, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Jan;5(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.128661.

DOI:10.4103/0976-237X.128661
PMID:24808693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4012115/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare smear layer removal at apical 1 mm level after final irrigation activation with an EndoVac system and Max-I probe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups after completing cleaning and shaping with ProTaper rotary files. In one group, final irrigation was performed with an EndoVac system while in the other group final irrigation was performed with a 30 gauge Max-I probe. 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetracetic acid were used as final irrigants in all teeth. After instrumentation and irrigation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally into buccal and palatal halves and viewed under a scanning electron microscope for evaluation of the smear layer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

The EndoVac group showed significantly better smear layer removal compared with the Max-I probe at the apical 1 mm level.

CONCLUSION

An apical negative pressure system (EndoVac) results in better debridement at apical 1 mm when compared with side-vented closed ended needle irrigation (Max-I probe).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用EndoVac系统和Max - I探针进行最终冲洗激活后,根尖1毫米处玷污层的去除情况。

材料与方法

50颗新鲜拔除的上颌中切牙在使用ProTaper旋转锉完成清理和成形后,随机分为两组。一组使用EndoVac系统进行最终冲洗,另一组使用30号Max - I探针进行最终冲洗。所有牙齿均使用3%次氯酸钠和17%乙二胺四乙酸作为最终冲洗液。在进行器械操作和冲洗后,将牙齿纵向切成颊侧和腭侧两半,置于扫描电子显微镜下观察玷污层,以进行评估。使用Kruskal Wallis检验和Mann - Whitney U检验进行统计分析。

结果

在根尖1毫米处,EndoVac组的玷污层去除效果明显优于Max - I探针组。

结论

与侧孔封闭式针头冲洗(Max - I探针)相比,根尖负压系统(EndoVac)在根尖1毫米处能实现更好的清创效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/4012115/d74d76aedd3a/CCD-5-37-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/4012115/b0769999324b/CCD-5-37-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/4012115/d6f72846fca0/CCD-5-37-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/4012115/d74d76aedd3a/CCD-5-37-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/4012115/b0769999324b/CCD-5-37-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/4012115/d6f72846fca0/CCD-5-37-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e651/4012115/d74d76aedd3a/CCD-5-37-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems.两种不同的最终冲洗激活系统对根管内玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜评估
Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Jan;5(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.128661.
2
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of EndoVac irrigation system to Max-I probe in removing smear layer in apical 1 mm and 3 mm of root canal: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study.EndoVac冲洗系统与Max-I探针在去除根管根尖1mm和3mm处玷污层效果的比较评估:一项体外扫描电子显微镜研究
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Jan-Feb;12(1):38-43. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.150329.
3
A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Apical Negative Pressure (EndoVac), Sonic Irrigation (EndoActivator) and Er:YAG laser -An SEM Study.使用根尖负压(EndoVac)、声波冲洗(EndoActivator)和铒钇铝石榴石激光去除玷污层的比较评估——一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e981-e987. doi: 10.4317/jced.53881. eCollection 2017 Aug.
4
Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.使用不同冲洗系统(EndoActivator、EndoVac和被动超声冲洗)去除玷污层和清洁根管:一项体外研究的场发射扫描电子显微镜评估
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
5
A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.主动与被动根管冲洗系统的清创效果与根尖挤出率比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-12.
6
Comparison of Endovac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study.Endovac冲洗系统与传统冲洗方法去除根管内玷污层的比较:一项体外研究
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Sep;112(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
SEM Evaluation of Various Intracanal Irrigation Devices on Smear Layer Removal: A Comparative Study.SEM 评价不同根管冲洗设备对玷污层去除的效果:一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):184-188.
8
Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.改良EndoVac技术与不同冲洗系统对根管峡部清创效果的比较评估
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1676-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
10
Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study.使用EndoVac与传统针管冲洗法清除根管壁碎屑的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Oct;4(4):432-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123019.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Endovac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study.Endovac冲洗系统与传统冲洗方法去除根管内玷污层的比较:一项体外研究
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Sep;112(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
2
Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery.侧排针正压冲洗输送对根管清理中气锁现象的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):745-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
3
Effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on irrigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation system.
根管预备锥度和预备大小对使用负压冲洗系统输送冲洗液量的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):721-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.028. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
4
Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.根管器械预备后 EndoActivator 系统清除玷污层的效果。
J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.029. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
5
Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices.当代冲洗液搅拌技术与装置综述
J Endod. 2009 Jun;35(6):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010.
6
Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.恒牙根管预备后使用SmearClear和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)去除玷污层效果的扫描电子显微镜初步研究
J Endod. 2008 Dec;34(12):1541-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal.三种螯合剂去除玷污层效果的比较。
J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.023.
8
Microporous, demineralized collagen matrices in intact radicular dentin created by commonly used calcium-depleting endodontic irrigants.常用的脱钙牙髓冲洗剂在完整的牙根牙本质中形成的微孔脱矿化胶原基质。
J Endod. 2007 Sep;33(9):1086-90. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.04.017. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
9
Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals.EndoVac系统与根管内冲洗针的比较。
J Endod. 2007 May;33(5):611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.020. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
10
Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.玷污层对根管充填封闭能力的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Endod. 2007 Feb;33(2):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.007.