Cohen Jacob T, Benyamini Limor
Voice and Swallowing Disorders Clinic, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2014 Apr 28;5(2):e0011. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10145. eCollection 2014 Apr.
To compare pathologic results obtained via in-office transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL) to those of subsequent direct laryngoscopy in order to assess the accuracy of TFL as a diagnostic tool.
One hundred and seventeen patients with suspicious laryngeal lesions.
All patients underwent in-office biopsies. All patients with malignant diagnosis were referred to treatment. All patients with benign diagnosis or carcinoma in situ were referred to direct laryngoscopy for definitive diagnosis. The pathological results of the specimens from both procedures were compared.
Adequate tissue for diagnostic purposes was obtained in 110 of 117 in-office transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy biopsies (94.0%). The biopsy results revealed invasive carcinoma in 42 patients (38.2%), carcinoma in situ (CIS) in 17 patients (15.4%), and benign lesions in 51 patients (46.4%). All patients with benign pathologies and carcinoma in situ were referred to biopsy under direct laryngoscopy (five patients refused and were removed from the statistics). The final pathologies identified from the biopsies on direct laryngoscopy revealed that there was an underestimation of the transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy results in 33 patients (a false negative rate of 31.4%, 33/105) and an overestimation in one patient. The sensitivity of transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy biopsy compared with direct laryngoscopy biopsy was 70.6% and the specificity was 96.7%.
TFL with biopsy is easy, safe, and cost-effective but raises serious doubts about its clinical value due to its low sensitivity rate for diagnosing suspicious lesions of the larynx. As such, it is recommended that all patients with a suspicious lesion diagnosed by TFL biopsy as being benign or CIS should be referred to direct laryngoscopy for verification of the findings.
比较门诊经鼻纤维喉镜检查(TFL)获得的病理结果与后续直接喉镜检查的结果,以评估TFL作为诊断工具的准确性。
117例喉部病变可疑患者。
所有患者均接受门诊活检。所有诊断为恶性的患者均接受治疗。所有诊断为良性或原位癌的患者均接受直接喉镜检查以明确诊断。比较两种检查方法所取标本的病理结果。
117例门诊经鼻纤维喉镜活检中有110例(94.0%)获取了足够用于诊断的组织。活检结果显示,42例患者(38.2%)为浸润性癌,17例患者(15.4%)为原位癌(CIS),51例患者(46.4%)为良性病变。所有良性病变和原位癌患者均接受直接喉镜下活检(5例患者拒绝,未纳入统计)。直接喉镜检查活检的最终病理结果显示,经鼻纤维喉镜检查结果低估了33例患者的病情(假阴性率为31.4%,33/105),高估了1例患者的病情。经鼻纤维喉镜活检与直接喉镜活检相比,敏感性为70.6%,特异性为96.7%。
经鼻纤维喉镜活检操作简便、安全且经济有效,但由于其对喉部可疑病变的诊断敏感性较低,其临床价值令人严重怀疑。因此,建议所有经鼻纤维喉镜活检诊断为良性或原位癌的可疑病变患者均应接受直接喉镜检查以核实检查结果。