Pandit J J
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Scientifica (Cairo). 2014;2014:394270. doi: 10.1155/2014/394270. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
In assessing whether volatile anaesthetics directly depress the carotid body response to hypoxia it is necessary to combine in meta-analysis studies of when it is "functionally isolated" (e.g., recordings are made from its afferent nerve). Key articles were retrieved (full papers in English) and subjected to quantitative analysis to yield an aggregate estimate of effect. Results from articles that did not use such methodology were assessed separately from this quantitative approach, to see what could be learned also from a nonquantitative overview. Just 7 articles met the inclusion criteria for hypoxia and just 6 articles for hypercapnia. Within these articles, the anaesthetic (mean dose 0.75, standard deviation (SD) 0.40 minimum alveolar concentration, MAC) statistically significantly depressed carotid body hypoxic response by 24% (P = 0.041), but a similar dose (mean 0.81 (0.42) MAC) did not affect the hypercapnic response. The articles not included in the quantitative analysis (31 articles), assessed qualitatively, also indicated that anaesthetics depress carotid body function. This conclusion helps direct future research on the anaesthetic effects on putative cellular/molecular processes that underlie the transduction of hypoxia in the carotid body.
在评估挥发性麻醉剂是否直接抑制颈动脉体对缺氧的反应时,有必要在荟萃分析中纳入关于其“功能隔离”(例如,从其传入神经进行记录)的研究。检索了关键文章(英文全文)并进行定量分析,以得出综合效应估计值。未采用此类方法的文章结果与这种定量方法分开评估,以了解从非定量概述中还能学到什么。只有7篇文章符合缺氧纳入标准,只有6篇文章符合高碳酸血症纳入标准。在这些文章中,麻醉剂(平均剂量0.75,标准差(SD)0.40最低肺泡浓度,MAC)在统计学上显著降低颈动脉体缺氧反应24%(P = 0.041),但相似剂量(平均0.81(0.42)MAC)不影响高碳酸血症反应。定性评估的未纳入定量分析的文章(31篇)也表明麻醉剂会抑制颈动脉体功能。这一结论有助于指导未来关于麻醉剂对颈动脉体缺氧转导潜在细胞/分子过程影响的研究。