• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响州级清洁室内空气法颁布的政治因素。

Political factors affecting the enactment of state-level clean indoor air laws.

机构信息

Gregory J. Tung is with the Pediatric Injury Prevention, Education, and Research Program and the Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy at the Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora. Jon S. Vernick and Daniel W. Webster are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, and Elizabeth A. Stuart is with the departments of Mental Health and Biostatistics at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):e92-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301689. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301689
PMID:24825239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4062011/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined the effects of key political institutional factors on the advancement of state-level clean indoor air laws.

METHODS

We performed an observational study of state-level clean indoor air law enactment among all 50 US states from 1993 to 2010 by using extended Cox hazard models to assess risk of enacting a relevant law.

RESULTS

During the 18-year period from 1993 to 2010, 28 states passed a law covering workplaces, 33 states passed a law covering restaurants, 29 states passed a law covering bars, and 16 states passed a law covering gaming facilities. States with term limits had a 2.15 times greater hazard (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27, 3.65; P = .005) of enacting clean indoor air laws. The presence of state-level preemption of local clean indoor air laws was associated with a 3.26 times greater hazard (95% CI = 1.11, 9.53; P = .031) of state-level policy enactment. In the presence of preemption, increased legislative professionalism was strongly associated (hazard ratio = 3.28; 95% CI = 1.10, 9.75; P = .033) with clean indoor air law enactment.

CONCLUSIONS

Political institutional factors do influence state-level clean indoor air law enactment and may be relevant to other public health policy areas.

摘要

目的

我们考察了主要政治体制因素对州级清洁室内空气法推进的影响。

方法

我们对 1993 年至 2010 年间全美 50 个州的清洁室内空气法制定情况进行了一项观察性研究,使用扩展的 Cox 风险模型来评估制定相关法律的风险。

结果

在 1993 年至 2010 年的 18 年期间,28 个州通过了覆盖工作场所的法律,33 个州通过了覆盖餐馆的法律,29 个州通过了覆盖酒吧的法律,16 个州通过了覆盖博彩设施的法律。有任期限制的州制定清洁室内空气法的风险是其他州的 2.15 倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.27,3.65;P =.005)。州级对地方清洁室内空气法的预先阻止的存在与州级政策制定的风险增加 3.26 倍相关(95%CI = 1.11,9.53;P =.031)。在存在预先阻止的情况下,立法专业性的提高与清洁室内空气法的制定密切相关(风险比=3.28;95%CI = 1.10,9.75;P =.033)。

结论

政治体制因素确实会影响州级清洁室内空气法的制定,这可能与其他公共卫生政策领域有关。

相似文献

1
Political factors affecting the enactment of state-level clean indoor air laws.影响州级清洁室内空气法颁布的政治因素。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):e92-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301689. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
2
An Association Between State Laws Limiting Local Control and Community Smoke-Free Indoor Air in the United States.美国限制地方控制权的州法律与社区室内无烟空气之间的关联。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241280905. doi: 10.1177/21501319241280905.
3
Effectiveness of Indiana's Statewide Smoke-Free Indoor Air Law in Reducing Prevalence of Adult Cigarette Smoking.印第安纳州全州无烟室内空气法降低成人吸烟率的效果。
J Prim Prev. 2020 Apr;41(2):87-103. doi: 10.1007/s10935-020-00579-z.
4
The pattern of indoor smoking restriction law transitions, 1970-2009: laws are sticky.1970-2009 年室内吸烟限制法律的转变模式:法律具有粘性。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Aug;103(8):e44-51. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301449. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA).评分系统在美国各州室内空气清洁法中的应用。
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):26-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.26.
6
The economic impact of clean indoor air laws.清洁室内空气法的经济影响。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Nov-Dec;57(6):367-78. doi: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367.
7
Clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes, and smoking: Results from the current population survey-tobacco use supplement, 2003-2011.室内空气清洁法规、香烟消费税和吸烟:2003-2011 年当前人口调查-烟草使用补充调查的结果。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105744. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
8
Clean indoor air: where, why, and how.清洁室内空气:何处、为何以及如何实现
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3 Suppl):75-82.
9
Association between clean indoor air laws and voluntary smokefree rules in homes and cars.室内空气清洁法与家庭和汽车中自愿性无烟规定之间的关联。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(2):168-74. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051121. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
10
State and Local Comprehensive Smoke-Free Laws for Worksites, Restaurants, and Bars - United States, 2015.州和地方综合性工作场所、餐馆和酒吧无烟法律 - 美国,2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jun 24;65(24):623-6. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6524a4.

引用本文的文献

1
National Support for a Menthol Cigarette Sales Ban.国家对薄荷醇香烟销售禁令的支持。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Mar-Apr;136(2):183-191. doi: 10.1177/0033354920966004. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Public Support for E-Cigarette-related Policies among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.美国成年人全国代表性样本对电子烟相关政策的公众支持情况。
Tob Use Insights. 2020 Oct 9;13:1179173X20959700. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20959700. eCollection 2020.
3
Uneven Access to Smoke-Free Laws and Policies and Its Effect on Health Equity in the United States: 2000-2019.美国无烟法律和政策的不平等获取及其对健康公平性的影响:2000-2019 年。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1568-1575. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305289. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
4
Local Public Health Policymakers' Views on State Preemption: Results of a National Survey, 2018.地方公共卫生政策制定者对州级先行的看法:2018 年全国调查结果。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Aug;109(8):1107-1110. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305140. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
5
Inequities in coverage of smokefree outdoor space policies within the United States: school grounds and playgrounds.美国无烟户外空间政策覆盖范围的不平等:学校场地和操场。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5602-7.
6
Are political views related to smoking and support for tobacco control policies? A survey across 28 European countries.政治观点与吸烟及对烟草控制政策的支持有关吗?一项针对28个欧洲国家的调查。
Tob Induc Dis. 2017 Dec 8;15:45. doi: 10.1186/s12971-017-0151-x. eCollection 2017.
7
Impact of US smoke-free air laws on restaurants and bars by employer size: a panel study.美国无烟空气法对不同规模雇主经营的餐厅和酒吧的影响:一项面板研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 25;7(11):e018137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018137.
8
Inequities in coverage of smokefree space policies within the United States.美国无烟空间政策覆盖范围的不平等现象。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 16;17(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4385-6.
9
Perceptions Regarding Importance and Skill at Policy Development Among Public Health Staff.公共卫生工作人员对政策制定的重要性及技能的认知
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Nov-Dec;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S141-50. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000324.
10
Diffusion of Impaired Driving Laws Among US States.美国各州酒后驾车法律的传播情况。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep;105(9):1893-900. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302670. Epub 2015 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥18 years with mental illness - United States, 2009-2011.生命体征:2009-2011 年美国≥18 岁有精神疾病的成年人中当前吸烟状况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Feb 8;62(5):81-7.
2
Legislator voting and behavioral science theory: a systematic review.立法者投票与行为科学理论:一项系统综述。
Am J Health Behav. 2012 Nov;36(6):823-33. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.36.6.9.
3
Coded statutory data sets for evaluation of public health law.用于评估公共卫生法的编码法定数据集。
Eval Rev. 2012 Jun;36(3):220-37. doi: 10.1177/0193841X12452735.
4
Assessing the impact of federal and state preemption in public health: a framework for decision makers.评估联邦和州在公共卫生方面的先占权的影响:决策者框架。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):213-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182582a57.
5
The impact of state preemption of local smoking restrictions on public health protections and changes in social norms.州政府对地方禁烟令的干预对公共卫生保护和社会规范变化的影响。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:632629. doi: 10.1155/2012/632629. Epub 2012 May 10.
6
The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors.美国可预防的死亡原因:饮食、生活方式及代谢风险因素的比较风险评估
PLoS Med. 2009 Apr 28;6(4):e1000058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058.
7
Competing initiatives: a new tobacco industry strategy to oppose statewide clean indoor air ballot measures.相互竞争的举措:烟草行业反对全州范围内室内空气清洁投票措施的新策略。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):430-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.138461. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
8
Preventing childhood obesity through state policy. Predictors of bill enactment.通过国家政策预防儿童肥胖。法案颁布的预测因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Apr;34(4):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.003.
9
The economic impact of clean indoor air laws.清洁室内空气法的经济影响。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Nov-Dec;57(6):367-78. doi: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367.
10
The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know?室内空气清洁法的影响:我们知道什么以及我们需要知道什么?
Health Educ Res. 2003 Oct;18(5):592-609. doi: 10.1093/her/cyf045.