Suppr超能文献

频繁评估可能掩盖认知能力下降。

Frequent assessments may obscure cognitive decline.

作者信息

Salthouse Timothy A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1063-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000007. Epub 2014 May 19.

Abstract

Effects of an initial testing experience on the level of cognitive performance at a 2nd occasion are well documented. However, less is known about the effects of additional testing experiences beyond the 1st on the amount of cognitive change over a specified interval. This issue was investigated in a moderately large sample of adults between 18 and 95 years of age who performed a battery of cognitive tests either 2 or 3 times at variable intervals between each assessment. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine effects of the number of assessments on change while controlling the length of the interval between the 1st and last assessments. Change in each of 5 cognitive domains was less negative when there was an intervening assessment. To illustrate, for adults between 65 and 95 years of age, the estimated change from a 1st to a 2nd assessment across an average interval of 3.9 years was -.25 standard deviation units (p < .01), but it was only -.06 standard deviation units, and not significantly different from 0, when an intervening assessment occurred during the interval. These results indicate that cognitive change may not be detected when individuals are assessed frequently with relatively short intervals between the assessments.

摘要

初次测试经历对第二次认知表现水平的影响已有充分记录。然而,对于第一次测试之后的额外测试经历对特定时间段内认知变化量的影响,我们了解得较少。在一个年龄介于18至95岁之间的适度规模成年样本中对这一问题进行了研究,这些成年人在每次评估之间以可变间隔进行了2次或3次认知测试。在控制第一次和最后一次评估之间间隔时长的同时,使用多元回归分析来检验评估次数对变化的影响。当有中间评估时,5个认知领域中每个领域的变化的负面程度都较小。举例来说,对于65至95岁的成年人,在平均3.9年的间隔内从第一次评估到第二次评估的估计变化为-.25标准差单位(p < .01),但当在该间隔内有中间评估时,变化仅为-.06标准差单位,且与0无显著差异。这些结果表明,当个体被频繁评估且评估之间间隔相对较短时,可能检测不到认知变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8226/4237696/5accf6f1f3b6/nihms-593334-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequent assessments may obscure cognitive decline.频繁评估可能掩盖认知能力下降。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1063-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000007. Epub 2014 May 19.
3
The paradox of cognitive change.认知变化的悖论。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Jul;32(6):622-9. doi: 10.1080/13803390903401310. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
4
Why is cognitive change more negative with increased age?为什么认知变化随着年龄的增长而变得更加负面?
Neuropsychology. 2018 Jan;32(1):110-120. doi: 10.1037/neu0000397. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Effects of age on time-dependent cognitive change.年龄对时变认知变化的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):682-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611404900. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

6
Why is cognitive change more negative with increased age?为什么认知变化随着年龄的增长而变得更加负面?
Neuropsychology. 2018 Jan;32(1):110-120. doi: 10.1037/neu0000397. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scores Over Time.蒙特利尔认知评估量表评分随时间的变化。
Assessment. 2017 Sep;24(6):772-777. doi: 10.1177/1073191116654217. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
9
Practice and retest effects in longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning.认知功能纵向研究中的练习和重测效应。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Mar 29;1(1):101-2. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.02.002. eCollection 2015 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlates of cognitive change.认知变化的相关因素。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1026-1048. doi: 10.1037/a0034847. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
3
Selectivity of attrition in longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning.认知功能纵向研究中的损耗选择性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;69(4):567-74. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt046. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
4
Evaluating the correspondence of different cognitive batteries.评估不同认知测试组合的一致性。
Assessment. 2014 Apr;21(2):131-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486690. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
6
Robust cognitive change.认知能力的显著变化。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Jul;18(4):749-56. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000380. Epub 2012 May 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验