Salthouse Timothy A
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia.
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1063-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000007. Epub 2014 May 19.
Effects of an initial testing experience on the level of cognitive performance at a 2nd occasion are well documented. However, less is known about the effects of additional testing experiences beyond the 1st on the amount of cognitive change over a specified interval. This issue was investigated in a moderately large sample of adults between 18 and 95 years of age who performed a battery of cognitive tests either 2 or 3 times at variable intervals between each assessment. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine effects of the number of assessments on change while controlling the length of the interval between the 1st and last assessments. Change in each of 5 cognitive domains was less negative when there was an intervening assessment. To illustrate, for adults between 65 and 95 years of age, the estimated change from a 1st to a 2nd assessment across an average interval of 3.9 years was -.25 standard deviation units (p < .01), but it was only -.06 standard deviation units, and not significantly different from 0, when an intervening assessment occurred during the interval. These results indicate that cognitive change may not be detected when individuals are assessed frequently with relatively short intervals between the assessments.
初次测试经历对第二次认知表现水平的影响已有充分记录。然而,对于第一次测试之后的额外测试经历对特定时间段内认知变化量的影响,我们了解得较少。在一个年龄介于18至95岁之间的适度规模成年样本中对这一问题进行了研究,这些成年人在每次评估之间以可变间隔进行了2次或3次认知测试。在控制第一次和最后一次评估之间间隔时长的同时,使用多元回归分析来检验评估次数对变化的影响。当有中间评估时,5个认知领域中每个领域的变化的负面程度都较小。举例来说,对于65至95岁的成年人,在平均3.9年的间隔内从第一次评估到第二次评估的估计变化为-.25标准差单位(p < .01),但当在该间隔内有中间评估时,变化仅为-.06标准差单位,且与0无显著差异。这些结果表明,当个体被频繁评估且评估之间间隔相对较短时,可能检测不到认知变化。