Amlung Michael, MacKillop James
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;28(3):761-8. doi: 10.1037/a0036726. Epub 2014 May 19.
Impulsive delayed reward discounting (DRD) has been linked to nicotine dependence, but with some inconsistency. This may be related to the considerable variability in the literature with regard to the DRD assessments used, particularly in the case of the reward magnitudes assessed. In addition, previous studies have often not considered concurrent substance use when examining the relationship between DRD and nicotine dependence. The current study sought to further clarify the relationship between DRD and nicotine dependence by characterizing DRD across diverse reward magnitudes and incorporating other substance use. Daily smokers (N = 933) were assessed for DRD preferences across nine reward magnitudes (delayed reward range: $2.50-$850), comorbid substance use, and relevant demographic variables (age, education, income). A significant large effect size magnitude effect was found for DRD, reflecting steeper discounting for smaller delayed rewards, but significant correlations across magnitudes also suggested similar relative levels of discounting. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to generate a single latent index of discounting across all magnitudes that accounted for 69% of the total variance. In correlation and regression analyses, steeper composite DRD was significantly associated with nicotine dependence severity. This relationship remained statistically significant after incorporating demographic variables and alcohol and illicit drug use. These findings provide evidence of a specific link between impulsive DRD and nicotine dependence and reveal that this association is robust across a broad range of monetary rewards. The study also demonstrates the utility of using PCA to generate latent indices of delay discounting across multiple magnitudes of delayed reward.
冲动性延迟奖励折扣(DRD)与尼古丁依赖有关,但存在一些不一致之处。这可能与文献中所使用的DRD评估方法存在相当大的变异性有关,尤其是在所评估的奖励幅度方面。此外,以往的研究在考察DRD与尼古丁依赖之间的关系时,往往没有考虑同时使用其他物质的情况。当前的研究试图通过刻画不同奖励幅度下的DRD并纳入其他物质使用情况,进一步阐明DRD与尼古丁依赖之间的关系。对每日吸烟者(N = 933)进行了评估,考察他们在九种奖励幅度(延迟奖励范围:2.50美元至850美元)下的DRD偏好、共病物质使用情况以及相关人口统计学变量(年龄、教育程度、收入)。发现DRD存在显著的大效应量幅度效应,反映出对较小延迟奖励的折扣更陡峭,但各幅度之间的显著相关性也表明折扣的相对水平相似。主成分分析(PCA)用于生成一个涵盖所有幅度的单一潜在折扣指数,该指数占总方差的69%。在相关性和回归分析中,更陡峭的综合DRD与尼古丁依赖严重程度显著相关。在纳入人口统计学变量以及酒精和非法药物使用情况后,这种关系在统计学上仍然显著。这些发现提供了冲动性DRD与尼古丁依赖之间存在特定联系的证据,并表明这种关联在广泛的金钱奖励范围内是稳健的。该研究还证明了使用PCA生成跨多个延迟奖励幅度的延迟折扣潜在指数的效用。