Osafune Clinic Okayama Japan ; Department of Internal Medicine Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital Okayama Japan.
Department of Medicine and Clinical Science Okayama Japan ; Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine Okayama University Hospital Okayama Japan.
J Diabetes Investig. 2013 Mar 18;4(2):195-201. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12004. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have pointed to the effectiveness of combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) for diabetic nephropathy. However, some controversy over this combination treatment remains and the mechanisms underlying its renoprotective effects have not been fully clarified. Therefore, we compared the renoprotective effects of imidapril (ACEI) and losartan (ARB) combination therapy with losartan monotherapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy. We also compared the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress effects of these two treatments.
A total of 32 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy were enrolled. Patients were randomized to either 100 mg/day losartan (n = 16) or 50 mg/day losartan plus 5 mg/day imidapril (n = 16). We evaluated clinical parameters, serum concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), interleukin-18 (IL-18) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and the urinary concentrations of IL-18, MCP-1 and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) at 24 and 48 weeks after starting treatment.
Blood pressure was not significantly different between the two groups. The serum levels of hs-CRP, sICAM-1 and IL-18, as well as urinary excretion of albumin, IL-18 and 8-OHdG decreased significantly in the combination therapy group at 48 weeks. The percent decreases in serum IL-18 concentrations and urinary IL-18 and 8-OHdG were significantly greater in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group.
Combination therapy with an ACEI and an ARB could be beneficial for treating diabetic nephropathy through its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress effects.
目的/引言:最近的研究表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)联合治疗糖尿病肾病是有效的。然而,这种联合治疗仍存在一些争议,其肾保护作用的机制尚未完全阐明。因此,我们比较了依那普利(ACEI)和氯沙坦(ARB)联合治疗与氯沙坦单药治疗糖尿病肾病患者的肾保护作用。我们还比较了这两种治疗方法的抗炎和抗氧化应激作用。
共纳入 32 例日本 2 型糖尿病肾病患者。患者随机分为 100mg/d 氯沙坦(n=16)或 50mg/d 氯沙坦加 5mg/d 依那普利(n=16)组。我们评估了临床参数、血清高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(sICAM-1)、白细胞介素-18(IL-18)和单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)浓度,以及治疗 24 和 48 周后尿中 IL-18、MCP-1 和 8-羟基-2'-脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)浓度。
两组血压无显著差异。联合治疗组治疗 48 周后血清 hs-CRP、sICAM-1 和 IL-18 水平以及尿白蛋白、IL-18 和 8-OHdG 排泄量均显著下降。联合治疗组血清 IL-18 浓度、尿中 IL-18 和 8-OHdG 下降百分比均显著大于单药组。
ACEI 和 ARB 联合治疗可能通过抗炎和抗氧化应激作用有益于治疗糖尿病肾病。