• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察动作中的动态概率与可预测性分离:一项 fMRI 研究。

Dissociating dynamic probability and predictability in observed actions-an fMRI study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Münster Münster, Germany ; Motor Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research Cologne, Germany.

Department of Sport and Health Science, Technische Universität München Munich, Germany ; Department of Cognitive Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 7;8:273. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00273. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00273
PMID:24847235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4019881/
Abstract

The present fMRI study investigated whether human observers spontaneously exploit the statistical structure underlying continuous action sequences. In particular, we tested whether two different statistical properties can be distinguished with regard to their neural correlates: an action step's predictability and its probability. To assess these properties we used measures from information theory. Predictability of action steps was operationalized by its inverse, conditional entropy, which combines the number of possible action steps with their respective probabilities. Probability of action steps was assessed using conditional surprisal, which increases with decreasing probability. Participants were trained in an action observation paradigm with video clips showing sequences of 9-33 s length with varying numbers of action steps that were statistically structured according to a Markov chain. Behavioral tests revealed that participants implicitly learned this statistical structure, showing that humans are sensitive toward these probabilistic regularities. Surprisal (lower probability) enhanced the BOLD signal in the anterior intraparietal sulcus. In contrast, high conditional entropy, i.e., low predictability, was correlated with higher activity in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal gyrus, and posterior intraparietal sulcus. Furthermore, we found a correlation between the anterior hippocampus' response to conditional entropy with the extent of learning, such that the more participants had learnt the structure, the greater the magnitude of hippocampus activation in response to conditional entropy. Findings show that two aspects of predictions can be dissociated: an action's predictability is reflected in a top-down modulation of attentional focus, evident in increased fronto-parietal activation. In contrast, an action's probability depends on the identity of the stimulus itself, resulting in bottom-up driven processing costs in the parietal cortex.

摘要

本 fMRI 研究旨在探讨人类观察者是否会自发地利用连续动作序列的基础统计结构。具体来说,我们测试了两个不同的统计属性是否可以根据其神经相关性进行区分:动作步骤的可预测性及其概率。为了评估这些属性,我们使用了信息论的测量方法。动作步骤的可预测性通过其倒数条件熵来操作,条件熵结合了可能的动作步骤数量及其各自的概率。动作步骤的概率使用条件惊讶度来评估,惊讶度随着概率的降低而增加。参与者在一个动作观察范式中接受训练,该范式使用视频剪辑展示长度为 9-33 秒的序列,这些序列的动作步骤数量根据马尔可夫链的规则进行统计结构化。行为测试表明,参与者在潜意识中学习了这种统计结构,表明人类对这些概率规律很敏感。惊讶度(低概率)增强了前内顶叶皮层的 BOLD 信号。相比之下,高条件熵(即低可预测性)与背内侧前额叶皮层、眶额回和后内顶叶皮层的更高活动相关。此外,我们发现前海马体对条件熵的反应与学习程度之间存在相关性,即参与者学习结构的程度越大,海马体对条件熵的激活幅度就越大。研究结果表明,预测的两个方面可以分离:动作的可预测性反映在注意力焦点的自上而下调节中,这在额顶叶激活增加中很明显。相比之下,动作的概率取决于刺激本身的身份,导致顶叶皮层的自下而上驱动的处理成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/e98650ae2ff8/fnhum-08-00273-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/370fb463f1a3/fnhum-08-00273-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/b4291807470f/fnhum-08-00273-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/77c486f732f5/fnhum-08-00273-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/e98650ae2ff8/fnhum-08-00273-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/370fb463f1a3/fnhum-08-00273-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/b4291807470f/fnhum-08-00273-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/77c486f732f5/fnhum-08-00273-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a9/4019881/e98650ae2ff8/fnhum-08-00273-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dissociating dynamic probability and predictability in observed actions-an fMRI study.观察动作中的动态概率与可预测性分离:一项 fMRI 研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 7;8:273. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00273. eCollection 2014.
2
Prefrontal Cortex Activation Reflects Efficient Exploitation of Higher-order Statistical Structure.前额叶皮层激活反映了对高阶统计结构的有效利用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Dec;28(12):1909-1922. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01005. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
Predictive motor activation: Modulated by expectancy or predictability?预测性运动激活:受预期或可预测性调节?
Cognition. 2023 Feb;231:105324. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105324. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Spatial Attention, Motor Intention, and Bayesian Cue Predictability in the Human Brain.人类大脑中的空间注意力、运动意图与贝叶斯线索可预测性
J Neurosci. 2017 May 24;37(21):5334-5344. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3255-16.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
BOLD signal in intraparietal sulcus covaries with magnitude of implicitly driven attention shifts.顶内沟中的血氧水平依赖信号与内隐驱动的注意力转移幅度共变。
Neuroimage. 2009 May 1;45(4):1314-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.012. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
6
The Neural Correlates of Hierarchical Predictions for Perceptual Decisions.层级预测对知觉决策的神经关联。
J Neurosci. 2018 May 23;38(21):5008-5021. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2901-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
The fraction of an action is more than a movement: neural signatures of event segmentation in fMRI.动作的一部分不仅仅是运动:fMRI 中事件分割的神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
8
Predicting goals in action episodes attenuates BOLD response in inferior frontal and occipitotemporal cortex.预测动作情节中的目标会减弱额下回和枕颞叶皮层的血氧水平依赖反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Nov 1;274:108-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.053. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
9
Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom-up and top-down processes of visuospatial selective attention.视觉空间选择性注意的自下而上和自上而下过程之间的神经解剖学分离。
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):842-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.177. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
10
Influence of monkey dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior parietal activity on behavioral choice during attention tasks.猴子背外侧前额叶和顶叶后部活动对注意力任务中行为选择的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Sep;40(6):2910-21. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12662. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicative modulations of early action components support the prediction of distal goals.早期动作成分的交际调制支持对远距离目标的预测。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306072. eCollection 2024.
2
Visual statistical learning in deaf and hearing infants and toddlers.聋儿和健听婴幼儿的视觉统计学习。
Infancy. 2022 Jul;27(4):720-735. doi: 10.1111/infa.12474. Epub 2022 May 7.
3
People accurately predict the transition probabilities between actions.人们准确地预测了行动之间的转移概率。

本文引用的文献

1
Uncertainty in visual and auditory series is coded by modality-general and modality-specific neural systems.视觉和听觉序列中的不确定性由模态通用和模态特定的神经系统编码。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Apr;35(4):1111-28. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22238. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
2
Repetition suppression and expectation suppression are dissociable in time in early auditory evoked fields.在早期听觉诱发电场中,重复抑制和期望抑制在时间上是可分离的。
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13389-95. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2227-12.2012.
3
Surprised at all the entropy: hippocampal, caudate and midbrain contributions to learning from prediction errors.
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 26;7(9). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4995. Print 2021 Feb.
4
fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.功能磁共振成像揭示了自然语言句子理解过程中的语言特异性预测编码。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107307. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
Infants' Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions.婴儿的动作运动熟练度与统计学习
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 12;8:2174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02174. eCollection 2017.
6
Translating visual information into action predictions: Statistical learning in action and nonaction contexts.将视觉信息转化为动作预测:动作和非动作情境中的统计学习
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):600-613. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0788-6.
7
Statistical learning in social action contexts.社会行动背景下的统计学习
PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0177261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177261. eCollection 2017.
8
Steady-state and dynamic network modes for perceptual expectation.感知预期的稳态和动态网络模式。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40626. doi: 10.1038/srep40626.
9
The neural signature of information regularity in temporally extended event sequences.时间上扩展的事件序列中信息规律性的神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:266-276. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.021. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
对所有的熵感到惊讶:海马体、尾状核和中脑对预测误差学习的贡献。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036445. Epub 2012 May 3.
4
The fraction of an action is more than a movement: neural signatures of event segmentation in fMRI.动作的一部分不仅仅是运动:fMRI 中事件分割的神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
5
Dissociating hippocampal and striatal contributions to sequential prediction learning.分离海马体和纹状体对序列预测学习的贡献。
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1011-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07920.x.
6
Neural changes when actions change: adaptation of strong and weak expectations.当动作改变时,神经也会随之改变:强烈和微弱期望的适应。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jul;34(7):1713-27. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22023. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
7
Multiple sensitivity profiles to diversity and transition structure in non-stationary input.对非平稳输入中的多样性和转换结构的多重敏感性分析。
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):991-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.041. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
8
Psychological entropy: a framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety.心理熵:理解与不确定性相关的焦虑的框架。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):304-20. doi: 10.1037/a0026767. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
Statistical learning effects in musicians and non-musicians: an MEG study.音乐家和非音乐家的统计学习效应:一项 MEG 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jan;50(2):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.007. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
10
Uncertainty and cognitive control.不确定性与认知控制。
Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 3;2:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00249. eCollection 2011.